Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05PARIS5263 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05PARIS5263 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Paris |
| Created: | 2005-08-01 17:17:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PREL IS KPAL SY IR PTER PARM FR |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 PARIS 005263 SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/29/2015 TAGS: PREL, IS, KPAL, SY, IR, PTER, PARM, FR SUBJECT: PM SHARON VISIT HERALDS SYMBOLIC UPTURN IN FRENCH-ISRAELI RELATIONS Classified By: Political Minister Counselor Josiah Rosenblatt for reaso ns 1.4 (b) and (d) 1. (C) Summary and comment: Israeli PM Sharon's successful July 26-29 visit to France was marked by warm atmospherics and ostentatious emphasis on improving bilateral relations from both sides, with many French media outlets heralding a new "honeymoon" in French-Israeli relations. The GoF, in welcoming Sharon to Paris, stressed its support for Gaza disengagement, commitment to fighting anti-Semitism, and longtime friendship and "shared values" with Israel, while reiterating support for the roadmap and an independent Palestinian state. Sharon, for his part, paid effusive public tributes to Chirac, invited him to Israel, and stressed GoF-GoI agreement on issues like Syria and Iran. French MFA contacts described the visit as a success in largely symbolic terms, with both sides seeking to highlight the positive and not dwell on areas of disagreement, while not shifting from established positions. That said, the GoF appears to have recalibrated its public message on Gaza disengagement more in line with the U.S. focus on making disengagement a success, while highlighting the roadmap as offering a political perspective to Palestinians. The main topics of Sharon's discussions with Chirac and other senior French officials were Gaza disengagement, Syria/Lebanon, and Iran/EU-3 negotiations, with the MFA reporting a particular convergence of views on the latter two topics. Quai contacts told us they were struck particularly by Chirac's toughness on Syria, and noted that the GoF opted to raise what happens post-Gaza disengagement during the PM Villepin-Sharon discussion only. The sole deliverable from the visit was the GoF-proposed creation of a new France-Israel foundation, which will seek to improve Israel's public image in France, and vice-versa. End summary and comment. 2. (SBU) At the invitation of President Chirac, Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon visited France July 26 through July 29, his first visit to France since 2001. On July 27, Sharon had a working lunch with Chirac and had a separate meeting and working dinner with PM de Villepin; on July 28, he met with French FM Douste-Blazy and attended cultural events with French Jewish community groups. The two-hour-plus Chirac-Sharon meeting, which focused on bilateral ties and regional issues, was marked by exceptionally positive atmospherics. In public remarks, Sharon called Chirac "one of the world's great leaders," hailed French firmness on the Syria/Lebanon and Iran/EU-3 dossiers, and invited the French president to visit his ranch in the Negev. (MFA contacts confirmed that Chirac accepted the offer, and spontaneously offered to donate a French cow to Sharon's ranch, with cattle being an additional ice-breaking topic between the two leaders.) Chirac publicly offered Sharon "the warmest of welcomes" and applauded the Gaza disengagement plan as a "historic decision," reiterating that France would be side-by-side with the Israeli and Palestinian people in helping to relaunch the roadmap. PM de Villepin went further in projecting the image of a balanced French Middle East policy, declaring that, "France, with its unrelenting support for a balanced solution, will always be side-by-side with Israel, and all partisans for peace... France and Israel have the same passion for democracy and for liberty...on the basis of these shared values, it is up to us to continue and enrich our dialogue..." French media coverage of the visit was generally positive, with multiple references to a new "honeymoon" in French-Israeli relations after decades of strains, notwithstanding continuing bilateral differences on key issues like West Bank settlements and the security barrier. GAZA DISENGAGEMENT, HAMAS ---------------------- 3. (C) We received a brief readout of the Sharon-Chirac meeting from Diplomatic Advisor Maurice Gourdault-Montagne, and a more detailed briefing on the discussion topics from MFA Israel desk officer Etienne Chapon. Gourdault-Montagne characterized Chirac's talks with Sharon as highly positive, especially given that the visit was a delicate one for the GOF. Gourdault-Montagne added that Chirac had asked Sharon whether the Palestinians had an interest in sabotaging Gaza disengagement, to which the Israeli PM replied that he didn't know, but would implement the plan regardless. Chapon noted that although the Israeli PM, during his bilateral discussions, entered into less detail than the GoF had hoped on his plans for Gaza disengagement, Sharon left no doubt on the French side of his determination to implement the plan. Chapon said the GoF "got the message" from the U.S. on the need to focus on making Gaza disengagement a success, and took this line with Sharon; the planned Douste-Blazy visit to Israel and the Occupied Territories September 4-6 would be made in a similar spirit. Chapon added that the GoF chose to raise the issue of what happens "after Gaza withdrawal" during the Villepin-Sharon meeting only, as Chirac had wanted to avoid contention in his meeting with the Israeli PM. Chapon conceded that some in the GoF had worried whether Villepin, known for his passion on the Israeli-Palestinian issue, would press the point too harshly, but in the end, the PM handled the issue diplomatically. Sharon's response to Villepin was to note that we were still in a prelude to the roadmap, for which implementation was contingent on a complete halt to terrorism, confiscation of weapons, dismantlement of terrorist groups, and an end to incitement of hatred towards Israel. Chapon commented that the last condition listed by Sharon was new, and suggested a maximalist, hard-line approach on roadmap implementation. 4. (C) On Hamas, Chapon reported that Chirac defused the issue by reiterating its status as a "terrorist organization" during his discussion with Sharon and making clear that the GoF had no intention of talking to Hamas. Sharon, for his part, observed that PA President Abbas had committed a grave error in seeking accommodation with Hamas, which had been borne out by recent clashes between the two sides. Chapon added that FM Douste-Blazy took a more nuanced line with Sharon on Hamas; rather than stressing its status as a terrorist group, he pointed to the need to undermine Hamas' popular appeal by giving full support to the PA. SYRIA/LEBANON, HIZBALLAH ------------------------ 5. (C) Chapon described Syria/Lebanon and Iran/EU-3 negotiations as "honeymoon" topics between Chirac and Sharon, but noted that both sides stuck to generalities. Chapon stressed that Chirac and Sharon discussed Syria from the Lebanon angle, and agreed on the need to keep pressure on Damascus, while not addressing any new initiatives. Sharon commended Chirac for his cooperation with the U.S. on UNSCR 1559, and stressed the importance of full implementation. According to Chapon, Sharon described Hizballah as an "existential menace" to Israel, but did not appeal for Hizballah disarmament, nor did he ask the EU to list Hizballah as a terrorist organization -- two omissions which took the GoF by surprise. Chapon speculated that Hizballah was a case in which Israeli/French differences were well-established and perhaps not worth pressing during meetings intended to mend fences. He added that Chirac helped defuse the issue by stressing that the GoF was sending very firm messages to Iran to push Hizballah to moderate its behavior. Chirac also advised Sharon that it was Syria, not Iran, that was offering the bulk of external support to Hizballah; therefore external pressure should remain focused on Damascus. Chapon concluded that he and other MFA contacts were struck by the toughness of Chirac's message on Syria, which he dismissed as a "bad regime" which understands no one and does nothing to change its behavior. Chapon confirmed that Sharon raised concerns on Syria's support for Palestinian Islamic Jihad, to which Chirac assented. IRAN/EU-3 --------- 6. (C) Chapon reported that the Israeli PM thanked Chirac for the GoF's efforts to keep Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons and for keeping Israel informed of the progress of EU-3 negotiations. Sharon also reportedly described the EU-3 effort as the best possible option to contain Iran's nuclear ambitions. Describing divisions between the Iranian regime and its young people, civil society, and female population, however, he argued that threats of UNSC sanctions were an effective form of pressure on the regime. According to Chapon, Chirac stressed that the GoF would be firm and make no concessions to Iran on the nuclear issue, and was working to maintain the best possible coordination on the issue with Washington and Moscow. Chirac explained that the EU-3 would seek to make a serious and credible offer to Iran in order to put the onus on the Iranian side to respond. If the Iranians failed to meet their obligations, Chirac stressed that the GoF was ready to take the issue to the UNSC. Chapon added that Sharon maintained a relatively moderate line on Iran and did not into enter details, for instance, on Israeli analysis of the progress of the Iranian nuclear program. FRANCE-ISRAEL FOUNDATION ------------------------ 7. (SBU) Chapon and Israeli embassy contacts described the proposed founding of a new France-Israel foundation as the sole concrete result from the Sharon visit. Chapon explained that the GoF-proposed foundation will be an unusual public-private partnership, with a 1:7 ratio between government and private sector financing, the latter coming mainly from the French Jewish community. The purpose of the foundation will be to improve the public image of Israel in France, and vice-versa, through high-profile public diplomacy initiatives, in contrast to the very low-key France-Israel technical commission in operation since 2003. Initial efforts will focus on student exchanges, expanded civil society contact, and organizing a France-Israel cultural week in 2006, which will mark the formal launch of the foundation and the opening of a new French cultural center in Tel Aviv. Chapon added that the bilateral public diplomacy efforts had already started before the Sharon visit, with coordinated interviews by Chirac and Sharon appearing in the French and Israeli press last week. COMMENT ------- 8. (C) The Sharon visit culminates a GoF effort launched nearly three years ago (under then-FM Villepin) to improve its long-troubled bilateral relations with Israel, and was a resounding success in overcoming the GoF's particular psychological baggage with respect to Sharon. Though Chirac and Sharon are not new best friends, their convergence on such varied issues as anti-Semitism, Syria, Iran, and cows is striking, especially for two dinosaurs of international politics. The visit offered the GoF the chance to offer Sharon a symbolic boost before Gaza disengagement begins, but was also timed, Quai contacts tell us, to avoid generating domestic controversy, with most of the French public already in vacation mode by late July. We do not see the GoF using the Sharon visit as way to seek a more high-profile role in peace efforts at the expense of the U.S., as some local media analysts have speculated. For now, the GoF appears to have recalibrated its public message on Gaza disengagement in line with that of the U.S.: focus on making disengagement a success, and highlight the roadmap as offering a political perspective to the Palestinians. End comment. STAPLETON
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04