Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05SANTODOMINGO3345 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05SANTODOMINGO3345 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Santo Domingo |
| Created: | 2005-06-23 20:53:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | PGOV DR Dominican Politics |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 SANTO DOMINGO 003345 SIPDIS SENSITIVE DEPT FOR WHA, WHA/CAR, INR; NSC FOR SHANNON; USCINCSO ALSO FOR POLAD;TREASURY FOR OASIA-MAUREEN WAFER; USDOC FOR 4322/ITA/MAC/WH/CARIBBEAN BASIN DIVISION; USDOC FOR 3134/ITA/USFCS/RD/WH; DHS FOR CIS-CARLOS ITURREGUI E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: PGOV, DR, Dominican Politics SUBJECT: DOMINICAN POLITICS #30: BIG PICTURE CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM 1. (SBU) This is #30 in our series of political reports on Leonel Fernandez's first year in office. BIG PICTURE CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dominican Senate President Andres Bautista convened a conference on June 15 on "Constitutional Reform" with invited experts from 8 Latin American countries. He was seeking to give momentum to an effort to examine the "big picture" of constitutional reform, stalled since 2001 when a study was delivered by a commission headed by Msgr Agripino Nunez, rector of the Catholic PUCMM university. Congress has changed the Constitution 37 times, almost always respondingto political exigencies of the moment -- as in the 1996 amendment that barred presidential succession, blocking Balaguer, and the 2002 amendment that reversed the decision, permitting Hipolito Mejia to make an ultimately unsuccessful re-election effort. Sessions to amend the constitution are voted by a simple majority of the Congress and convened 15 days later; changes to the text are enacted by Congress, by 2/3 vote of those present, with a mimimum quorum of half of the membership. The day before the ceremonial opening, during a meeting with the President and the U.S. ambassador at the presidential palace, Bautista and House of Representatives President Alfredo Pacheco had invited Fernandez to speak at the opening in the Senate chamber. The event was televised. Other speakers generally droned through their written texts -- for example, House President Pacheco summarized the 37 changes made since the Dominican constitution was established in 1844. Bautista explained the intentions of the meetings, greeted invited scholars and practitioners and thanked mediator Msgr Nunez for his commission's work. The President's Suggested Themes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - As the final orator, Fernandez reminded his audience he had been invited only the previous day - - but the scope, precision and passion of his extemporized twenty-minute speech outshone any of the other participants. Among his key comments: - - Though the Constitution provides that laws and regulations counter to the Constitution are null and void, it identifies no mechanism for deciding constitutionality or establishing the principle of precedent and general applicability. Fernandez noted that some countries have created a special court of chamber specifically charged with constitutional interpretation; some, such as France, have judicial bodies that certify the constitutionality of laws before they are promulgated. Fernandez called for debate on this theme and suggested that the Supreme Court might be specifically designated for this function. - - He noted that following Hispanic tradition, the Public Ministry (Ministry of Justice), once representative of the Crown, is part of the executive branch. Fernndez suggested discussing whether the Justice Ministry should be independent of the executive. - - Debate on the Constitution should include a re-examination of the rights and responsibilities of citizens. He suggested that the Constitution might, for example, recognize the right of a citizen to privacy and to safeguard of his reputation and provide recourse when those rights are impugned. - - &In a constitutional reform in the Dominican Republic it would be interesting to introduce the concept of an electoral consultation, a referendum, and even of a recall election, not only for the head of the executive branch but for any and all elected representatives of any jurisdiction.8 - - Fernandez suggested that congressional representatives seek to define a mechanism for institutional representation of the Dominican &diaspora.8 Reporters busily interviewed other politicians for reaction, which was featured in newspapers the following day. Some expressed misgivings about the provisions for electoral consultations or recall elections, suggesting that these might cause political instabililty. Issue: Including the Military - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The greatest stir arose from a press interview with Secretary of the Armed Forced Sigfrido Pared Perez, published the next day. In a comment incidental to the interview, Pared Perez offered his personal opinion that the Constitution should be changed to allow members of the armed forces and the police to vote. Some political figures and commentators subsequently expressed deep concern about that idea, arguing that security forces would become politicized. No one was admitting at the same time that the senior leadership of both institutions has long been adept in exploiting ties to the parties -- for example, Pared Perez himself is the brother of Reynaldo Pared Perez, Secretary General of Fernandez's PLD. Fernandez, an enthusiast for the big picture in any form, demonstrated his eloquence, patriotic concern and mastery of the subject matter, further anchoring his authority as head of state. Bautista and the rest of the congressional leadership have not proposed any timetable for considering specific reforms to the Constitution, and in the end, this conference may serve simply to add to the theoretical literature on constitutional law. And the political unease aroused by proposals that a U.S. observer might consider simple or benign served to remind us that a number of the deciders of Dominican democracy are not entirely at ease with the notion of offering greater electoral voice to the people. Or to the security forces, either. 2. (U) Drafted by Michael Meigs. 3. (U) This piece and others in our series can be consulted at our SIPRNET site http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/wha/santodomingo/ along with extensive other material. HERTELL
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04