Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05SANJOSE2104 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05SANJOSE2104 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy San Jose |
| Created: | 2005-09-09 23:16:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | ETRD ECPS ECON PREL PGOV SOCI CS |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 SAN JOSE 002104 SIPDIS WHA/CEN EB FOR WCRAFT, BMANOGUE EB/CIP FOR WAYALA E FOR DEDWARDS WHA FOR WMIELE WHA/EPSC FOR KURS, LGUMBINER H FOR JHAGAN STATE PASS TO USTR FOR RVARGO, NMOORJANI, AMALITO E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: ETRD, ECPS, ECON, PREL, PGOV, SOCI, CS SUBJECT: STATUS OF THE PROPOSED LAW TO STRENGTHEN AND MODERNIZE ICE REF: SAN JOSE 01828 1. (SBU) Summary. The Legislative Assembly,s Special Mixed Commission to review the Law to Strengthen and Modernize the Costa Rican Institute of Electricity (ICE) ended its 28-month tenure without coming to agreement on how to proceed with the proposed telecommunications reform law. The contentious legislative project is now essentially at a standstill. Assembly members (deputies) could not agree on extending the Commission,s charter due to profound differences between those deputies that lean towards giving the venerated state-owned institution unprecedented autonomy and special treatment and those who want to encourage increased competition that would result from implementation of the United States-Central American-Dominican Republic Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR). Despite not moving forward on this proposed law, the Administration states that it is ready to submit proposed legislation in the areas on which the Commission could not agree. End Summary. 2. (U) The stated reason for proposing the Law to Strengthen and Modernize ICE was to give the organization the financial autonomy and resources to be able to compete against potential competitors in an open telecommunications market. The Costa Rican negotiators felt that the strengthening and modernization of ICE was so important that they inserted this into the text of the United States-Central America-Dominican Republic Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR). (Note: The text of CAFTA-DR actually states that this law was to be passed by December 31, 2004.) 3. (U) The Special Mixed Commission on ICE was chaired by Gloria Valerin, a deputy from President Pacheco,s Social Christian Unity Party (PUSC). Other deputy members included Federico Malavassi from the Libertarian Movement Party (ML), Ricardo Toledo, the PUSC presidential candidate in the upcoming February 2006 election, German Rojas (PUSC), Alvaro Gonzalez (PLN), Carlos Benevides (PLN), Luis Gerardo Villanueva (PLN), Rodrigo Carazo from the Citizens, Action Party (PAC), Ruth Montoya (PAC), Emilia Rodriguez from the Patriotic Bloc (BP), and Carlos Avendano from the Costa Rican Renovation Party (PRC). 4. (U) The Commission also consisted of eight representatives from several interested and knowledgeable organizations, including ICE, the Union of Chambers of Private Enterprises (UCAAEP), the Chamber of Information Technology, the labor union representing ICE workers, the non-governmental Free Consumers Association, National Council of University Rectors, the Costa Rican Federation for Environmental Conservation, and the Ministry of Science and Technology. (Note: Only the deputy members of the Commission actually had a vote in official proceedings.) This broad representation is reflective of the importance of ICE in the minds of many Costa Ricans. ------- COMMENT ------- 5. (SBU) Several options exist including: (1) sending the issue straight to the Assembly floor for a vote, (2) create an ad hoc deputies-only Commission to review the bill, or (3) do nothing. Realistically, creation of a new deputies-only Commission is the most likely option, but the issue will not be any less contentious. 6. (SBU) Given the current political situation, it is unlikely this bill will pass in its current form prior to CAFTA-DR ratification. Gilberto Barrantes, Minister of Economy and Chair of the President,s Economic Council said that the Administration is ready to submit proposed legislation in the areas in which the Commission could not agree. He offered no more details than that. 7. (SBU) ICE needs more financial autonomy to compete in an open market; for instance, it should not be bound by some of the inflexible and arduous government processes with which it must currently comply, e.g., the cumbersome procedures for taking on new debt. However, the proposed law to strengthen and modernize ICE, if passed in its current form, almost certainly would have caused problems complying with CAFTA-DR commitments (reftel). The Administration and the Legislative Assembly will eventually need to agree on how ICE will function in the open telecommunications market created by CAFTA-DR. FRISBIE
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04