Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05OTTAWA2076 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05OTTAWA2076 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Ottawa |
| Created: | 2005-07-08 18:49:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | ECPS Bill Graham |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS OTTAWA 002076 SIPDIS SENSITIVE E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: ECPS, Bill Graham SUBJECT: OTTAWA: DEMARCHE TO MEMBERS OF THE ITU COUNCIL ON SINGLE MEMBER STATE VETO ISSUE REF: SECSTATE 124476 1. (SBU) Econ staff responsible for the Telecom portfolio met with Industry Canada's Director of International Telecommunications Policy and Coordination Bill Graham and staffers Janis Doran and Jim Mackenzie to discuss the documents provided in reftel, which we had previously faxed to Industry Canada. Industry Canada officials seemed already well-briefed on the subject and mentioned that they have previously discussed this issue with Dick Baird, Marian Gordon and Jamie Annis. GOC's position is generally in line with U.S. position on Single State Veto, but GOC sees the problem as tactical rather than philosophical--how to best present the issue to gain the support of other ITU members? GOC plans to focus its efforts on decreasing opposition, saying specifically that any mention of national sovereignty is not helpful, as it can be seen by some members (particularly African countries) as U.S. pressure tactics or the possibility that one country could have a sovereign interest to veto other countries' proposals. 2. (SBU) Instead, GOC intends to convey to African and smaller Asian member country representatives the fact that a global consensus on IT standards is in their interest, that it would simplify progress for developing countries, that geographic fragmentation hurts everyone, and that the single member state veto is helpful in ensuring that global consensus. Ms. Doran in particular emphasized that the GOC supports global consensus, and clarified that the GOC had suggested the possibility of a two-member veto as a compromise (some countries, particularly Australia and the UK had been suggesting three- or four-member veto options). Ms. Doran explained that the two-member veto mirrors the procedural requirements of the ITU for a motion and a second of the motion. This proposal of a two-member veto compromise was intended, in her words, to "minimize damage." What the GOC hopes to get out of council is a mechanism to study and explain the advantages of the single member state veto. 3. (SBU) Mr. Graham and Ms. Doran characterized the UK and Australia as the biggest impediment, with additional opposition to the US stance from African nations (comment: Ms. Doran said that "the UK has charged up the African countries" and noted with some surprise that this seems to have become an issue for Uganda and Ghana, countries which previously did not get involved much, in her opinion. End comment.) As for Europe, she characterized smaller countries as less likely to be on board than bigger countries. Ms. Doran plans to speak with representatives from Brazil and Venezuela, hoping to find out about Spain and Portugal's influence in South America. Ms. Doran also plans to speak with the Moroccan representatives to get a sense of the stance of other Arab nations. Visit Canada's Classified Web Site at http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/wha/ottawa WILKINS
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04