Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05WARSAW3151 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05WARSAW3151 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Warsaw |
| Created: | 2005-08-19 09:10:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | ECON EFIN PL EUN |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 05 WARSAW 003151 SIPDIS STATE FOR EUR/NCE TARA ERATH AND MICHAEL SESSUMS USDOC FOR 4232/ITA/MAC/EUR/JBURGESS AND MWILSON TREASURY FOR OASIA ERIC MEYER AND MATTHEW GAERTNER FRANKFURT FOR TREASURY JIM WALLAR E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: ECON, EFIN, PL, EUN SUBJECT: Economic Impact of EU Accession on Poland CORRECTION TO WARSAW 3130/3131, PARA 26, LAST SENTENCE. This cable is sensitive but unclassified and NOT for Internet distribution. ------- Summary ------- 1. (SUB) Sixteen months after Poland's EU accession, post surveyed a number of government officials and economic experts on the impact of accession. Despite some caveats, there appears to be consensus that Poland has adapted smoothly to the EU's common market. Dramatic export growth has fueled economic expansion even while the zloty has significantly appreciated. Meanwhile, inflation is under control, foreign investment is on the rise, and unemployment is beginning to drop off. Nevertheless, in many ways it is too early to evaluate the effect of accession. It remains to be seen whether Poland will be able to sustain economic growth, cope with continuing emigration, and smoothly conform to some of the EU's more problematic regulations. However, on the eve of parliamentary and presidential elections, economic experts remain optimistic about Poland's future prospects in the EU's open market. End summary. -------- Currency -------- 2. (SUB) A key development in the Polish economy over the past year and a half has been the significant strengthening of the zloty. Fueled by surging Polish exports, the zloty experienced sustained growth from March 2004 to March 2005 against both the dollar and the euro. In this 12-month period, the zloty appreciated by 24.6 percent against the dollar, according to Polish government data. Since April 2005, however, the zloty has weakened somewhat, in step with the weakening Euro. 3. (SBU) Meanwhile, the National Bank (NBP) hopes to keep Poland on track for rapid Euro adoption. NBP macroeconomic specialist Lucyna Sztaba said the Bank should enter the eurozone as soon as possible, though strong government support will be necessary to do so. The Bank initially set the goal of adopting the euro in 2008-2009, though Sztaba acknowledges 2008 may now be out of reach. The National Bank is concerned that Poland will be left behind in the race for investment by countries such as Slovakia and the Baltics, which are further along with preparations for the euro. Sztaba thinks the next government--expected to be a coalition of the Citizens' Platform (PO) and Law and Justice (PiS) parties--may not be as keen on catching up, with PiS somewhat opposed and PO reportedly ambivalent about quickly joining the euro zone. One of the arguments being used against rapid euro adoption is a recent IMF report suggesting the euro is not as important for Poland as for its neighbors because its market is so much larger. --------------- Economic Growth --------------- 4. (SBU) The Polish economy expanded rapidly in the months prior to EU accession, with 6.9 percent annualized GDP growth in first quarter 2004. This growth, which was accompanied by a three percent real increase in salaries in the same quarter, may have been fueled in part by consumers' increased demand for durable goods in anticipation of EU accession-related price increases. 5. (SBU) GDP growth continued after accession, though at a more modest 3-4 percent pace. The driving force behind this growth was agriculture and food processing, which benefited from stronger-than-expected demand for Polish products in the EU, an effect amplified by the weakness of the zloty at the time of accession. In 2004, food exports to EU-15 countries increased by 60 percent. Poland also benefited from nearly EUR 1.6 billion in net EU transfer payments in 2004, a figure the Poles expect to more than double in 2005. First quarter 2005 statistics estimate growth at three percent, which represents a slight slowing of the initial post-accession export surge, due in part to the strengthening zloty. Consensus estimates put Poland's GDP growth in 2005 and 2006 in the 4-5 percent range. ------------ Unemployment ------------ 6. (SBU) Analysts agree it is too soon for EU accession to have had a dramatic impact on Poland's high unemployment rate, which has hovered around 19 percent since 2002. Economic analyst Bohdan Wyznikiewicz thinks the Polish work force is currently in its second major phase of restructuring since the fall of communism. Labor productivity is increasing rapidly, and workers continue to leave farms. Roughly 16.5 percent of the work force is now employed in agriculture, down from 20 percent in the mid- 1990's. 7. (SBU) Unemployment fell from 20.6 to 19.5 percent in the months leading up to accession, but the rate remained stable for the rest of 2004. In the first half of 2005, however, the unemployment rate has dropped from 19.5 to 18.0 percent. Together, the 2.6 percent decrease in unemployment since the beginning of 2004 is the most significant drop since 1997. Analysts suggest that increasing demand for Polish exports, coupled with opportunities for migration, should contribute to a continuing decline. --------- Inflation --------- 8. (SBU) Post-accession inflation was one of the most feared consequences of joining the EU in Poland, and 2004 statistics bear out that a greater-than-expected inflationary effect--averaging 4-5 percent (annualized) in the months immediately following accession--was observed. Price increases were driven by EU demand for agricultural products, which had a dramatic effect on certain goods. (For example, sugar prices rose 67 percent; beef prices 40 percent.) Overall, food prices increased by 7.8 percent, which had a powerful effect on public perceptions given the 30 percent proportion of Polish household expenditures devoted to food purchases. External factors--in particular, high oil prices--had an effect as well. Only a few prices, mainly for technology and clothing, fell. 9. (SBU) In 2005, in contrast, prices again stabilized as the market quickly adjusted to the new export dynamics. Food prices actually dropped in February-April 2005, due in part to the stronger zloty. Current expectations are for continued price stability, with an end-of-year outcome perhaps below the National Bank's forecast of two percent. Many analysts suggested 1.2 percent annual inflation at year end is possible. This would be comfortably below the government's long-term 2.5 percent target, in compliance with the Maastricht guidelines. ------------------ Foreign Investment ------------------ 10. (SBU) Foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows into Poland increased by 22.4 percent in 2004 to reach USDOL7.9 billion, the highest level since the year 2000. Polish Foreign Investment Agency (PAIiIZ) specialist Aleksandra Prachowska explains that the current inflows primarily represent reinvestment, since most major foreign players have long since entered the Polish market. 11. (SBU) According to Prachowska, the effect of EU accession on FDI is unclear and nearly impossible to measure. Statistics cannot yet be gathered on investment since accession, as new investments will take several years to be realized and measured. However, Prachowska said she has personally noted a sharp increase in the number of inquiries from potential investors since accession. It remains to be seen whether these enquiries will translate into actual deals, but PAIiIZ Director Andrzej Zdebski is confident that 2005 FDI would top the 2004 level. 12. (SBU) According to a recently-published report by Ernst and Young, Poland is tied with Germany as the most attractive destination for foreign investment in Europe. The availability of cheap land and a large, relatively skilled labor force--in contrast to some neighboring countries, like Slovakia, that may soon face labor shortages- -are among Polish strengths that are contributing to the increase in FDI. However, inadequate infrastructure and a high level of bureaucracy were highlighted in the report as areas needing significant improvement. 13. (SBU) Officials said the lack of centralization in the Polish investment system is also a liability. The Slovakian government's investment agency, for example, is prepared to immediately discuss incentive packages with firms considering investment, while PAIiIZ does not have the same capability and occasionally has difficulty cooperating with regional governments. PiS and PO economic advisers Kazimierz Marcinkiewicz and Rafal Antczak, who are expected to play an influential role in Polish economic policy following this year's election, both agreed that reforming PAIiIZ and elevating the organization to a higher hierarchical level are among their priorities, alongside infrastructure development. --------- Migration --------- 14. (SBU) Gloomy predictions of a massive brain drain and high levels of emigration to the EU countries that opened their borders to Polish labor--the UK, Ireland, and Sweden - -have for the most part failed to materialize. Emigration levels from Poland have been below expectation, in contrast to several of the other new member states, like Lithuania, where outflows have surprised observers. 15. (SBU) Analysts are optimistic that migration to Western Europe will be a transitory phenomenon, as both prices and salary levels in Poland catch up to the EU average in the long term. They hope for a "circular migration" effect, in which Polish workers return home after gaining experience and skills abroad. 16. (SBU) According to the Poles, migration from the new EU member states has had a positive economic impact on the host nation, largely due to the UK's low unemployment rates. Roughly 100,000 Poles have registered as workers in the UK since accession, about one-third of which were already in the country, many probably working illegally. These workers have pumped PLN 1.7 billion into the British economy, and there is no evidence of a "flood" of immigrants into Britain. There is some concern about "brain waste," which occurs when highly qualified workers from new member states work in unskilled labor positions in the UK. However, local Polish observers are encouraged by the fact that Poles working in the UK are increasingly employed in the business and management sector, as opposed to unskilled positions in agriculture and fishing. 17. (SBU) Concerns about a brain drain remain alive in the medical field. With Poland's nursing schools now turning out drastically fewer graduates than they did several years ago, and anecdotal reports of nurses moving abroad, some worry that loss of skilled workers to Britain and other EU states could result in a shortage of medical staff at home. Still, the Polish government remains eager to open more borders to Polish workers within the EU, in particular hoping to encourage Germany--still the number- one destination for Polish workers--to allow Polish workers to cross the border freely. However, many Polish economists believe that Germany will remain largely closed to Polish labor for the entire seven-year transitional period. ----- Trade ----- 18. (SBU) The biggest story of the first year after EU accession for Poland was a dramatic (38 percent) overall increase in agro-food exports in 2004. Exports of meat, dairy products, fresh produce, and sugar rose by 54 percent to EUR 3.4 billion. This overall increase in agro-food exports outpaced growth in imports (27 percent), more than doubling Poland's positive trade balance in the sector to over one billion euro. 19. (SBU) Polish exports in general increased by 30 percent in 2004 (measured in zlotys). The effect was not limited to trade within the EU: while exports to EU countries rose by 27 percent, exports to developing countries rose by 46 percent. In fact, the most dramatic increase in trade relations in 2004 was an unexpected 77 percent increase in exports to Russia. According to Wyznikiewicz, this effect is probably unrelated to EU expansion and rather seems to stem from an earlier communist tradition of economic exchange with Russia 20. (SBU) Dynamic export growth in the first five months of 2005 has continued in dollar and euro terms, though not so in zlotys because the currency has strengthened so significantly in the past year. Exports to the EU in January-May 2005 increased 22 percent in dollar terms from the same period in 2004 but decreased one percent when measured in zlotys. Still, increases in exports to developing countries, primarily in Eastern Europe, fueled an overall 3.7 percent export increase in zloty terms (28 percent in dollars). Poland's trade balance continues to improve, with export growth significantly outpacing import growth in this period (imports increased 16 percent in dollar terms but dropped six percent in zlotys). ------------- Energy Sector ------------- 21. (SBU) One of the thorniest issues of EU accession has been the resolution of long-term contracts in the energy sector. Over half of the energy on the Polish market is procured by the government at an above-market rate established by long-term contracts signed years ago. The EU is insisting that Poland dissolve these contracts, arguing they constitute an inadmissible form of public support for the industry. The government has been working to resolve the issue through a new compensation bill, but disagreements prevented it from being passed this term. The PO party recently put forth its position on the issue, which advocated privatization of the state-owned energy companies and the use of the proceeds as lump-sum compensation for canceling the lucrative contracts. 22. (SBU) But officials the Ministry of Economy were skeptical that such a plan would work, suggesting that the likely proceeds from privatization would not cover the high costs of compensation (up to PLN 26 billion). They think that ultimately a surcharge may have to be applied to consumers' electricity bills to pay for the compensation, but this will not raise prices because consumers are currently paying a surcharge to cover the above-market price of the contracted energy. Competition is expected to put downward pressure on prices, but in the long term prices are nevertheless expected to rise to the levels prevailing in the rest of the EU. ----------------- Emissions Trading ----------------- 23. (SBU) One of the major anticipated benefits of EU accession for Poland was access to the EU emissions trading market, which was expected to bring in billions of dollars due to Poland's relatively low emissions levels (initially estimated at 30-40 percent below the country's allocation). However, bureaucratic delays and disorganization have clouded the issue. The European Commission allocated Poland 16 percent less emissions for the next three years than the Polish government requested, partially because two government ministries separately issued conflicting sets of data on the country's emissions. Rather than cut its proposed internal allocations by 16 percent across the board, the government is now in the midst of a controversial effort to reallocate the new emissions limit among relevant industries, several of which want to expand production. This may make it difficult to stay within the limits. The thorny reallocation process, as well as the process of setting up a new emissions administrator, is delaying entry to the emissions trading system. 24. (SBU) Boguslaw Debski of the Environmental Protection Institute said he is hopeful Poland will be ready to trade emissions by the end of 2005, but he admitted there is a chance the process will not be completed until next year, a situation he said would be "tragic." Debski said that overall, Poland will certainly have a surplus of emissions allocations available to trade, but a number of individual producers fear they may exceed their quotas. ------- Comment ------- 26. (SBU) Every contact consulted had positive things to say about the economic impact of EU accession in Poland; even the overall slowing of economic growth this year was interpreted primarily as a sign of stabilization rather than as a cause for concern. Analysts are particularly heartened by the incipient signs of decreasing unemployment, as well as by the rapid return of stable prices. But several tricky regulatory issues remain to be resolved, and their progress- -much like progress toward adopting the euro--is likely to rely on the incoming government's degree of motivation. While it is still too early to draw precise conclusions about the full impact of the EU accession on Poland's economy, it seems clear that the doomsday forecasts made before accession have not materialized. HILLAS
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04