Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 02HARARE2305 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 02HARARE2305 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Harare |
| Created: | 2002-10-18 08:47:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | PREL PHUM KPAO KMDR ZI |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS HARARE 002305
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR AF/PD, AF/S, AF/RA
NSC FOR JENDAYI FRAZER
LONDON FOR GURNEY
PARIS FOR NEARY
NAIROBI FOR PFLAUMER
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL, PHUM, KPAO, KMDR, ZI
SUBJECT: GOVERNMENT NEWSPAPER PUBLISHED ANTI-BIOTECH
TRACT
1. Under headline "Beware of Americans bearing
`gifts'" the government-controlled daily "The Herald"
published a silly anti-biotech article attributed to
Raj Patel of "Third World Network Features":
2. "Food aid from U.S. is increasingly met with
suspicion and skepticism by many who describe
the export of unlabelled genetically modified
food to needy nations as `a dangerous game
played with the lives of starving people for
political gain. . .' The U.S. Government has
been playing this game for well over a decade;
the famine in Southern Africa provided merely
the latest installment. . . The covert U.S.
introduction of GM food into Africa is harmful,
for four reasons. First, there is mounting
evidence that GM crops maybe unsafe. . .
Second, the covert introduction of GM food in
the Third World also jeopardizes the possibility
of an independent non-GM food policy within the
EU. . . The third reason to be worried is that
the GM food aid compromises the sovereignty of
Southern African countries. . . The reason poor
countries now find themselves holding a begging
bowl is because of the last `gift' they accepted
from the U.S. and EU: structural adjustment
policies. . . The notion of `saving lives
through food aid' rings a little hollow if we
remember this; there were, prior to structural
adjustment, ample ways to feed the people,
without relying on frankenfood. Southern
African countries didn't have much of a choice
about becoming beggars, but they can choose what
to do next. . ."
3. Comment: Publication of this article shows
continuing official Zimbabwean hostility toward
biotech food in spite of the government's
decision to accept it (with conditions) in food
assistance.
SULLIVAN
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04