Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 85STATE80724 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 85STATE80724 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Secretary of State |
| Created: | 1985-03-16 08:23:00 |
| Classification: | SECRET |
| Tags: | IR PINT PEPR |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
R 160823Z MAR 85 FM SECSTATE WASHDC TO AMEMBASSY ABU DHABI AMEMBASSY ANKARA AMEMBASSY BEIRUT AMEMBASSY CAIRO AMEMBASSY DAMASCUS AMEMBASSY DOHA AMEMBASSY MOSCOW AMEMBASSY ISLAMABAD AMEMBASSY KUWAIT AMEMBASSY MANAMA AMEMBASSY MUSCAT AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI AMEMBASSY RIYADH AMEMBASSY TEL AVIV
S E C R E T STATE 080724 E.O. 12356: DECL: OADR TAGS: IR, PINT, PEPR SUBJECT: THE IRANIAN SUCCESSION 1. (S ENTIRE TEXT). 2. THE FOLLOWING ANALYSIS, PREPARED BY INR/NESA IN FEBRUARY 1985, MAY BE OF BACKGROUND INTEREST TO ADDRESSEE POSTS. T H E I R A N I A N S U C C E S S I O N A N D I T S C O N S E Q U E N C E S 3. IT IS OBVIOUSLY NOT POSSIBLE TO PREDICT PRECISELY HOW EVENTS WILL UNFOLD IN THE MONTHS AND YEARS FOLLOWING KHOMEINI'S DEATH. BUT THE CLERICAL GROUP NOW IN POWER IS SO ENTRENCHED THAT IT COULD DOMINATE FOR SOME YEARS. AT BEST, THERE COULD BE A GRADUAL SOFTENING OF THE REGIME'S VIEW OF THE US. BUT INCREASING INSTABILITY AND SOVIET PRESSURE ARE MORE LIKELY TO KEEP THE US IN THE POSITION OF THE MAJOR ENEMY OF IRAN. OVER THE LONGER RUN, WE THINK A SINGLE STRONG LEADER WILL EMERGE. IF HE COMES FROM THE REVOLUTIONARY GUARD MILITIA, AS NOW APPEARS THE BEST BET, HE WILL SHARE MUCH OF THE OUTLOOK OF THE PRESENT LEADERSHIP. THAT WOULD MAKE HIM DIFFICULT FOR THE US TO WORK WITH, THOUGH HE MIGHT NOT HAVE KHOMEINI'S DEDICATION TO PURSUING THE WAR WITH IRAQ. 4. PROBABLE SUCCESSION SCENARIO: MOST LIKELY IS A RELATIVELY SMOOTH INITIAL TRANSITION TO THE IMMEDIATE POST-KHOMEINI ERA. THE CLERICS ARE PREPARED TO MOVE QUICKLY TO MAINTAIN CONTINUITY AND CONTROL. A COMMITTEE OF EXPERTS TO MAKE THE CHOICE OF SUCCESSOR HAS BEEN ELECTED AND MEETS SEVERAL TIMES A YEAR. IT SEEMS INCLINED TO SETTLE ON AYATOLLAH MONTAZERI, A CHOICE WE BELIEVE WILL BE ENDORSED IN KHOMEINI'S SEALED WILL. MONTAZERI WOULD NOT BY ANY MEANS HAVE UNQUESTIONED COMMAND. INDEED, THE INITIAL IRANIAN GOVERNMENT WILL BE A COLLEGIAL AFFAIR BECAUSE NO SINGLE IRANIAN LEADER WILL BE ABLE TO REPLACE KHOMEINI. 5. THE MAIN IMMEDIATE CHALLENGE TO THIS SUCCESSION SCENARIO WOULD COME FROM THE JOCKEYING FOR POWER ALREADY APPARENT BETWEEN FACTIONS INSIDE THE PRESENT LEADERSHIP CADRE. SHOULD SUCH RIVALS AS PRESIDENT ALI KHAMENEI AND MAJLES LEADER ALI AKBAR RAFSANJANI CLASH, THAT WOULD INEVITABLY LEAD TO SERIOUS DISORDER. 6. A MAJOR DIFFICULTY WILL BE PRESENTED BY THE REVOLUTIONARY GUARD, THE PARAMILITARY ORGANIZATION WHICH HAS FUNCTIONED AS THE REGIME'S PRAETORIAN GUARD. EVEN KHOMEINI HAS NOT BEEN ABLE TO FIT THE GUARD SMOOTHLY INTO THE CURRENT SOCIAL OR GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE. AND SHOULD THE GUARD THROW ITS CONSIDERABLE WEIGHT BEHIND ONE FIGURE, HIS PRIMACY WOULD BE GIVEN A STRONG BOOST. 7. THE LONGER TERM: WHILE NON-CLERICAL ELEMENTS WILL HAVE A HARD TIME COMPETING IN THIS ARENA FOR A LONG TIME TO COME, THE CLERICS HAVE NOT INSTITUTIONALIZED CONTROL IN ANY DURABLE WAY. THE INSTABILITY PROVOKED BY INFIGHTING AMONG VARIOUS CLERICAL FACTIONS IS LIKELY TO BE INCREASED BY ECONOMIC TROUBLES AND OTHER STRUCTURAL WEAKNESSES (E.G., CONTINUED MIGRATION TO THE CITIES). 8. WE THUS REGARD A POSTKHOMEINI CLERICAL REGIME AS ESSENTIALLY TRANSITIONAL. THE CHANCES SEEM GOOD THAT IT WILL GIVE WAY SOONER OR LATER TO A SINGLE STRONG LEADER. ASSUMING THAT THERE WILL BE NO MAJOR OUTSIDE INTERVENTION TO DEFLECT THIS NATURAL COURSE OF EVENTS, THE TRANSITION MANEUVERING COULD BE LENGTHY. THAT WOULD OPEN OPPORTUNITIES TO A BROADER RANGE OF PLAYERS. 9. IN THE END, HOWEVER, WE THINK THAT THE CHANCES FAVOR THE EMERGENCE OF A "MAN ON HORSEBACK." WE WOULD EXPECT HIM TO ACT IN THE NAME OF ISLAM AND CLAIM TO DEFEND THE FRUITS OF THE REVOLUTION. AT PRESENT, THE MOST LIKELY INSTITUTION TO PRODUCE SUCH A FIGURE IS THE REVOLUTIONARY GUARD. IF THE TRANSITION IS LONG ENOUGH, HOWEVER, SOMEONE COULD EMERGE FROM THE REGULAR MILITARY, DESPITE EFFORTS TO PREVENT ANY POPULAR HERO FROM USING THE WAR WITH IRAQ TO CATAPULT INTO PROMINENCE. AS YET WE ARE UNABLE TO IDENTIFY POTENTIAL CANDIDATES. 10. POSSIBLE SOVIET ROLE: ALTHOUGH THE SOVIETS HAVE ASSETS AND CAN BRING SOME PRESSURE TO BEAR ON THE SUCCESSION SITUATION, WE DO NOT BELIEV THAT THEY WILL BE ABLE TO EXERT A DETERMINING INFLUENCE OVER THE COURSE OF EVENTS. THE TUDEH PARTY HAS BEEN CRIPPLED THROUGH ARRESTS AND EXECUTIONS, THOUGH ITS PRINCIPAL LEADERS ARE STILL ALIVE IN IRANIAN JAILS. WHILE THE SOVIETS MAY BE ENCOURAGING THE EMERGENCE OF A NEW PARTY ORGANIZATION, THE PARTY HAS NEVER ENJOYED BROAD APPEAL. SIMILARLY, SOVIET ASSETS AMONG THE MINORITIES WOULD FIND IT DIFFICULT TO INFLUENCE THE NATIONAL SCENE IN IRAN. 11. THE USSR CAN USE ITS CONTROL OVER LAND ROUTES TO IRAN, ABOUT 20 PERCENT OF WHICH PASS THROUGH SOVIET TERRITORY, TO EXERT PRESSURE. AND IT MIGHT BE ABLE TO MANIPULATE ARMS SALES, IF BY THAT TIME THE SOVIETS HAD MANAGED TO ESTABLISH A MAJOR SUPPLY RELATIONSHIP. BUT PRESSING IN THIS WAY WOULD BE RISKY AND THE SOVIETS PROBABLY WOULD NOT MAKE AN ALL-OUT PUSH IN THIS DIRECTION. 12. WE DO NOT EXPECT A SOVIET MILITARY INVASION OF IRAN. A LIMITED STRIKE INTO THE BORDER PROVINCE OF AZERBAIJAN WOULD BE POSSIBLE IF IRAN WERE IN CHAOS AND APPEARED TO BE FRAGMENTING. HOWEVER, THE SOVIETS WOULD PROBABLY ACT ONLY IF A US MILITARY RESPONSE APPEARED UNLIKELY. ALTERNATIVELY, THEY MIGHT ATTEMPT TO OCCUPY AZERBAIJAN IF THEY BELIEVED THE US WERE PREPARING TO SEIZE PORTIONS OF SOUTHERN IRAN. THE USSR MIGHT LAUNCH A PREEMPTIVE INVASION IF IT SUSPECTED US PREPARATIONS EITHER TO INTERVENE ON BEHALF OF PRO-AMERICAN ELEMENTS OR TO SECURE IRANIAN OIL FIELDS. 13. ALL THESE CONTINGENCIES APPEAR EXTREMELY DISTANT. THE SOVIETS WOULD HAVE TO ANTICIPATE THAT THEY WOULD FACE A US MILITARY RESPONSE AS WELL AS DIFFICULT LOGISTICAL AND TERRAIN PROBLEMS. MOREOVER, THE SOVIET LEADERS PROBABLY PROJECT THAT IRANIAN RESISTANCE WOULD BE ON THE ORDER OF THEIR AFGHAN EXPERIENCE AND THAT MAJOR RESOURCES WOULD BE REQUIRED TO PACIFY A COUNTRY AS LARGE AND POPULOUS AS IRAN. 14. OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE US? THE US WILL PROBABLY HAVE LITTLE OPPORTUNITY TO INFLUENCE THE COURSE OF EVENTS IN THE IMMEDIATE POST-KHOMEINI PERIOD. LEADING POLITICAL FIGURES APPARENTLY STILL BELIEVE THAT THE US HAS NOT ACCEPTED THE REVOLUTION AND ITS RESULTS. AS LONG AS WE APPEAR TO BE TILTING TOWARD IRAQ AND ARE ISRAEL'S CLOSEST SUPPORTER, THEY ARE UNLIKELY TO CHANGE THAT OPINION. IN ADDITION, THE REGIME SEES ITSELF LOCKED IN A STRUGGLE WITH THE US FOR CONTROL OF THE HEARTS AND MINDS OF THE ISLAMIC WORLD. THUS THEY IDENTIFY THE US AS THE PRIMARY ENEMY TO BE DEFEATED IN THE EFFORT TO LIBERATE THE ISLAMIC WORLD FROM THE GRIP OF WESTERN CULTURAL VALUES. 15. THESE PERCEPTIONS PUT THE US IN A PARTICULARLY DIFFICULT POSITION AS IRAN MOVES INTO THE POST-KHOMEINI ERA. ANY SUCCESSOR REGIME SEEMS DESTINED TO MAINTAIN ITSELF IN POWER IN THE NAME OF ISLAM AND THE REVOLUTION. THUS IT WILL HAVE A BUILT-IN ANTI-AMERICAN BIAS. IRAN MIGHT GROW LESS HOSTILE TO THE US OVER TIME IF WE WERE NOT SEEN AS WORKING AGAINST THE REGIME IN TEHRAN, E.G., BY ENCOURAGING THE CUT-OFF OF ARMS TO IRAN. BUT THIS WOULD BE A SLOW PROCESS AT BEST, AND IT COULD BE SET BACK BY EVENTS OVER WHICH WE WOULD HAVE NO CONTROL. 16. THE IRAN-IRAQ WAR: KHOMEINI'S DEATH WOULD REMOVE ONE OF THE STAUNCHEST ADVOCATES IN IRAN OF WAR TO THE BITTER END. YET THE CLERICS ARE BY AND LARGE UNITED ON THE CONTINUATION OF THE WAR, UNLESS IRAN CAN EMERGE WITH HONOR. THAT WOULD INCLINE MOST OF THEM TO INSIST ON THE OUSTER OF IRAQI PRESIDENT SADAM HUSSEIN AS A PRECONDITION FOR ENDING HOSTILITIES. 17. NONETHELESS, THE SUCCESSOR REGIME, ONCE IT FELT MORE OR LESS SOLIDLY IN CONTROL AT HOME, MIGHT BECOME MORE FLEXIBLE IN ITS ATTITUDES TOWARD THE WAR. TACTICS FOR FIGHTING AND TOWARD NEGOTIATIONS WOULD BE AMONG SEVERAL ISSUES THAT WILL DIVIDE THE REGIME LOYALISTS. OPPONENTS OF THE WAR ARE LIKELY TO BLAME ITS ADVOCATES FOR WEAKENING THE REGIME'S BASE OF SUPPORT, FOR THE LARGE CASUALTIES, AND FOR DIVERSION OF ECONOMIC RESOURCES. THE WAR'S PROPONENTS, ON THE OTHER HAND, WILL CHARGE THAT ITS OPPONENTS LACK REVOLUTIONARY ISLAMIC FERVOR AND ARE NOT ADHERING TO KHOMEINI'S WISHES. 18. ON BALANCE, THEREFORE, WE BELIVE THAT THE CHANCES OF ENDING THE WAR WILL RISE SOMEWHAT AFTER KHOMEINI DEPARTS. BUT IRAN'S WILLINGNESS TO MAKE PEACE IS BY NO MEANS A FOREGONE CONCLUSION. SHULTZ
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04