Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05BANGKOK5559 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05BANGKOK5559 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Bangkok |
| Created: | 2005-08-30 07:00:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | AORC EAID SENV TPHY TH KSCI |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 BANGKOK 005559 SIPDIS SENSITIVE DEPT FOR OES/ETIRPAK AND OES/ASTEWART E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: AORC, EAID, SENV, TPHY, TH, KSCI SUBJECT: U.S. ENGAGEMENT IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF TSUNAMI WARNING SYSTEMS: THAILAND'S VIEWS REF: A) STATE 152264 B) BANGKOK 870 C) BANGKOK 4796 1. (SBU) Following receipt of the demarche in Ref A, U.S. Trade and Development Agency Officer contacted Deputy Director General Kriengkrai of Thailand's Meteorological Department (Met Dept) under the Ministry of Information and Communication Technology and an official at Thailand's National Disaster Warning Center (NDWC) who requested not to be identified by name. Both officials were candid in their answers to the questions listed in Ref A. Although Mission was aware of Thailand's tendency to "go it alone" with regard to Tsunami Warning Systems (TWS), we were surprised at the level of misgiving the Thais displayed towards the IOC Intergovernmental Coordination Group's coordination of an Indian Ocean Tsunami Warning System (IOTWS) among Indian Ocean countries. End summary. 2. (SBU) The questions and answers below are keyed to the questions listed in para 15 of Ref A: - (For Indian Ocean countries only) If the Indian Ocean Tsunami Warning System (IOTWS) should be managed by a single, SIPDIS regional center in the Indian Ocean region, where should the IOTWS center be located and why? Met Dept: Thailand favors the idea of establishing a national center in each Indian Ocean country and encouraging close cooperation between those centers. It appears that many countries in the region want to be the regional center, starting with Australia, India, Thailand, and Indonesia; more recently Malaysia, Pakistan, Iran have shown interest in becoming the regional center ) it appears that it will be difficult to arrive at consensus for a single country to be the center. We are also concerned that some Indian Ocean countries may not be willing to cooperate fully, especially India who did not share information on the July 24 earthquake near Nicobar Island. This does not bode well for IOTWS efforts. (Embassy note: We are relaying here what the Thai Meteorological Department told us and cannot corroborate its statement about India sharing or not sharing information. End note.) NDWC: Thailand does not favor the idea of establishing a single regional center (as the Thai delegation stated in Perth). One of our main concerns is that unless the regional center gets full support and cooperation from the other Indian Ocean countries, it will be unable to accomplish its tasks. Embassy comment: Thailand pushed hard its bid to become the regional center for an IOTWS at a ministerial meeting it hosted in Phuket at the end of January (Ref A). After it failed to win support from India, Australia, and Indonesia at that meeting, it has consistently supported the notion of a multi-nodal system in which no single country is designated the regional center. - Is your government committed to purchase TWS equipment or has it received assistance for the purchase of TWS equipment? What kind of equipment? Where do you perceive a need for additional assistance? Met Dept: Prime Minister Thaksin wants three DART buoys to be completely installed by September 2006 (one buoy installed in early 2006 and two more buoys by the end of 2006). Thailand will also buy at least one TWS cable system (Japanese) and some tidal gauges. Thailand is interested in NOAA and Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) products and services, but needs to assure that: 1) NOAA can supply buoys in a reasonable time period 2) SAIC has a local rep who can deal with after-sales-services 3) Technical assistance can be provided to help Thailand link and integrate the data from the various detection devices. Thailand also urgently needs a quotation from NOAA regarding DART buoy and maintenance costs. Meanwhile, Germany is aggressively promoting its Ocean buoy. Germany recently donated two buoys to Indonesia and plans to donate more. NDWC: The Thai government has allocated a budget of 400 million baht ($10 million USD) to procure a TWS cable system (Japanese) to be installed near Thai islands in the Andaman Sea. The Japanese cable System may be able to complement the buoy system. We also have a budget 180 million baht ($4.5 million) for the procurement of buoys. The government would prefer to purchase more sophisticated technology such as DART buoys, but may have to consider less high-tech options such as the lower cost German buoys. Procurement decisions will be made soon. Embassy comment: During a mid-August visit to Thailand, David McKinnie of NOAA and Orestes Anastasia, USAID Program Manager for the IOTWS program based in Bangkok, told officials from the Meteorological Department and the Seismological Bureau that the high-tech DART buoys are not currently available (each buoy is fabricated individually by NOAA) and that when they do become available, they will not be offered to individual governments per se, but to the Indian Ocean Region as a whole under the UNESCO/Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC) framework. In addition, it is noteworthy that Germany's buoys (such as those donated to Indonesia) are still in the R&D phase, and do not have the same degree of demonstrated reliability as U.S. DART buoys. - What is your impression of what the IOC Intergovernmental Coordination Group should have in place within the next six months? How do you plan to demonstrate new domestic warning capabilities in that timeframe? Met Dept: No comment on the IOC Intergovernmental Coordination Group. Thailand cannot possibly demonstrate new capabilities within the next six months because the procurement and installation of buoys, TWS cable and tidal gauges won't be completed until at least September 2007. NDWC: Thailand has been unimpressed by the IOC. Thai officials who participated in previous IOC meetings commented that the meetings were a lot of talk with no action. Thailand may reconsider its level of participation in future IOC meetings. The NDWC may delay major decisions on investments until early October, pending personnel changes. Embassy comment: We were surprised at the level of frustration our interlocutors voiced with the IOC process. Since its own attempt at being designated the regional center in January failed, however, Thailand has said all along that its first priority is developing a national TWS, coordinating with other Indian Ocean countries and the IOC as possible. Embassy comment continued: The Meteorological Department and NDWC interlocutors focused on the high-tech detection component of its TWS. In fact, the other components of its TWS ) national communications system and public awareness and response ) were tested successfully following the July 24 earthquake near Nicobar Island. On July 24, the NDWC broadcast a live television alert within 20 minutes of first learning of the earthquake (from Malaysia). Local officials evacuated thousands of people from their homes and, except for numerous traffic jams, without major incident (Ref B). ARVIZU
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04