Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05OTTAWA1819 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05OTTAWA1819 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Ottawa |
| Created: | 2005-06-15 20:20:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | SENV PBTS CA Devils Lake Environment |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 OTTAWA 001819 SIPDIS STATE FOR OES (TURNER), WHA/CAN (BREESE, NELSON) WHITE HOUSE FOR CEQ E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: SENV, PBTS CA, Devils Lake, Environment SUBJECT: DEVILS LAKE, ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE WEIGHS IN 1. Summary: In a press conference on June 14 the House of Commons Environment Committee called on the federal government to act decisively and exhaust "all diplomatic and/or legal options" to stop the Devils Lake outlet from commencing operation until it has been reviewed by the IJC. The Committee's unanimous support for the resolution was overshadowed by the incendiary rhetoric of a Manitoba M.P. (not from the Committee) who called on Canada to impose trade sanction to achieve that objective. The statements of Environment Committee members and the Committee Resolution were, in contrast, forceful but measured. End summary. 2. The House of Commons Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development held a press conference the afternoon of Tuesday, June 14 to announce they had adopted a resolution calling for the United States to join Canada in a joint reference to the International Joint Commission (IJC) on Devils Lake. They also announced they will soon be sending a letter to Secretary Rice reiterating that demand and also forcefully requesting that the President become engaged on this issue and make a decision. 3. Support for the resolution was unanimous, a rarity in Parliament these days, although there were differences evident in the four parties' positions as they made their statements. 4. Perhaps most significant, however, was what occurred just as the Committee members concluded the press conference. Manitoba NDP Member of Parliament, Pat Martin (who is not a member of the Committee) took the podium and provided the press with some incendiary rhetoric. Martin, with much passion, told the assembled reporters that: "Diplomacy has not worked" and "Canada's bargaining stance has been on its knees" and "the time for a diplomatic solution is over". The NDP Member of Parliament elaborated, saying "It's time to take the gloves off and get tough with the United States", "lets start talking about trade sanctions" and, alluding to the energy relationship between Canada and the United States, he added "Let the bastards freeze in the dark". 5. The statements of Environment Committee members and the Committee Resolution were, in contrast, forceful but measured. Of course Martin's "freezing" line made the headlines in today's papers, overshadowing the all-party consensus that fellow NDP M.P. Nathan Cullen, who authored the resolution, had so carefully crafted. Indeed, we understand that Cullen, was so incensed at Martin's intemperate remarks that he and Martin who typically sit alongside one another in the House of Commons had to be relocated away from one another during last nights series of budget votes. Supposedly Martin received the cold shoulder from the rest of the NDP caucus as well. 6. The resolution is brief, the key statement is that ".whereas the said water diversion may have serious and harmful ecological and economic repercussions in Canada; Be it resolved that the Standing Committee on the Environment & Sustainable Development urgently calls upon the Government of Canada to immediately exhaust any and all diplomatic and/or legal options available to prevent any water diversion from Devils Lake, North Dakota until the project has been reviewed by the International Joint Commission." 7. The Committee's resolution is available at: http://www.parl.gc.ca/committee/CommitteePubl ication.aspx?S ourceId=120911 8. During the Q&A session the Liberal members of the Committee, Chairman Alan Tonks and Bryon Wilfert, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Environment (who represents the Minister and the government on this committee), emphasized that the current situation is untenable and expressed concern what precedent the Devils Lake issue will set if a reference to the IJC is not made. Tonks and Wilfert also stressed that negotiations are on- going between the two governments, but they noted it is critical to get the President fully engaged on this matter. Tonks and Wilfert alluded several times to also being open to alternatives to an IJC reference, as long as that process would achieve the same ends as an IJC reference, i.e. science-based consideration of the facts and an impartial recommendation. (Comment: Wilfert would definitely have been briefed on the CEQ meeting of June 13). 9. When the assembled press asked a question about linking the Devils Lake issue with trade to gain leverage, David McGuinty, a Liberal MP and brother of Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty noted that perhaps it is necessary to reexamine the Canadian relationship with the United States, and Canadian sovereignty more generally, in the context of continental environmental stewardship. McGuinty, a former Chair of Canada's National Economic and Environmental think- tank the National Roundtable on the Environment and the Economy (NRTEE), added that former Canadian Ambassador to the USA, Raymond Chrtien claimed he spent about 40% of his time on bilateral environmental issues, underscoring that perhaps these issues need a higher profile generally in the relationship. 10. In response to being pressed on alternatives to an IJC reference, Tonks mentioned that there are avenues such as a reference to the International Court of Justice, but he stressed that this was not being contemplated and that linkage to other issues (whether environmental or trade related) was premature. He also mentioned the possibility of a unilateral reference to the IJC, but exclaimed that this is not a favored option. 11. The Conservative Party's Critic for the Environment, Bob Mills, expressed support for an IJC reference as the most expeditious means to achieve a solution that all parties could live with. But he took the Liberal government to task for refusing the 2002 USG suggestion of an IJC reference at that time and Mills referenced the June 10 letter from the ND Congressional delegation to President Bush; Liberal M.P. Wilfert suggested, however, that there were several factual inaccuracies in that letter. Mills added that the Boundary Waters Treaty is over 90 years old and suggested that it needs to be modernized (a sentiment similar to that expressed by Liberal David McGuinty). 12. Nathan Cullen, NDP Environment critic and author of the Committee resolution, said that the GoC must ramp up the pressure on the United States on all available fronts, and the full range of diplomatic tools must be used - he chose not to elaborate. He claimed that if the Administration allows the DL outlet to operate it will do serious damage to the bilateral relationship 13. Finally, Bernard Bigras, Bloc Quebecois Environment critic, explained that his party fears that a dangerous precedent will be set if the Devils Lake matter is not referred to the IJC - including an erosion of the utility and effectiveness to the two governments of the IJC in the future. Dickson
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04