Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05GABORONE1165 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05GABORONE1165 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Gaborone |
| Created: | 2005-08-16 11:44:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | ECON EINV PGOV BTIO BC Economy |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 GABORONE 001165 SIPDIS AF/S FOR MUNCY EB/CIP FOR CARNEGIE E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: ECON, EINV, PGOV, BTIO, BC, Economy SUBJECT: PRIVATIZATION PROGRESSING SLOWLY REF: GABORONE 532 1. SUMMARY. Privatization in Botswana is moving in the right direction - slowly. Mr. Joshua Galeforolwe, CEO of the Public Enterprise Evaluation and Privatization Agency (PEEPA), described to Charge and Emboffs the political, institutional, and economic challenges facing the privatization movement in an August 15 meeting. Support for privatization needs to be consolidated within the Government and cultivated within the general public. Separation of planning and implementation of privatization policy, as well as pending regulatory reforms and lack of project management capacity, have complicated privatization efforts to date. Botswana's narrowly based economy, and consequently limited capital market, has obstructed progress as well. Nonetheless, Mr. Galeforolwe expressed confidence that, with the assistance of development partners such as the United States, Botswana would succeed in putting privatization on a faster track. END SUMMARY PRIVATIZATION OFF TO A SLOW START 2. The Government of Botswana established the Public Enterprise Evaluation and Privatization Agency (PEEPA) in 2000 to facilitate efforts to develop a stronger and more diverse private sector in Botswana. PEEPA, led by CEO Mr. Joshua Galeforolwe, advises the GOB on divestiture of state-owned enterprises, the creation of public-private partnerships, and outsourcing services provided by the Government, in addition to performance monitoring of parastatals. After three years of deliberation and drafting, the Cabinet adopted in March 2005 the Privatization Master Plan prepared by PEEPA. That document listed public enterprises that were feasible to privatize, those that required some restructuring first, and others that were not suitable for privatization. The Plan anticipated two to three major privatizations each year for the next four years. 3. So far, however, progress has been slow. PEEPA hoped that the privatization of Air Botswana would start the ball rolling on divestiture. The GOB's initial attempt to divest from the airline sidelined PEEPA and, perhaps not surprisingly, failed to attract an investor. The Government has returned to the drawing board and is looking at alternatives to private ownership of the airline, such as franchising. In the meantime, it has started developing privatization strategies for other enterprises. Mr. Galeforolwe explained, for example, that Mackenzie and Company had just completed a feasibility study for the privatization of the Botswana Telecommunications Corporation, which he thought could occur within two or three years. A state-run insurance scheme, a tannery, and two publicly owned banks are all slated for privatization during the next two years. NEED TO CONSOLIDATE GOVERNMENT SUPPORT 4. Although the Government generally recognizes the value of privatization to invigorate the private sector, Mr. Galeforolwe described some of the biggest obstacles to this process in Botswana as political. Although lawmakers had recognized the need for legislation on public-private partnerships, for example, they had demurred on PEEPA's proposal for legislation on divesture of state-owned assets. Contrary to the general trend toward privatization, the National Assembly passed a Telecommunications Act in January 2005 that actually restored to the Ministry of Communication, Science and Technology regulatory powers that had previously been granted to the Botswana Telecommunications Authority (reftel). If the government expects to attract private investors to participate in the privatization of the Botswana Telecommunications Corporation, PEEPA will have to convince Government to reverse that decision to ensure investor confidence in the autonomy of the industry's regulator. NEED TO GENERATE POPULAR SUPPORT 5. Not only is the Government's commitment to privatization patchy, public opinions on this subject are generally uninformed and antagonistic. Mr. Galeforolwe explained that, apart from some economically savvy young people, the public tended to equate privatization with "giving away the family silver." At its genesis, PEEPA had requested that the Government fund a mass media campaign to educate Batswana about privatization but was denied. Given the multiple demands on the Government's attention, this left the field of public discussion over privatization to the opposition parties who have employed populist arguments against it. INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT A HINDRANCE 6. In addition to political challenges, the institutional environment within which PEEPA operates poses some difficulties. Separation of the development of privatization strategies (PEEPA) from the implementation of these plans once approved (ministries), impedes rapid progress, Galeforolwe argued. PEEPA's lack of authority is illustrated in the fact that the Government's March 2004 liquidation of shares in Anglo- American, its sale of debt owed by parastatals, and its early attempts at privatizing Air Botswana did not flow from PEEPA recommendations. Not surprisingly, ministries are often reluctant to relinquish to the private sector or to an independent regulatory body functions it has controlled heretofore. PEEPA is armed only with its powers of persuasion to elicit cooperation from these agencies. 7. Even when ministries accept the logic behind privatization, the regulatory environment governing a particular service provider might not be suitable for private investment. In such cases, some regulatory reforms or other restructuring is needed before the private sector can be expected to take interest. Efforts to encourage outsourcing have run up against lack of project management capacity within Government entities. NEED FOR FDI VERSUS NEED FOR LOCAL PARTICIPATION 8. Botswana's small, narrowly based economy has complicated privatization plans. Unlike in many countries that preceded it down the road of privatization, Botswana's domestic capital market is not sufficient to absorb assets liquidated by the state. This has forced Botswana to woo foreign investors, which requires the demonstration of an attractive legal, policy and regulatory environment. 9. At the same time, the Government must demonstrate that privatization will benefit Batswana as well as potential foreign investors. To that end, the Ministry of Finance and Development Planning has stated that while foreign investment will be welcomed, the Government may give preference to local firms and investors and restrict "foreign participation in certain companies for strategic or other reasons that will be considered on a case-by- case basis." COMMENT 10. Consistent with our ongoing focus on promoting economic diversification through trade and foreign direct investment, Mission will enhance our advocacy in favor of privatization as an essential ingredient in sustaining economic growth. Given PEEPA's efforts toward privatization of the Botswana Telecommunications Corporation, a round table discussion hosted by EB/CIP/BA on competitive telecom markets, fair and transparent regulatory policies, and privatization could be a timely and effective intervention in support of privatization in Botswana. AROIAN
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04