Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05ANKARA4456 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05ANKARA4456 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Ankara |
| Created: | 2005-08-02 08:20:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PREL PGOV PINS PHUM TU |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ANKARA 004456 SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/01/2015 TAGS: PREL, PGOV, PINS, PHUM, TU SUBJECT: TURKEY'S SOUTHEAST: ALEVI COMMUNITIES SEEK HIGHER PROFILE Classified By: (U) Polcounselor John Kunstadter; reasons: E.O. 12958 1. 4 (b,d). 1. (U) This is a Consulate Adana cable. 2. (C) Summary: Alevis in southeastern Turkey of varying ethnic backgrounds recently have offered useful insight into the ongoing Anatolia-wide debate about the future shape of their faith and how they feel that the EU accession process might impact on that community-wide discourse. End Summary. 3. (C) In a July 19 meeting in Adana with visiting Turkey desk officer Baxter Hunt, a Kurdish (not Zaza) Alevi contact who was born in Elazig explained his background as an active officer in the Cukurova region's Pir Sultana organization and past national Pir Sultana executive board. He said that he was a self-described modernist in the current community debate. He said that there were considerable Alevi desires, if necessary, through the European Court of Human Rights and explicit EU demands to Turkey in the accession process, that the Religious Affairs Department either be dissolved or changed to include support for Turkey's Alevis. The Alevi contact said that what he counted as Turkey's 12 million-member Alevi community will resist what he called the "Sunni Religious Affairs Department's assimilation policy." (Note: This figure is a matter of debate, even among Alevis. An Alevi contact in Diyarbakir on July 26 asserted to AMCON Adana PO that there were 25 to 30 million Alevis in Anatolia, with other Alevi friends of his suggesting later that such a number is exaggerated even if it included the many Alevis who do not regularly go to a cem or dede-led home services in urban areas, but that there are many more Alevis than the 6 to 7 million that Sunni activists claim. Official but confidential Turkish State figures, based on detailed family SIPDIS registers, show seven million Alevis in Turkey. End Note) 4. (C) He also described a generational discussion which has developed within the Alevi community, which he described as unique to Anatolia, as to whether the Alevi faith should have a place in the Islamic community. He said that older, more traditional Alevis, even though one would not find a Koran in their house or their praying in a mosque, still considered Aleviism as a faith with its roots in Islam. He noted, however, for example, that almost all Alevis feel that the fourth caliph, Osman, altered the original text of the Koran and that they therefore reject it as a spiritual guideline. Younger Alevis, he said, increasingly see their Alevi faith as one based on humanism which "has no room to grow and express itself if bound by the broad confines of Islam or interpreted primarily by dedes (traditional Alevi community religious leaders)." The Alevi contact also asserted that Alevis need groups of at least twelve to perform some common and important rituals, which usually are performed in a cem evi, and as a result, require group rights as well as individual freedoms to worship. He said that he had pointed this out to Council of Europe and European parliament figures in Strasbourg in late 2004 meetings. 5. (C) Somewhat in contrast, Diyarbakir-based Alevi contacts from the Pir Sultana association described their perception of the debate, which they agreed was ongoing in the Alevi faith in slightly different terms. They explained that the Diyarbakir Alevi community, whose active membership stood at about 12,000 strong, had mixed roots in Zaza "Cult of the Angels" Alevism, Turkmen practices from the late Ottoman era whose community migrated to Diyarbakir and southeast Anatolia before the First World War, and many Kurdish Alevis who speak the Kermanji variant of Kurdish, and have ritual traditions akin to their western Anatolian Turkish-speaking kin. All lamented the lack of a cem evi in Diyarbakir and complained loudly about how a Diyarbakir municipal decision in 2003 had allotted them land for a cem evi, but that a new religious-affairs department-linked religious activities zoning board put in place in the governor's office during the AK party era had blocked any construction permits for the site, claming it suitable for a mosque which Alevis, as Muslims in the Religious Affairs Department's assessment, were free to attend. 6. (C) The Diyarbakir Pir Sultana officials, which included a Zaza-speaking Kurdish president; Kermanji-speaking Kurdish deputy president; a Turkmen Turkish-speaking secretary and a Turkmen Turkish and Arabic-speaking dede, said that they were harder line toward the Religious Affairs Department "policy of assimilation which Prime Minister Erdogan is trying to force on us." They bristled when recalling past Erdogan characterizations of Aleviism as a culture rather than a religious faith and denounced an AKP government report to the EU referring to Alevis as minorities. While one member asserted that there were as many practicing Alevis as Sunni hanafi muslims (not everyone in the group agreed with this assertion), but you just could not count them in mosque gatherings, all agreed that the AKP government language was intended to marginalize their community in the EU's and other outsiders' eyes. Unlike the Cem Foundation, which they said had called for either the religious affairs department's dissolution or its inclusion of a new and autonomous Alevi branch, they said that the Pir Sultana foundation would accept nothing less than the end of the religious affairs department and its support for Sunni imams and compulsory religious education in Turkish public schools. 7. (C) The dede with the group also said that today's Alevi youth, after growing up with parents who had to hide their Alevi faith because of systematic state persecution in the 1970's and 1980's (he pointed to a wall poster displaying a picture of the 37 Alevi intellectuals killed in an arson attack on a hotel in Sivas in 1993 while saying this), were exploring their faith with more vigor than possible in Anatolia in the last 20-30 years and taking pride in their Alevi identity. That said, who would be the next generation's dedes, determined by blood line, is still unclear, he said. He described Alevi youth as very actively debating issues whether the Koran should be on an Alevi table (he said older Alevis accepted the Koran as an element of their religion's roots, but not a determining one), how Islam might confine the future of Islam, and whether and how Alevis should seek definitive religious rights for their community from the Turkish government. The dede said that he was not optimistic that the current AKP government which was so strongly steeped in Sunni hanafi tradition would relent in its "assimilation" policy. They cannot accept us because of independence of Alevi religious strictures and customs (like use of music, especially the saz, a lute-like instrument), gender equality, past political support of Ataturk, and use of cem evis rather than mosques. 8. (C) Like their Adana counterparts, the Diyarbakir Alevi groups described a feeling of empowerment first from Anatolian diaspora Alevis of different customs who now lived in western Europe and closely followed and actively participated in the Alevi-wide debate about its future path. They also said that these groups had offered them insight into the potential for change and autonomy they could win if working with EU governments to advocate religious freedom in Anatolia. This realization both strengthened their resolve in the face of perceived sunni persecution and rekindled interest and energy in charting a new course for the community which was based on their potential rather than the limits of what Sunnis in Anatolia were prepared to tolerate. MCELDOWNEY
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04