US embassy cable - 05AMMAN6440

Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.

MEDIA REACTION ON IRAN

Identifier: 05AMMAN6440
Wikileaks: View 05AMMAN6440 at Wikileaks.org
Origin: Embassy Amman
Created: 2005-08-11 08:59:00
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Tags: KMDR JO
Redacted: This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks.
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

UNCLAS AMMAN 006440 
 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR NEA/ARN, NEA/PA, NEA/AIA, INR/NESA, R/MR, 
I/GNEA, B/BXN, B/BRN, NEA/PPD, NEA/IPA FOR ALTERMAN 
USAID/ANE/MEA 
LONDON FOR GOLDRICH 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
 
TAGS: KMDR JO 
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION ON IRAN 
 
                        Summary 
 
-- Lead story in all papers today, August 11, 
highlights the continued violence in Iraq, this time 
claiming the lives of six American soldiers.  Another 
lead story reports on the signing of the bilateral 
extradition treaty between Jordan and the United 
Kingdom, with speculation that Jordan is going to ask 
for the extradition of the Islamist Al-Qaeda leader 
known as Abu Qutadah who is wanted in Jordan and who 
lives in the United Kingdom. 
 
                 Editorial Commentary 
 
-- "Iran's nuclear issue and Israel's nuclear weapons" 
 
Daily columnist Mohammad Amayreh writes on the op-ed 
page of semi-official, influential Arabic daily Al-Rai 
(08/11):  "The controversial Iranian nuclear issue is 
worrisome for Washington and its allies, and 
Washington is trying to avoid any potential threats to 
itself and its European allies, but mostly to its 
foremost ally in the region, Israel.  Washington's and 
Tel Aviv's worry about Iran's nuclear activities is 
unfounded and unjustified because both of them have a 
large arsenal of nuclear weapons while it has not yet 
been proven that Iran is capable of producing nuclear 
weapons or that its nuclear program targets them. 
Washington and its allies insist on placing the 
Iranian nuclear installation under IAEA monitoring, 
but, at the same time, they say nothing about the 
nuclear bombs that exist Israel or about its very 
ambitious nuclear program.  This in itself reflects a 
clear bias in favor of Israel and the use of double 
standards in handling such a very sensitive issue, not 
to mention the injustice that developing countries 
feel when they see certain countries owning advanced 
nuclear weapons while others are being denied this 
right; and all this is being done in the name of 
international legitimacy." 
HALE 

Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04