Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05DHAKA3765 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05DHAKA3765 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Dhaka |
| Created: | 2005-08-03 09:29:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | ELAB ETRD PHUM PGOV BG Labor Issues |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 DHAKA 003765 SIPDIS SENSITIVE DEPT PASS USTR DEPT PASS LABOR COLLECTIVE E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: ELAB, ETRD, PHUM, PGOV, BG, Labor Issues SUBJECT: MANAGEMENT AND LABOR ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EPZ LAW REF: DHAKA 3695 1. (SBU) Summary: BEPZA Chairman Hossain briefs investors on the progress in implementing the EPZ law and listened to worker's complaints about management's actions. End Summary. 2. (SBU) On July 30, laboff attended the Bangladesh Export Processing Zone Authority (BEPZA) monthly meeting, chaired by Executive Director Mohammad Zakir Hossain, for investors and factory managers at the Chittagong Export Processing Zone (CEPZ). This month's event was to focus on the progress of implementation of the 2004 law which permitted limited freedom of association in Bangladesh's EPZs. Also in attendance at this nearly two-hour meeting was the American Center for Labor Solidarity (ACILS) Field Representative, Rob Wayss. 3. (SBU) Before a room of 150 investors and managers, Hossain discussed the general labor-management relationship and the ongoing Worker Recreation and Welfare Committee (WRWC) elections. He said that in the CEPZ, 107 of the 123 eligible factories have had elections. He said that because the laborers are not literate, we must train them and increase their understanding. While there have been exceptions, generally the elections have been free and fair, he said, and many laborers in the WRWCs are sitting and talking with management. He urged investors to talk with the workers, saying that "you can solve any problem" before it gets out of hand. He noted that at least one of the WRWC conveners has left their WRWC for health reasons but said that factory management has to seek his permission to fire anyone. 4. (SBU) Hossain expressed concern that some workers are being lured to talk to outside labor activists but "we are not going to allow that." Perhaps due to this outside influence, there is a communication gap between management and labor, with some workers asking, "Why should we work when we are members of the WRWC now?" Saying that BEPZA has hired "conciliators" who will try to bridge the labor - management gap, he told managers that they needed to have the "proper human resource" people in their factories as well, to accept the WRWC workers in the proper manner, and to gain their confidence. 5. (SBU) Opening the floor to questions, the investors and managers raised a number of WRWC related issues and allegations: --WRWC conveners are interfering with factory's operations; --Discipline is still the right of the factory owner; --Some workers have assaulted managers; --Workers have gone out on wildcat work stoppages in violation of the EPZ law; --Workers are illegally meeting with other workers outside of the zone, WRWC convenors are meeting with other WRWC conveners from other factories and with conveners from other EPZs; --Outsiders are collecting money from the workers, which BEPZA should stop; and --What is BEPZA doing to respond to the AFL-CIO petition before the USTR? 6. (SBU) The President of Youngone, Peter Bauer, asked Wayss why AFL-CIO had resubmitted the GSP petition before the USTR. Wayss responded that, along with specific instances of WRWC election problems, there is no due process system of any labor-management dispute, that companies have refused to comply with BEPZA's own rules on the status of workers, and there have been mass dismissals of workers. He said that these reports have been verified and BEPZA notified. Hossain contradicted Wayss, saying that these are "sweeping statements" but we need time to be "understood by the WRWC and the workers." He said that the elections have been meticulously conducted, but "give us time to complete the elections." He said that "we have to be alert to outsiders," as they may have political reasons to mislead workers, and gave as an example an ACILS local organizing partner, the Bangladesh Independent Garment Workers Union Federation (BIGUF). He concluded by saying that workers are doing illegal strikes, which must stop as workers cannot "take the law into their own hands." 7. (SBU) Laboff attended a second meeting with BEPZA's Councilators, Executive Chairman Hossain and staff, and WRWC convenors. The 90-minute meeting started with Hossain telling the 30 concilators assigned to the CEPZ that they need to learn the EPZ law, specifically sections one and two which define what issues the WRWC convenors may raise with management. To the convenors, Hossain told them that they need to be more responsible than regular workers, cannot associate with outside people, should not interfere with management's administration and should not use violence. 8. (SBU) Hossain opened the floor to questions. Among the issues and allegations raised by the convenors were: --management's use of bad language towards workers; --30 of the 60 convernors in the room had not received a copy of the 2004 EPZ law; --management ignoring convenors and refusing to meet with them; --management forcing convenors to travel as a method to convince them to resign from the WRWC, while others who have resigned altogether for the same reasons have not gotten their resignation pay; --several instances where workers and convenors after several years, have not received an appointment letter; --lack of technical assistance in developing the WRWC internal procedures and policies as required in the law; and --management's insistance that WRWC members have no special rights. When a WRWC member saw a supervisor abuse a co-worker and objected, the supervisor insisted that the WRWC convenor pay attention to their own work. 9. (SBU) Hossain asked the convenors to write him a letter detailing the problems, telling them that his authority was limited is trying to persuade the investors and managers to implement the law and follow BEPZA's rules. He noted that management won't meet with many convenors but asked them to be patient while he solves that situation. In the mean time, he asked for "no violence." He said that there are very few places where they would have the opportunity to speak to the authority so directly, but here they could. 10. (SBU) Among the concilators, only one person had a comment: factory workers and convenors do not accept them as a neutral party. 11. (SBU) Comment: BEPZA deserves praise for inviting ACILS to the investor's monthly meeting, and for meeting with workers to listen to their complaints. However, EPZ law implementation problems apparently continue with no apparent strategy for dealing effectively with labor management situations such as Ring Shine (reftel), or employing the concilators to maximum effect. The concilators, none of whom laboff spoke to had any labor, human relations or dispute resolution training, have been given only seven days training by BEPZA. CHAMMAS
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04