Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05TAIPEI3917 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05TAIPEI3917 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | American Institute Taiwan, Taipei |
| Created: | 2005-09-23 01:25:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | OPRC KMDR KPAO TW |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available. 230125Z Sep 05
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 TAIPEI 003917 SIPDIS DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EAP/TC, EAP/PA, EAP/PD - ERIC BARBORIAK DEPARTMENT PASS AIT/WASHINGTON E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: OPRC, KMDR, KPAO, TW SUBJECT: TAIWAN PUBLIC OPINION WITH REGARD TO U.S. ARMS PROCUREMENTS 1. Summary: U.S. Deputy Under Secretary of Defense Richard Lawless' speech at the 2005 U.S.-Taiwan Defense Industry Conference Monday, which was delivered by U.S. Defense Security Cooperation Agency's Security Cooperation Operations Principal Director Edward Ross, has sparked considerable discussion in various media venues. While Taiwan's pending arms procurement bill has been a standard topic for some time on the pages of the major Taipei dailies, Taiwan Internet forums and television talk shows, the statements in the Lawless speech aroused fresh attention, especially in newsprint. 2. The pro-independence "Liberty Times," Taiwan's biggest daily, ran a banner headline on its front page September 21 that read: "U.S. Official Warns That the United States Has No Obligation to Defend Taiwan." All the other Chinese-language newspapers carried news stories in their inside page on the Lawless speech, Taiwan legislators' reactions to statements, and the pan-Blue alliance's blocking of the passage of the U.S. arms procurement bill in the Legislative Yuan for the 29th time. 3. Major Chinese-language Taipei dailies September 22 carried news stories on Taiwan Ministry of National Defense's (MND) responses, as well as the reactions of more Taiwan legislators, to the Lawless speech. MND General Political Warfare Bureau Director Hu Chen-pu was quoted as saying Wednesday that U.S. officials had told him during his 2004 U.S. visit that the United States has no obligation to defend Taiwan. Hu also said the Taiwan military has always fought alone; it would be good if the United States could come to help, Hu said, but MND strategies have never included a plan involving the United States. The centrist "China Times" reported on Hu's statement on its page four under the headline: "In Response to U.S. Official's `Harsh Remarks,' Military: [We] Have Never Expected That the United States Would Help Defend Taiwan." The pro-unification "United Daily News," however, quoted Taiwan Vice Defense Minister Huo Shou-yeh as saying that the Pentagon was merely concerned about Taiwan's national security as a friend. Almost all the Taipei dailies carried Legislative Yuan President Wang Jin- pyng's remarks that the People First Party (PFP) holds the critical seats and a tough position regarding U.S. arms procurements in the Legislative Yuan, and that the PFP therefore has become the key to the arms deal. 4. Both the pro-unification "United Daily News" and centrist "China Times" ran news stories on the pan-Blue legislators' reactions to the Lawless speech. PFP Legislator Lin Yu-fang said the U.S. criticism is interference in Taiwan's domestic affairs and the United States is not qualified to criticize Taiwan's resolution to defend itself; Lin pointed out that Taiwan has bought NT$660 billion of U.S. arms from 1996 to 2000, and has thus become the second biggest overseas buyer of U.S. arms. KMT Legislator Su Chi said U.S. arms procurements are an issue that involves politics and finance, adding that Washington might not be aware of Taiwan's declining financial situation. Su also said pushing the tough statement of the United States is "like pouring oil on a fire." 5. The pro-independence "Liberty Times," on the other hand, carried comments by former Cabinet Secretary- General Liu Hsih-fang (pro-Green) that maintain that Taiwan's political parties should consider U.S. arms procurements from the perspective of the island's national interests, instead of from the interests of political parties. The newspaper also ran a news story that was topped with the headline: "[Former Deputy Assistant Secretary for East-Asian and Pacific Affairs] Randy Schriver: Cross-Strait Security Will Be More Difficult If the [U.S.] Arms Procurement Bill Fails to Pass." 6. In terms of editorials and commentaries, editorials in the pro-independence "Liberty Times," "Taiwan Daily" and English-language "Taipei Times" all criticized the pan-Blue camp for disregarding Taiwan's national security and blocking the U.S. arms procurement bill under the pretense of upholding public opinion. They also warned Taiwan to pay attention to Washington's change in both mentality and policy with regard to defending Taiwan. A "Liberty Times" editorial said: "The candid remarks by American officials, without doubt, have articulated an embarrassing fact that some pan-Blue politicians in Taiwan hold the United States to a promise that, given its moral responsibility, Washington will surely not give up on Taiwan. They are thus waiting fearlessly for the United States to defend Taiwan." A "Taipei Times" editorial concluded by saying: "It is time for all the people of Taiwan to reach a consensus on national security and show the US that Taiwan is not coward, nor a baby that knows only how to cry for help but refuses to help itself." 7. "United Daily News" Washington correspondent Vincent Chang wrote in an opinion piece that it is embarrassing that the United States must "teach" Taiwan how to value its security. Chang urged both the ruling party and the opposition parties in Taiwan to actually and substantially do something to deal with U.S. arms procurements matter. A famous Taiwan lawyer/law professor, Chen Charng-ven, said in a separate opinion piece in the "United Daily News" that Taiwan should continue to oppose U.S. arms procurements. Chen, however, also said the United States has no obligation to defend Taiwan if Taiwan is attacked by China since there is no defense pact between Taiwan and the United States. Chen said the United States needs China to play an important role regarding the North Korean nuclear issue, and added chances are slim that the United States would resort to using arms against China. 8. A review of ten Taiwan Internet forums that cover the political spectrum September 22 shows that the arms procurement topic is among the "top five" in terms of generating discussion, with the Lawless speech arousing particular attention. The speech, however, does not appear to have made those individuals who oppose the U.S. arms procurements to change their positions. In addition, those individuals who have been using the forums to criticize the pan-Blue blocking of the bill continued to do so, and encouraged the United States to exert more pressure on "pro-Chinese political figures in Taiwan." Overall, there were more postings on the ten forums against the proposed arms procurements than there were in favor of the purchases. One unusual opinion voiced on a Yahoo! Taiwan BBS devoted to military and weapon issues said the U.S. concern over the arms procurements was linked to a fear of better cross-Strait relations: "It is obvious that many stupid people believe that the sale of out-dated weapons by the Americans to us at high prices is to help Taiwan. Don't be so silly. ... What they want is the strategic position of the oceanic trench, the Taiwan Strait, without any care for the life and death of the Taiwan people. ... The United States is nervous that the military procurement [budget] cannot be approved because the Americans are afraid too much that Taiwan will cooperate with China." This last forum does not have a clear pan-Blue or pan-Green affiliation. 9. Out of the 8 most popular daily talk shows in Taipei -- 4 pro-Green and 4 pro-Blue -- only one revisited the issue after the Lawless speech was delivered by Ross in San Diego. The pro-Blue talk show, Two Ladies on the Front Line (ONTV), covered the arms procurement bill the night of September 22. The synopsis for this particular show (as posted on the station's website) does not mention the U.S. official's statements, but reads: "The U.S. arms procurement bill was rejected in the Legislative Yuan's Procedure Committee for the 29th time. [Taiwan Premier] Frank Hsieh says, 'I feel powerless.'" The discussions on the other talk shows that night focused on recent domestic political rows and cross-Strait relations. KEEGAN
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04