Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05CAIRO4709 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05CAIRO4709 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Cairo |
| Created: | 2005-06-21 15:59:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | PGOV EG KPAO OVIP PREL Democracy Reform Media |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 CAIRO 004709 SIPDIS SENSITIVE E.O. 12958: NA TAGS: PGOV, EG, KPAO, OVIP, PREL, Democracy Reform, Media SUBJECT: SECRETARY RICE'S VISIT A SUCCESS IN EYES OF HER AUDIENCE AND EGYPTIAN MEDIA Sensitive but unclassified. Please protect accordingly. 1. (SBU) Summary: Secretary Rice's visit to Egypt on June 20 and her speech at the American University in Cairo (AUC) led all Egyptian reporting, both in print and on television. Coverage was generally positive, with most commentators applauding what they perceived as a less-aggressive tone both in the Secretary's speech and in her comments at the press conference with Foreign Minister Aboul Gheit. However, several commentators suggested Egyptians would dismiss the Secretary's push for greater democracy, since U.S. SIPDIS democratic efforts in Iraq, in their view, have failed. Members of the audience at AUC appreciated the candidness and delivery of her speech, even if they did not agree fully with the message. End summary. 2. (U) Secretary Rice's June 20 visit to Egypt led all Egyptian media reports. Pro-government newspapers led with Secretary Rice's meeting with President Mubarak, relegating her speech and her meeting with reform-minded individuals to inside pages. Opposition papers tended to highlight the Secretary's speech and her comments at the press SIPDIS conference with Foreign Minister Aboul Gheit about free and fair elections. All newspapers reported the Secretary's comments that the U.S. would not meet SIPDIS with the Muslim Brotherhood. 3. (U) All newspapers published large excerpts from the Secretary's speech, however no paper printed the entire text of the Secretary's speech. Pro- government papers tended to omit the segments of the speech that addressed progress towards greater democracy in Jordan, Lebanon, Iraq and the Palestinian territories, while opposition papers highlighted these segments. Opposition newspaper Al Wafd (circulation: 70,000) carried a front-page headline that quoted Secretary Rice as lauding the Wafd Party for its contribution to Egyptian democracy. Only independent Al Masry Al Youm (circulation: 20,000) reported on a small protest in Cairo on June 20 that called for an end to the Mubarak presidency and suggested Secretary Rice take a stronger stand on democracy in Egypt. (Note: The protesters apparently chanted in English "Give him a visa, Condoleezza," suggesting the Secretary take Mubarak back to the U.S. End Note.) 4. (U) Newspaper columnists in the pro-government press uniformly suggested Secretary Rice had adopted a new, more conciliatory tone during her visit to Egypt. A columnist in pro-government Al Ahram (circulation: 800,000) theorized that Secretary Rice's lack of "threats" may have been due to frustrations in U.S. policy in Iraq and the harm the violence there is doing to U.S. democracy efforts in the region. The editor-in-chief of pro-government Al Akhbar (circulation: 750,000) praised the Secretary's comments during the joint press conference as "balanced, diplomatic, and unprovocative." Al Goumhuriya (pro-government, circulation: 500,000) editor-in-chief claimed that Secretary Rice had fostered a new atmosphere between Egypt and the U.S. by "giving up on her arrogance and provocative statements." He praised Secretary Rice for highlighting Egypt's important role in the region and for stating that the U.S. would not meet with the Muslim Brotherhood. Opposition columnists generally did not address the visit in the June 21 editions. 5. (U) All television talk shows discussed the Secretary's visit, while her interview with Nile TV SIPDIS ran repeatedly in English and, again, with Arabic subtitles. Orbit TV's "Al Qahira Al Youm" hosted a member of the ruling National Democratic Party's Secretariat, who described U.S.-Egyptian relations as SIPDIS "healthy" and said that Egyptians like America, as demonstrated by their propensity to send their children to university there. The program host, who had attended the Secretary's speech, praised her "new, soft tone," while Al Ghad party chairman Ayman Nour and Al Wafd party member Mounir Abdel Nour commented by phone on the Secretary's meeting with reformers, emphasizing that they were invited to attend as individuals and not as representatives of their parties. Some guests on Channel One's "Malaf Khas" and Nile TV's "Monday" programs suggested that failures in the U.S.-designed democracy in Iraq are hurting U.S. efforts to promote democracy in the rest of the region. Meanwhile, a political analyst on Nile News praised the Secretary's comments on Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and her agreement that democracy cannot be imposed on a society. Guests on several of these programs rejected U.S. election observers during upcoming Egyptian elections. 6. (SBU) In informal comments to PA staff, Mohamed Abdul Hadi of Al Ahram newspaper commented that her delivery was not as harsh as many Egyptians might have expected a belief confirmed by the many commentators who remarked on the Secretary's "softer" tone. He said it left people with the impression that the Secretary was not trying to impose a U.S. ultimatum on Egypt. Many other journalists appreciated her acknowledgement of America's own rocky road towards full and free elections. Amr Adeeb, host of the popular Orbit TV daily talk show "Al Qahira Al Youm," pointed out that the applause after her speech at AUC was much greater than that which greeted her arrival. 7. (SBU) Likewise, audience members interviewed by Embassy officers after the Secretary's speech at AUC generally agreed that the speech was balanced and well-delivered. Comments included: -- "Excellent speech, liked it very much and the candor with which it was delivered. I also liked her answer to the issue of the desecration of the Quran." (Aly El Samman, Secretary General of the Al Azhar-led Interfaith Dialogue Committee) -- "Overall a good speech and nothing out of what was expected. She touched on all the points that we were expecting her to touch on." (Dr. Mohamed Kamal, NDP member, Shura Council) -- "Secretary Rice's speech was excellent, but I was hoping she would more directly address why the USG would not communicate or work with the Muslim Brotherhood (MB)....If the MB legitimately gained power here in Egypt, would the U.S. support it? If not, why not?" (unidentified attendee) -- "I loved the speech. This is what we as a civil society are looking for. The GOE will have to comply knowing that the message is out there that it was delivered in Egypt and with Egyptians hearing it first hand. I have no doubt in my mind now that the GOE will have to allow international observers, or at the very least will not stop them when they come." (Nasser Amin, Arab Center for the Independence ce of the Judiciary and Legal Profession) -- "I thoroughly enjoyed the speech and the question- answer session. My only criticism is that I feel Secretary Rice should have been a bit tougher on SIPDIS pushing for democratic reform here in Egypt and that she should have more strongly emphasized that Egypt cannot be the exception to reform." (Moheb Zaki, Senior Advisor, Ibn Khaldun Center) 8. (SBU) Comment. There is no question that the Secretary had a positive impact on those who attended SIPDIS the speech. It should be noted that the audience was heavily weighted with Embassy contacts, academics, and others likely to listen with an open mind. Attacks and criticism from the reactionary yellow press and defensive nationalists are inevitable once they have had time to digest the speech and devise their responses. End Comment. GRAY
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04