Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 02AMMAN5964 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 02AMMAN5964 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Amman |
| Created: | 2002-10-15 11:51:00 |
| Classification: | SECRET |
| Tags: | EFIN ECON PREL JO |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 02 AMMAN 005964 SIPDIS NSC FOR GARY EDSON NEA FOR A/S BURNS EB FOR A/S WAYNE FOR U/S LARSON E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/14/2007 TAGS: EFIN, ECON, PREL, JO SUBJECT: JORDAN: U/S LARSON MEETINGS ON ECONOMIC PLANNING Classified By: DCM Gregory L. Berry. Reasons 1.5 (b) and (d). 1. (C) Under Secretary Larson had meetings in Amman October 13-14 with Prime Minister Abul Ragheb and key members of the Jordanian ministerial "economic team," including Finance Minster Marto, Planning Minister Awadallah, Trade Minister Bashir and Central Bank Governor Umayya Toukan. He also met Foreign Minister Muasher and had a two-hour session with business leaders. 2. (S) The meetings were an opportunity to develop a deeper understanding of the points raised in the Jordanian paper on the economic impact on Jordan of potential coalition military operations in Iraq. In preparation for Deputies-level discussions this week, following are the main themes that emerged from Larson's discussions. These should be read in conjunction with the State Department-prepared paper on economic assistance to Jordan that has been submitted for the Deputies' deliberations. -- Sense of urgency. All the ministers, but especially the Prime Minister, stressed a strong desire to have emergency U.S. assistance in hand well in advance of any conflict, that is, ideally before year's end (given the widespread assumption that operations would not begin before that time). The PM described at length how he needed this both to prepare for economic consequences and to reinforce domestic political support for the policies Jordan would follow in the event of a conflict. Larson described the mismatch between this Jordanian timeline and the U.S. budgetary process. Understanding, however, that it would be easier to sustain domestic political support if there were a publicly useful show of U.S. support for Jordan, a clear indication that a plan was in place would be helpful, economically and politically, to bridge the gap. -- Oil. The ministers, particularly Marto, recognized that Jordan's current oil arrangement with Iraq was not sustainable in any case. However, an abrupt transition to market prices would be a major fiscal and economic shock. The foreign minister reported a slight opening regarding supply alternatives: The visiting Kuwaiti minister of state for foreign affairs told the Jordanians that he would propose a formula to his Saudi and UAE counterparts for dividing up a package of 80,000 barrels of crude per day for Jordan. This could create an opportunity to work with the Gulf producers to develop a temporary plan for price mitigation. Under Secretary Larson will also raise Jordan's needs in meetings this week in Saudi Arabia and the UAE. Nevertheless, the Jordanians are extremely dubious that the Gulf states will provide oil on a discounted basis and thus mitigate the sharp economic shock inherent in having their import bill increase by 5% of GDP. -- Export Disruption. Members of the business community as well as the ministers highlighted the importance of avoiding or minimizing a disruption of Jordanian exports, particularly the booming textile exports to the U.S. under the QIZ initiative. Concerns included reluctance of U.S. importers to place orders during what is perceived to be a crisis period and the risk of air and seaport closure, as well as war risk insurance premiums that discourage port calls in Jordan and Israel. Larson described the U.S. experience last year in dealing with similar issues involving exports from Pakistan. It could be useful to include such work with insurance companies and leading importers in a plan to address Jordan's needs. -- Bank Exposure. Another specific concern was the exposure of Jordan's banking system in the form of letters of credit extended to finance Oil-for-Food program exports to Iraq. The Central Bank Governor estimated that Jordanian banks had $500-700 million in such credits outstanding at any one time. Currently, the banks are paid from the O-F-F account only after the UN certifies delivery of goods in Baghdad. As the governor suggested, the UN could explore alternative procedures to allow UN officials to certify delivery at the Iraqi border or in special warehouses in Amman if it became impossible to do so in Baghdad. This could mitigate the risk borne by the banks and facilitate the continued flow of humanitarian goods to Iraq. -- Bilateral Jordanian Exports to Iraq. Jordan currently exports $200-$300 million in goods and services to Iraq in partial payment for oil received under the bilateral oil for goods barter arrangement. This is a declining but nevertheless substantial share of Jordan's exports, as well as of employment and the company base. Since alternative markets probably do not exist for these generally low-quality goods, it is not immediately clear how to address what is essentially a political risk. -- Domestic Trucking. Managing the reaction of the politically important trucking industry that currently moves the oil and goods trade with Iraq was clearly one of the Prime Minister's main political preoccupations. Further work could be done to sharpen our appreciation of the demand for trucking services in the event of a conflict, such as to move humanitarian or other goods from Jordan to Iraq. Such planning could allay some of this concern. 3. (C) Larson stressed in all his meetings that Jordan's concerns were receiving serious, top-level attention in Washington. He hoped that his trip could be the beginning of a deeper exchange. Once the U.S. was ready, Jordanian ministers expressed their readiness to travel to Washington or Europe to discuss economic planning in greater depth. 4. (C) Under Secretary Larson reviewed this message and requested that it be distributed to participants in the Deputies meetings. GNEHM
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04