Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05BRASILIA2449 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05BRASILIA2449 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Brasilia |
| Created: | 2005-09-14 22:07:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | KIPR ECON WTO |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS BRASILIA 002449 SIPDIS SENSITIVE DEPT FOR WHA/BSC AND EB/TPP/IPE SWILSON DEPT PLEASE PASS TO USTR FOR BPECK, DMULLANEY, LYANG DEPT PLEASE PASS TO USPTO FOR CELOSHWAY AND DKEATING USDOC FOR 4332/ITA/MAC/WH/OLAC/JANDERSEN/ADRISCOLL/MWAR D USDOC FOR 3134/ITA/USCS/OIO/WH/RD/DDEVITO/DANDERSON/EOL SON NSC FOR SCRONIN E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: KIPR, ECON, WTO SUBJECT: BRAZIL SUPPORTS US POSITION IN WTO GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS DEBATE REF: SECSTATE 165908 1. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED, PLEASE PROTECT ACCORDINGLY 2. (SBU) On September 9, Econoff delivered reftel points on the EU's GI proposal in the TRIPS Council to Otavio Brandelli, IPR Division Chief in Brazil's Foreign Ministry. In a September 14 follow-up discussion, Brandelli said the GoB agrees entirely with the US points and that instructions would be sent to Brazil's delegation in Geneva to make similar points during the WTO Special Session on Geographical Indications on September 16. 3. (SBU) Brandelli cautioned, however, that this coincidence of positions should not be misinterpreted as a sign that Brazil is joining the "anti-GI" group in the Council, as Brazil prefers to remain "independent." Chicola
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04