Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05YEREVAN1044 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05YEREVAN1044 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Yerevan |
| Created: | 2005-06-16 08:57:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | ECON EFIN EAID AM |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 YEREVAN 001044 SIPDIS SENSITIVE E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: ECON, EFIN, EAID, AM SUBJECT: REMITTANCES DRIVE UP ARMENIAN CURRENCY, HAMPER EXPORTS SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED. PLEASE PROTECT ACCORDINGLY. ------- SUMMARY ------- 1. (SBU) A recent upward trend in remittances and capital inflows into Armenia has led to significant real appreciation of the national currency, the Armenian dram, since July 2003. These cash inflows enable Armenians to finance higher consumption and investment, but the nominal appreciation of the currency and the inflationary pressure on prices is challenging Armenia's macroeconomic environment. While importers and traders in basic consumer commodities gain from the dram's appreciation, Armenia's weak export industry and the many Armenians who have their incomes fixed in foreign currency stand to lose. The Central Bank told us that they expect the dram to appreciate further over the next few years as remittances and cash inflows continue to grow. End Summary. ----------------------------------------- REMITTANCES FROM ABROAD CONTINUE TO CLIMB ----------------------------------------- 2. (SBU) According to the Central Bank of Armenia (CBA), bank transfers to private individuals in Armenia amounted to USD 740 million (21 percent of GDP) in 2004, up from USD 600 million in 2003. Private individuals transferred USD 470 million out of Armenia, making the net private transfer to Armenia USD 270 million, or 8 percent of GDP. Although the CBA does not characterize the transfers to and from individuals, Citibank (which manages international transfers for six correspondent banks in Armenia) told us they believe most transfers to Armenia are worker's remittances and most transfers out of Armenia are consumer spending. Central Bank board member Vache Gabrielyan told us that the bank did not try to estimate the amount of transfers that came by unreported means, such as people carrying cash into the country. A recent study based on household surveys estimated that remittances to Armenia could be as high as USD 1 billion per year, finding that 18 percent of Armenian households receive, on average, USD 200 per month from abroad. ---------------------------------------- INFLUX OF CASH DRIVING UP EXCHANGE RATES ---------------------------------------- 3. (SBU) Since 2003 when both foreign direct investment and private bank transfers began to climb, the dram has appreciated by 28.8 percent on the dollar (14.4 percent on the euro). Gabrielyan told us that the CBA expects the dram to appreciate more over the next few years, as remittances and capital inflows continue to increase. He added that the CBA's policy is to intervene on currency markets only to smooth out volatility, not to change trends, and even then only in cases where inflation is under control. ----------------------- WHILE IMPORTERS GAIN... ----------------------- 4. (SBU) Importers and enterprises that use imported raw materials benefit most from a stronger dram. Although importers pay less in dram terms for basic goods like petroleum, cigarettes, flour, sugar, coffee, and construction materials, consumers are paying the same price in the Armenian market. This is largely because a few traders control large market shares of imported goods, and informal barriers to entry keep would-be competitors out. Gabrielyan refuted the argument (we believe, disingenuously) that a stronger dram should bring lower prices on imports, adding that remittances raise consumers' disposable income, increasing demand for imported goods. That foreign transfers ultimately finance Armenia's consumption of imports is apparent in Armenia's national income accounts: Armenia's trade deficit (-15.2 percent of GDP) is financed by transfers and concessionary loans, allowing total consumption to nearly equal GDP at 95 percent. In other words, Armenia is spending its foreign transfers on consumption of foreign goods, rather than investing it in domestic growth. --------------------- ...EXPORTERS STRUGGLE --------------------- 5. (SBU) Although the National Statistical Service reports that exports grew by 30.8 percent for January-April 2005 against January-April 2004, a closer look shows that a nominal increase in exports of precious and non-precious metals (due to rising prices for copper and molybdenum) are behind the growth. Excluding Armenia's niche market for diamond polishing and the mining sector, exports of other products have decreased. Businesses are starting to notice: the Armenian Chamber of Commerce and Industry unsuccessfully petitioned the CBA to support the dollar against the dram in order to help Armenian producers and exporters. Foreign- backed exporters (who typically kept their costs in dollars), have had to compromise with employees, often adjusting wages upwards. Chairman of the Central Bank of Armenia, Tigran Sargsyan, was unsympathetic saying, "exporters should try to improve the quality of their goods instead of seeking 'greenhouse conditions' from the Armenian authorities." Nevertheless, Armenia's weak export industry is worse off now than it was before. --------------------------------------------- -------- COMMENT: IS CASH FROM ABROAD ARMENIA'S DUTCH DESEASE? --------------------------------------------- -------- 6. (SBU) Remittances, foreign aid, and foreign direct investment lead to an appreciation of the dram, and therefore reduced competitiveness in foreign markets for Armenia's developing industries. The large cash inflows may also exert some pressure on prices, since many goods do not enjoy a competitive market environment in Armenia. While the capital inflows raise the disposable income of Armenians, most of this income is going to consumption of imports rather to investment in domestic industry. If the trend continues as the CBA suggests it will, remittances and cash inflows from abroad (as well as much of Armenia's foreign investment, which often has as much a humanitarian as profit motivation) may do as much harm as good to Armenia's economic development and long-term sustainability. EVANS
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04