Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05KINGSTON1532 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05KINGSTON1532 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Kingston |
| Created: | 2005-06-17 19:10:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | ECON EAGR ETRD JM ENG |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 KINGSTON 001532 SIPDIS STATE FOR WHA/CAR (WBENT) E.O. 12958: NA TAGS: ECON, EAGR, ETRD, JM, ENG SUBJECT: PATTERSON SEEKS SUGAR RELIEF FROM TONY BLAIR REF: A) KINGSTON 1042 B) KINGSTON 1444 1. Summary: On June 10, Prime Minister P.J. Patterson wrote to British Prime Minister Tony Blair seeking support for relief from the European Commission's (EC) planned 39 percent cut in the price guaranteed to Caribbean sugar producers. In his letter, Patterson complained that the cut is unrealistic, and will cause the sugar industry to collapse. The letter comes in advance of the June 22 meeting of the EC to set the rate cuts into law, and against the backdrop of a Jamaican sugar industry having its worst production levels in 60 years. The GOJ hopes to secure more time in which to shift from reliance on raw sugar export to the production of higher-value ethanol for use as a fuel additive. End Summary. 2. On June 10, Prime Minister P.J. Patterson wrote to British Prime Minister Tony Blair seeking support for relief from the European Commission's 39 percent cut in the price guaranteed to Caribbean sugar producers over the course of three years (ref A). 3. In the letter, Patterson protested that the planned rate cut is "unrealistic", and will cause the Jamaican industry to collapse before it has a chance to adapt, placing into crisis 250,000 people that, according to Patterson, depend on the industry. He also complained that the EU had not adequately consulted with the GOJ before moving ahead with the removal of price supports. Patterson admitted that the sugar industry cannot survive in its present model, and stated that Jamaican sugar producers were working to identify alternative uses for cane. To allow an "adequate, properly funded preparatory period," Patterson informed Blair that he expected him to fight for a "reasonable transition period". 4. On June 15, Econoff contacted Clara Quantrill, Second Secretary at the British High Commission (BHC) about HMG's SIPDIS reaction to Patterson's letter. The BHC had not received a copy of the letter, said Quantrill, and had not received any indication of PM Blair's planned response. However, upon hearing the letter's contents, Quantrill said that it was the same message the GOJ had been sending for the past three years. She added that the HMG's position is that the sugar quota and price guarantees are an internal European Commission matter and that, while the U.K. has long enjoyed a close relationship with the Caribbean and would continue to look out for their interests, HMG would abide by the final decision reached by the Commission. 5. On June 15, Econoff met with Karl James, General Manager of Jamaica Cane Products Sales Limited. James noted that Patterson had been deeply involved in the sugar trade since playing a role in the negotiation of the current protocol in 1975, and has known for a decade that the current arrangement was scheduled for a revision. Patterson's primary complaint, according to James, was that the GOJ only learned the details second hand, following vague promises by European trade partners in April 2004 that any adjustment in price guarantees would be phased in over 10 to 15 years. In July 2004, the GOH learned through public documents that the details of the proposed change had been set at a 37 percent price cut over three years, beginning in 2005. In response to GOJ protests, James said, European negotiators agreed in principle to a start date of July 2006, and that the size of the cuts was just a proposal. 6. According to James, Patterson's letter of protest to Blair was triggered by a new piece of information, reported in media, that the size of the proposed cuts had been increased to 39 percent, and that the new plan would be codified in formal legislation on June 22. James stated that Patterson believes that the recent rejection of the EU constitution by French and Dutch voters shows that the people of Europe are not happy with the bureaucrats in the EU parliament, and hopes that, through bilateral diplomacy, Jamaica's guaranteed sugar price and purchasing arrangements with individual EU member-state governments might be preserved. 7. According to James, the GOJ acknowledges that the current structure of the Jamaican sugar industry is unworkable, and must evolve or die. He added that, at the present time, the GOJ is seeking a delay in the inception of the planned EU price-guarantee reduction. The reason for the delay, James said, would be to allow Jamaica's sugar industry to transition into a new business model of using sugar cane primarily as an energy source - burning the cane husks to power electrical generators and converting the molasses into ethanol. 8. James stated that the GOJ is very interested in developing a large ethanol industry on the island with Brazilian assistance. A pilot ethanol refinery at the main Petrojam facility, built with Brazilian investment, is scheduled to begin conversion of Brazilian feedstock (molasses) in late June. James said that several more plants are planned, with the long-term goal of supplying both the U.S. market and the Jamaican domestic market. 9. According to James, the Ministry of Commerce Science and Technology (with Energy) (MCSTE) is drafting new regulations that will require gasoline sold in Jamaica to be 10 percent ethanol by weight, replacing the toxic fuel additive in current use, methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE), which has been banned and replaced with ethanol in many parts of the United States. James estimated that, just to meet the Jamaican domestic demand for ethanol once the new legislation goes into effect, over 700,000 tons of sugar would be needed. In the 2004-2005 harvest (the worst since the labor unrest of 1938), only 128,000 tons of sugar were produced, leading to unfilled export quotas and even short supplies on domestic supermarket shelves. James argued that, in order for the conversion to ethanol to succeed, the GOJ would have to take immediate action to increase the amount of cane producing land to meet expected demand. 10. On June 16, Econoff spoke with Andre Johnston, a Petroleum Safety Inspector at the MCSTE's Petroleum Safety Inspectorate. Johnston clarified that the idea of replacing MTBE with ethanol has been approved by Cabinet, following a formal submission of the proposal in 2004. The MCSTE is currently forming an interagency group, including representatives of the GOJ and the petroleum industry, to work out the basics of timelines and policies. Johnston said that not enough research has been done to verify James' estimate that 700,000 tons of sugar would be needed to meet domestic demand, but that the GOJ did plan to eventually switch over to sourcing their ethanol feedstock from domestic suppliers. 11. Comment: Patterson's figure of 250,000 people dependent on the sugar industry conflicts with industry estimates of roughly 25,000 people directly dependent on sugar. James and P/E Chief briefly discussed the Patterson letter at a reception on June 14, and James said that Patterson was using a Caribbean-wide figure here, rather than a Jamaica-specific one. The Prime Minister's protestations of "lack of consultation" may be viewed in light of similar recent public complaints about the recently released Trafficking In Persons report (ref B), for which senior GOJ officials feigned ignorance of the extensive prior USG consultations with the GOJ on that issue. 12. Comment (cont'd): James' projections for the future of the sugar industry seem decidedly optimistic, especially if he is counting on the GOJ to increase production to 700,000 tons per year, while quotas currently go unfilled and store shelves in Jamaica are empty of sugar. Given the slow pace of agricultural reform evidenced by the GOJ in the past, it seems highly unlikely that a full-fledged domestic ethanol industry can appear before the planned price-guarantee reduction is completed. End Comment. TIGHE
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04