Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05PARIS4750 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05PARIS4750 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Paris |
| Created: | 2005-07-07 15:38:00 |
| Classification: | SECRET |
| Tags: | PREL PGOV PTER FR |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 03 PARIS 004750 SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/06/2015 TAGS: PREL, PGOV, PTER, FR SUBJECT: COUNTER-TERRORISM CONSULTATIONS WITH THE FRENCH, PART 2 OF 2 REF: PARIS 479 Classified By: POLITICAL MINISTER-COUNSELOR JOSIAH ROSENBLATT, FOR REAS ONS 1.4 B/D 1. (S) Summary: A USG delegation led by Counselor Philip Zelikow met with senior French officials June 27 to inaugurate strategic counter-terrorism consultations. This cable reports on discussions addressing the radicalization and recruitment of extremists, and geographic areas of concern, which on the French side, included discussion of the GSPC terrorist group. Other discussions on C/T doctrine formulation and the role of public diplomacy, threat assessments and crisis management are reported septel. Both delegations hailed the talks as important steps in the furthering of excellent U.S.-French counter-terrorism cooperation. The talks adjourned with the decision to meet again in Washington in October. End summary. 2. (C) The consultations took place June 27 at the headquarters of the Secreteriat General de la Defense Nationale (SGDN), an interagency organization that reports to the Prime Minister on defense and security issues. The U.S. delegation, led by Counselor Zelikow, included David Aidekman, State; Marc Norman, State; Charles Frahm, FBI; James Roberts, DOD; Randall Blake, NCTC; Josiah Rosenblatt, Political Minister-Counselor at Embassy Paris; Thomas White, Economic Minister-Counselor at Embassy Paris; Mark Motley, Embassy Paris; and Peter Kujawinski (note taker), Embassy Paris. The French delegation was led by Francis Delon, SGDN Secretary General, and included Stanislas de Laboulaye, the SIPDIS MFA's Director General for Political and Security Affairs; Admiral Edouard Scott de Martinville, SGDN deputy Secretary General; Major General Jean-Pierre Meyer, Permanent Secretary of the SGDN's Joint Intelligence Committee; Eric Lebedel, the SGDN's director for International and Strategic Affairs; Prefect Bernard Boube, the SGDN's director for Protection, Safety and Security; Philippe Meunier, MFA DAS-equivalent for counter-terrorism and security; Jean-Francois Clair, DST (France's internal security service); and Thierry Liron, DGSE (France's external intelligence service.) THE RADICALIZATION AND RECRUITMENT OF EXTREMISTS 3. (S) Blake said the USG was focused on determining where in the process of radicalization a government might be most effective in preventing the turn towards radicalism. Potential radicals were exposed to the globalization of extremist thought, said Blake. Much training could occur at the local or virtual level and recruiting can be localized as well, although the resources for training and recruitment can be found anywhere, via the Internet. The FBI is most concerned about those driven to radicalism by ideology, said Frahm, as opposed to groups that had more traditional political grievances. He said Iraq was the center of jihadist fighting. 4. (S) Clair followed up with a review of radicalism and recruitment in France. The DST estimated that approximately 6 million Muslims lived in France, some 10 percent of the population. Islamic extremism in France is largely Sunni, which makes the presence of "self-proclaimed imams" particularly difficult, given that Sunnis do not have a formal clergy. These self-proclaimed imams are those with little or no religious training who nonetheless proclaimed themselves religious leaders and by force of personality, began to attract followers. One example of this, said Clair, was the self-proclaimed imam in the 19th arrondissement of Paris who, in the space of a few months, managed to attract a group of teenagers and convince them to go to Iraq to fight Coalition forces and commit suicide. This "imam" had never studied theology and was only 24 years old, but he was charismatic. French security forces dismantled the group days before they had planned to leave (reftel). 5. (S) To counter the message and attractiveness of these self-proclaimed imams, Clair said the GOF was working to encourage the Muslim community to organize itself with a clearly French identity. In the past, said Clair, foreign governments, including Algeria and Morocco, funded nationally-linked mosques to exert control over their populations who were permanent residents of France or dual citizens. To encourage Muslims in France to develop a French identity, the GOF has organized Muslim councils, focused on encouraging imams and prayer leaders to speak French, and encouraged local non-Muslim residents to accept mosques in order to drive all Muslim worship from the clandestine to an open environment. Delon said France's Catholic heritage had made the country historically less willing to accept the construction of mosques, and this was something the GOF was working to overcome. 6. (S) Clair said the GOF intentionally tried not to construct a profile of possible extremists, given that they wanted to cast their net as wide as possible. Still, they observed certain common characteristics of those recruited to extremism. Most were between the ages of 20 and 40, and either born in North Africa or of North African descent. Those targeted for recruitment are usually in poor, urban areas with precarious employment and often, a past of petty criminality. Another group targeted is converts who live in the same poor areas as those of North African origin, Clair said. The converts, who often have the same background of precarious employment and a criminal past, usually become the most radical. Once recruited to extremist thought, a number of impulses push them to violence, said Clair, including frustration, a search for values, the prospect of a tightly knit community, and the incentive to aid victimized people. The two major recruitment areas, said Clair, are poor neighborhoods and prisons. Clair estimated that the longer the conflict in Iraq continues, the more candidates for jihad will try to reach Iraq to fight. GEOGRAPHIC AREAS OF CONCERN 7. (S) Zelikow opened the discussion of regional issues by noting six geographic areas of particular concern to the USG regarding terrorism. They were: the Arabian peninsula (especially Saudi Arabia), Pakistan/Afghanistan, the Horn of Africa, Southeast Asia, the Sahel and certain European cities. He asked whether the French considered any particular European cities as either specific targets or places where terrorists felt more comfortable. He noted that it was probably not a coincidence that very few meetings of terrorists took place in France, while it seemed as if many meetings before 9/11 took place in Hamburg. Liron agreed that certain terrorists did seem to have a comfort level in Hamburg, although he cautioned that it was extremely difficult to speculate which cities were considered easier to circulate in or which were considered targets. As an example, he said that intelligence estimates in March 2004 analyzed that terrorists might strike Italy, and therefore, the Madrid bombings caught them by surprise. Additionally, no one believed the Netherlands would be a target, and therefore, the killing of filmmaker Theo Van Gogh also came as a surprise. Liron said France shared the USG's concern regarding the six geographic areas, and that France would add the Balkans, particularly because criminal groups (especially the mafia) and terrorists intermingled, and the Balkans borders with the EU were porous. 8. (S) Liron then launched into a presentation on the GSPC, the Algerian-based terrorist group that has targeted Algerian and French interests. After some years of decline, the GOF estimates that the GSPC now represents a well-structured and well-organized threat to French and Western interests. The GOF believes the GSPC is trying to reinvent itself, from a terrorist organization with largely political goals to an al-Qaeda-linked transnational organization fighting a global jihad. French intelligence believes the GSPC has made contact with Iraqi-based terrorist Zarqawi, and that furthermore, there was a rapprochement between GSPC and al-Qaeda in 2003. In an October 14, 2004 communique, the GSPC urged Zarqawi to target French citizens in Iraq. In addition, the GSPC has begun to use geographic terms that relate to Islamic conquest, such as calling North Africa "Berber countries," just as Zarqawi refers to Iraq as "Mesopotamia." 9. (S) The GSPC, said Liron, has shown signs of reaching outside Algeria to recruit and train sympathizers from Tunisia and Mauritania. French intelligence suspects that the Sahel branch of the GSPC has attempted to set up networks in Niger and Mali. Through its reaching out to sympathizers from other countries, its adoption of jihadist methods such as suicide bombers, and its merging of national combat with international jihad, the GSPC hopes to broaden its reach beyond Algeria and expand its terrorist capabilities. However, Liron said, the GSPC still considers France to be its hereditary enemy. 10. (S) Zelikow noted that in an ideologically-driven environment, distinctions blur and terrorist groups have more leeway to work together. Given the apparent resurgence of the GSPC, he asked how Algeria had been recently successful in fighting terrorism within its borders. Liron replied saying that the GSPC had been forced to leave Algeria's north for the more inhospitable south because of the effectiveness of Algeria's counter-terrorism capabilities. In addition, the Algerian government's reconciliation efforts had paid off and had encouraged many extremists to lay down their arms. Delon said the case of Algeria was a good example of the combination of military resolution and a policy of reconciliation. Each one, on their own, would not have worked but used in combination, they were successful. Delon also noted that terrorism had very little support among the Algerian people, given the bloodiness of previous terrorist attacks committed by the Armed Islamic Group (GIA). 11. (U) This cable was cleared by Counselor Zelikow's staff. STAPLETON
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04