Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05ANKARA5353 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05ANKARA5353 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Ankara |
| Created: | 2005-09-14 14:46:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PTER PGOV PREL TU IZ PKK |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ANKARA 005353 SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/12/2015 TAGS: PTER, PGOV, PREL, TU, IZ, PKK SUBJECT: TURKEY OFFERS REVISIONS TO PKK "FRAMEWORK FOR ACTION" DOCUMENT REF: STATE 149796 Classified By: Acting DCM Timothy A. Betts for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d). 1. (C) MFA Director General for Security Affairs Amb. Hayati Guven called in PolMilCouns Sept. 9 to hand over Turkey's proposed revisions to the PKK "Framework for Action" document (reftel) as part of the trilateral U.S.-Turkey-Iraq process on the PKK. Guven noted that MFA Deputy Under Secretary Amb. Nabi Sensoy had drafted the Turkish revisions. Full text of the Turkish document in para. four below. Guven said he would appreciate U.S. feedback on Turkey's proposals, and agreed that this is a "living document." 2. (C) Following is the Turkish explanation for a number of their proposed revisions (there are other proposed Turkish revisions; these are the items Guven discussed with us): --Para. 1: GOT proposes to change the phrase from "eliminate the PKK terrorist threat" to "eliminate the terrorist PKK presence in Iraq." Guven explained that Turkey wants this change in order to narrow the focus of the trilateral talks to tangible steps to deal with the PKK in Iraq (he described achieving these tangible steps as Turkey's top priority for these talks). He referred to what he described as the essence of UNSCR 1373: "prosecute or extradite," saying this is what Turkey expects of Iraq. --Turkey seeks to eliminate para. 2 of the U.S. text (setting up direct contacts between Turkish and Iraqi entities) and to make this an agenda item for the next trilateral meeting. Guven explained that Turkey did not get the impression from the last meeting in Washington that the Iraqis were very serious about bilateral mutual legal assistance and cooperation. He cited the Iraqi head of delegation's comment that the Interpol "red border" warrants "were just pieces of paper"--as well as the ITG's failure to send a delegation prepared to definitively describe Iraq's procedures for dealing with "red borders" and with extradition requests--as evidence for this claim. In addition, no one came from the Iraqi Ministry of Justice, he observed. Thus Turkey believes it is better that Iraq and Turkey agree to proceed cooperatively before establishing these contacts. PolMilCouns responded that perhaps if the relevant Turkish and Iraqi entities were to make contact now they could discuss a basis for cooperation, but Guven repeated that this should be a matter for the next trilateral meeting. --Para. 8 (U.S. text): Guven said that Turkey does not want the next trilateral talks to take place on the margins of the Iraq neighbors' interior ministers' meeting; these should be separate. He added that while Turkey matched our wording that the next trilateral meeting should be in October, in fact the GOT believes it would be better to hold them in November, i.e., after Ramadan. He asserted that meeting during Ramadan is no problem for Turkey, but opined that it would be difficult for the Iraqis. Additionally, if the meeting were to be held in the region (for example, in Amman), Ramadan might also present a problem there. 3. (C) COMMENT: While the Turks are willing to continue the trilateral process--and want to work with us to manage public expectations--they are dissatisfied with what they see as a lack of seriousness by the Iraqi side. END COMMENT. 4. (C) Text of Turkish re-draft of Framework for Action document (as delivered--note internal paragraph numbering) BEGIN TEXT PKK Trilateral Talks August 6, 2005 Washington DC Framework for Action Following is the framework of action proposed at the conclusion of the PKK Trilateral Talks: 1. Iraq and Turkey respect each other's differing priorities on counterterrorism and agree on the need to eliminate the terrorist PKK presence in Iraq. Specifically: - Iraq recognizes the need for rapid and tangible steps to eliminate the PKK threat towards Turkey, including measures to be taken against PKK terrorists which will be discussed during the Trilateral Talks. Iraq also recognizes that PKK, as a terrorist organization, might pose a threat to its own stability. - Turkey recognizes that Iraq feels besieged by multiple terrorist threats and that its capabilities are limited. It attaches highest priority to the preservation of the sovereignty, unity, territorial integrity and stability of Iraq. 2. In conformity with the international practice, Interpol Red Notices will be duly treated by Iraqi authorities in execution of Turkey's demands for temporary arrests and extradition of PKK terrorists within the framework of Turkey-Iraq treaty on legal assistance and extradition. At the forthcoming meeting of the Trilateral Talks, Iraq will clarify which additional documents are required for the completion of extradition procedures and will determine its position on the bilateral treaty on legal assistance and extradition with Turkey and with the US, while ensuring that they remain in force, to allow immediate action against the PKK. 3. Cooperation modalities between Turkey's and Iraq's police, security services and the Ministries of Interior will be an agenda item of the next meeting of the Trilateral Talks. 4. Turkey and Iraq will consult on the need of training and equipment to improve the capability of Iraqi police and security forces to arrest PKK terrorists. 5. Iraq and Turkey, with facilitation from the United States, will hold discussions on how to eliminate the PKK presence at the Makhmour Camp. 6. Iraq and Turkey will further elaborate on the above initiatives in separate discussions underway among the Ministers of Interior of the Neighboring Countries of Iraq. 7. Trilateral Talks will reconvene in October 2005. 8. The United States Embassy in Baghdad will, if necessary, facilitate direct discussions of the above matters between Iraq and Turkey. END TEXT MCELDOWNEY
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04