Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05THEHAGUE1941 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05THEHAGUE1941 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy The Hague |
| Created: | 2005-07-11 14:30:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | EAID LE PREL SY TU UZ NL UN |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L THE HAGUE 001941 SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/11/2015 TAGS: EAID, LE, PREL, SY, TU, UZ, NL, UN SUBJECT: NETHERLANDS/GAERC: DUTCH EXPECTATIONS REF: STATE 124856 Classified By: Acting Political Counselor Nathaniel Dean for reasons 1. 4 (b) and (d). 1. (C) SUMMARY: Responding to reftel, the Dutch MFA was prickly in response to the suggestion there be no "package approach" to UN reform. The Dutch thought Syria was improving its behavior in Lebanon in response to international pressure and suggested they are doing their best under the circumstances. The Dutch agreed generally with USG positions on Turkey, Iran and Uzbekistan. After noticing there were no points on Zimbabwe and the Middle East, the Dutch noted that the EU approach to Gaza withdrawal will be discussed at the GAERC. End Summary. UNGA OUTCOMES: WOULD THE USG VETO A PACKAGE DEAL? 2. (C) Poloff delivered reftel points to Adriaan Palm (MFA, Deputy European Correspondent) on July 7 and reaffirmed that the USG does not favor a package deal approach to UN reform at the HLE. Palm resisted, stating that failure in New York in September "would be a bad idea." He floated the notion that a reform package might be sustainable if it explicitly excluded the issue of UN Security Council reform. He asked if the USG would veto a package if one were to appear at the HLE, to which Poloff replied that the USG always negotiates in good faith. SYRIA/LEBANON: GIVE THE SYRIANS CREDIT FOR EFFORTS MADE 3. (C) Palm questioned reftel points on Syrian intelligence operatives in Lebanon, stating, "The Israelis have them and the Americans have them there," implying that the Syrians should have the right to post intelligence operatives as well. Poloff countered that Syrian agents were determined to destabilize Lebanon. Palm argued that the EU and Syria had invested resources to patrol the Syria/Iraq border and pointedly asked if the Iraqis and Americans were doing all they could on the other side. (He implied the border could be better controlled were there visa requirements for nationals' travel between Iraq and Syria.) Acknowledging that Syria had fortified its border security in response to international pressure, he warned against the West applying too much pressure in Damascus lest "the pressure cooker explode." TURKEY: TIGHT EU SCHEDULE LEAVES LITTLE TIME FOR MANEUVERING 4. (C) Quoting "pacta sunt servanda," Palm impatiently cautioned that Turkey must fulfill its own obligations taken under the December 17 deal. The British Presidency schedule had left little time to finalize the accession negotiation plans. He complained that the July GAERC could be the last formal meeting empowered to take decisions until the October 3 GAERC, which the British double-booked with the first Turkey/EU meeting. There is no September GAERC, but the informal Gymnich that month could conclude accession program plans as an "A" point to present for adoption on October 3, Palm nervously surmised. He added that, by tradition, the EU holds a GAERC in September on the margins of the New York UNGA, where the plans for Turkey could be tweaked. US/EU POLICY ON IRAN STILL TRACKING 5. (C) Palm agreed with the points on Iran. UZBEKISTAN: RATCHETING UP THE EU RESPONSE 6. (C) Palm wanted to reassure the USG that the EU will take measures to address the issue of Uzbekistan,s passed deadline on establishing a credible, transparent and independent investigation of the Andijon incident. He said that "real action is needed," and suggested the EU would take a gradual approach, starting by targeting restrictions on the leadership. The EU would discuss graduated sanctions including suspension of the Uzbek-EU agreement. At the same time, Palm asked if the USG did not want to take a tougher stance on Uzbekistan though it might conflict with our cooperation with the Uzbeks on the war in terror. DUTCH LOOKED FOR POINTS ON ZIMBABWE AND THE MIDDLE EAST 7. (C) Palm was openly surprised that there were no talking points on Zimbabwe or the Middle East. He mentioned that the EU approach to Gaza withdrawal will be discussed at the GAERC. BLAKEMAN
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04