Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05DOHA1096 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05DOHA1096 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Doha |
| Created: | 2005-06-16 11:22:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | PTER PGOV PREL UK QA |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS DOHA 001096 SIPDIS FOR NEA/ARPI THORNE LONDON FOR PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: PTER, PGOV, PREL, UK, QA SUBJECT: QATAR REFUTES AL-QAIDA PAYOFF ALLEGATION 1. Post received the note verbale in paragraph two from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs by fax on June 8. The message refutes the allegation made in a Sunday Times article May 1 that Qatar pays al-Qaida to spare it from attack. The note requests that the Qatari position be transmitted to the "highest concerned authorities" in the USG. 2. Unofficial translation of Note Verbale: May 2005 On 5/1/2005 the Sunday Times has published an article by the Israeli writer Uzi Mahanimi under the title "Qatar pays off Al- Qaida attacks with oil money," in which he purports that the government of Qatar pays millions of pounds, every year, to Al- Qaida to avert other terrorist attacks. 1. The purport of this article is serious and undermines Qatar's reputation. This story is baseless and we challenge the writer to provide material evidence for his allegations, if he ever had such evidence. 2. The writer pretends that he depends on "official sources" and a "top-level official source." It is regrettable that the Sunday Times did not probe this allegation with the official Qatari authorities although it is a newspaper of high professional reputation. 3. Qatar's record in the field of counter-terrorism and its condemnation of terrorism is known to your friendly government. It is also known that Qatar has been a victim of serious terrorist attacks. You also know Qatar's full and clear international commitment towards combating terrorism. If this is not the case, your government, the international institutions and the main powers combating terrorism would not have kept silent. 4. It seems unbelievable that the writer of the article tries to back his prejudiced allegations by reference to Qatar's light security measures in comparison to other Gulf States. In fact, this is the reality of Qatar and that should be to the credit of Qatar and not the contrary. Is it not ridiculous to criticize such a situation? This fact alone is evidence that the allegation stated in the article is just used to insult Qatar and nothing else. 5. It seems that the writer of the article does not believe that the world had changed, otherwise he would not have referred to what has been done by some states in the 1970s and 1980s in a barren effort to cast credibility on his story. The State of Qatar cannot be measured against the countries he mentioned because its peaceful policy and commitment to international law is obvious and known. 6. The government of Qatar does not clearly know the motives behind the writing and publication of this article. But, we categorically believe that the motives are political and are targeted to offend Qatar by virtue of its open polices that do not serve the inclinations of some states in the region and elsewhere. 7. The government of my country requests the conveyance of our stand to the highest concerned authorities in your friendly government, which my government hopes that it will understand it in the light of its precise knowledge of our polices and practices. [end of text.] UNTERMEYER
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04