Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05TELAVIV5138 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05TELAVIV5138 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Tel Aviv |
| Created: | 2005-08-19 11:05:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PREL KPAL KWBG PGOV IS EG GAZA DISENGAGEMENT GOI EXTERNAL GOI INTERNAL |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 TEL AVIV 005138 SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/16/2015 TAGS: PREL, KPAL, KWBG, PGOV, IS, EG, GAZA DISENGAGEMENT, GOI EXTERNAL, GOI INTERNAL SUBJECT: NEA A/S WELCH'S AUGUST 16, 2005 MEETING WITH ISRAELI MOD DG AMOS YARON REVIEWS POST-DISENGAGEMENT ISSUES Classified By: Ambassador Daniel C. Kurtzer. Reasons: 1.4 (b, d). ======= SUMMARY ======= 1. (C) Israeli MOD Director General Amos Yaron updated NEA A/S Welch, Ambassador Kurtzer and General Ward August 16 on the status of post-Gaza disengagement issues. On the disposition of settler housing, Yaron asked the USG to continue its efforts to identify a program manager to oversee removal of rubble from the Gaza Strip to the Sinai. A/S Welch said the USG would try to get the Europeans to identify as soon as possible a company that could serve as project manager, or allow pursuit of alternatives. On Gaza-West Bank passage improvements, Yaron suggested Dahlan was blocking progress on the issue by focusing on the northern Gaza-Israel border, thereby making it impossible for USAID to release USD 50 million to Israel for passage improvement. Yaron stressed that Israel would continue to fund its own efforts to move forward on passages, but requested A/S Welch's assistance in getting USAID to turn over the USD 50 million to the GOI so that Israel could directly procure relevant U.S. technologies and cover related operational and infrastructure expenses. Yaron clarified that Israel's fulfillment of Palestinian demands for "door-to-door" service are contingent on the maintenance of security after disengagement, and this would take time. 2. (C) On Philadelphi and Rafah, Yaron reviewed the Israeli and Palestinian positions, and offered Israel's willingness to explore an alternative to Palestinian control and operation of the Rafah crossing for goods and people by opening a temporary terminal in Kerem Shalom. Yaron made it clear that Israel could not accept a third party, such as Egypt, clearing off on goods and persons crossing the Egypt-Gaza border. A/S Welch and Ambassador Kurtzer urged Yaron to explore creative solutions to the Rafah impasse, including a third party role, that would satisfy Israeli and Egyptian security interests and tangibly demonstrate to the Palestinians that their situation has changed as a result of disengagement. END SUMMARY. ============================================= ========== HOUSING: PROJECT MANAGER, AGREED SECURITY REGIME NEEDED ============================================= ========== 3. (C) Yaron said the GOI hopes to reach agreement in the near future with Palestinian Authority (PA) Civil Affairs Minister Mohammed Dahlan about how to securely remove the remains of dismantled setter housing from Gaza. All sides agree that the Egyptians are to take the unusable and non-hazardous rubble. For the GOI, the remaining issue is ensuring that that rubble removal process conforms with Israel's security requirements. The trucks exiting Gaza must haul rubble, and, when they return, they must be empty or only contain sand for Gaza's beaches. 4. (C) Yaron also stressed that the GOI hopes to learn as soon as possible who will be the program manager for the settler housing dismantlement project. He understood that the USG had approached the World Bank and European Union. A/S Welch said that the USG had been working hard over the last few days to resolve the matter. Secretary Rice had raised it with her Quartet counterparts on August 12, and A/S Welch had discussed it with his Quartet counterpart, Mark Otte, on August 15. Yaron wondered aloud whether an American company could provide the services. A/S Welch said it would be more efficient to have a company involved that has experience working in Gaza. (NOTE: A/S Welch mentioned IMG, and Yaron indicated familiarity with the company. END NOTE.) A/S Welch promised to get the Europeans to reach agreement or have them decide that an alternative should be pursued. ============================================= ========= YARON SAYS DAHLAN, USAID STALLING PASSAGE IMPROVEMENTS ============================================= ========= 5. (C) Yaron stressed that the GOI knows how important it is to help the Palestinians see that the Gaza-West Bank passage issue has improved for them as a result of disengagement: "We are ready to make a 180-degree change regarding services to the Palestinians." He complained, however, that Dahlan is making progress on passage improvement difficult by insisting on discussion of the Erez border line. Yaron recalled that he told Quartet Special Envoy (QSE) Wolfensohn that while Israel has funded the establishment of a passage for goods at Erez, the Palestinians have insisted that work also continue on the Erez Industrial Zone. In doing so, Yaron explained, the Palestinians demonstrate they wish to drag their feet, while Israel wants to move forward and allow the passage of goods from Erez to Ashkelon, the West Bank, and other destinations. Yaron said Wolfensohn promised to speed up the delivery of USD 50 million to the GOI in return for the building of the new passage for goods at Erez. Yaron suggested that the best solution would be for USAID to turn the USD 50 million over to the GOI so that it can use USD 30 million to procure scanners and other U.S. technology through its defense procurement agency in New York, and use the remaining USD 20 million to cover infrastructure and operational costs. Conversely, Yaron expressed concern that if USAID used its standard procedures for allotting the USD 50 million, the acquisition process could be dragged out and end up complicated by questions about who signs the contracts. Yaron said he is ready to work with USAID. 6. (C) Yaron said that the GOI will improve the Karni passage to ensure that Palestinian goods will cross from the Gaza Strip to the West Bank "in a very short time," with the main passage running from Karni to Tarkumiya, south of Hebron. He cautioned that GOI efforts to fulfill Dahlan's demand for "door-to-door" service are contingent on the maintenance of security in the area "for months" after disengagement. Israel, he said, is ready "in principle" to fulfill Dahlan's request, but needs time and equipment. Delivery of the USD 50 million in the near term would be helpful. Palestinian observance of Israel's security needs would be crucial. Yaron said he told Wolfensohn that it does not matter what kind of checks the Palestinians perform on their side of the Gaza border -- Israel cannot rely on them. ============================================= ============== YARON PROMISES TO THINK CREATIVELY TO RESOLVE RAFAH IMPASSE ============================================= ============== 7. (C) Yaron stressed that it is in Israel's interest to leave Philadelphi as soon as possible -- possibly before the Israeli holidays in October. He mused that Israel might be completely out of the Gaza Strip within two months, as long as the parties reach agreement on the establishment of an Israeli-controlled border crossing at Kerem Shalom, at the intersection of the Israeli, Egyptian and Gazan borders. Yaron said that after Israeli troops pull out of Philadelphi, Israel wants to build a new terminal at Kerem Shalom that will service goods and people. He said it could be completed in a short time, as long as there are no problems with the customs envelope arrangement under which Israel retains customs and security control of entry to Gaza. In the GOI's view, however, the Palestinians cannot accept separate customs envelopes in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, and Yaron indicated that Israel will use the threat of abrogating the customs union to press the Palestinians to agree to a Kerem Shalom crossing. Yaron said the GOI has made it clear to the Palestinians that Israel is ready to allow the Palestinians to transport goods into and through Israel "without checking -- at least for the beginning" -- as long as the Palestinians continue to accept a customs envelope including Gaza for which Israel retains control. The GOI would be willing to call the Kerem Shalom access point a "temporary terminal," and then decide its ultimate fate in the future. 8. (C) In the meantime, Yaron said, Israel could not discuss third-party involvement at the Rafah terminal. Yaron said the best compromise Israel could accept would be to open the temporary terminal in Kerem Shalom, and then allow construction of a seaport in Gaza. Then, after a year, the two sides could assess the seaport in Gaza and make decisions. 9. (C) A/S Welch and Ambassador Kurtzer suggested to Yaron that proceeding according to current plans will likely not satisfy Palestinian desires to see real, measurable changes in their situation. While Israel will have withdrawn from the Gaza Strip, Israeli officials will still be checking goods and persons crossing even the Gaza border with Egypt. A/S Welch and the Ambassador urged Yaron to think creatively so that Israel will be able to maintain the customs duty, revenue collection and tariff code provisions of the customs envelope -- and its focus on security -- while demonstrating tangibly that the situation at Rafah has changed for the Palestinians as a result of disengagement. They suggested that the GOI consider further how Israeli and Egyptian security interests coincide as a result of disengagement, and how Egypt might share Israel's interest in enforcing the security aspects of the passage of goods and people across Rafah. A creative solution, including a third party role, should be able to demonstrate change at Rafah, while addressing Israeli security concerns, possibly through technological solutions at the Erez and Karni crossings into Israel as a discreet backstop. Yaron acknowledged that, after considering all the options, his experts had concluded that a security regime involving Palestinians checking goods and persons under Egyptian supervision was Israel's "second best option" and promised to "think about it" as a possible way ahead to the Rafah issue. 10. (U) This cable was cleared by Assistant Secretary David Welch. ********************************************* ******************** Visit Embassy Tel Aviv's Classified Website: http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/nea/telaviv You can also access this site through the State Department's Classified SIPRNET website. ********************************************* ******************** KURTZER
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04