Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05LJUBLJANA553 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05LJUBLJANA553 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Ljubljana |
| Created: | 2005-08-04 07:51:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PREL KUNR SI |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L LJUBLJANA 000553
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/05/2005
TAGS: PREL, KUNR, SI
SUBJECT: SLOVENIA'S FM RUPEL ON UNSC REFORM
REF: A. LJUBLJANA 510
B. STATE 132429
Classified By: COM Thomas B. Robertson for Reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)
1. (C) In a meeting with FM Dimitrij Rupel on another topic
July 29, COM raised the issue of Slovenia's position on the
G-4 proposal for UN Security Council reform. Rupel was
expecting the question and paused before answering that
Slovenia was still working to find the right position for
itself. Rupel also said there were less politics involved
than it may appear and that there were many "relations and
associations" Slovenia wanted to keep strong that go beyond
"temporary situations." He was open to any insights into the
US position that would also ensure or promote Slovenia's
interests. Rupel added that while Slovenia will not
co-sponsor the G-4 resolution, it is leaning towards any
option that ensures the survival of the eastern European
group.
2. (C) Given all the competing interests, Rupel said he
had no illusions about how this would ultimately play out if
the G-4 proposal were brought to a vote. He suggested it
would be a waste of energy to get "too emotional about
something that in the end might be a non-event." COM thanked
Rupel for his practical approach, and stressed the USG view
of UNSC reform is that much more consideration must be given
to potential implications of any plan before a decision can
be made, and he urged Rupel to, at a minimum, abstain should
a vote on the G-4 proposal be taken.
ROBERTSON
NNNN
2005LJUBLJ00553 - Classification: CONFIDENTIAL
v1.6.2
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04