Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05ALMATY2231 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05ALMATY2231 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | US Office Almaty |
| Created: | 2005-06-15 12:32:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | KNNP KZ MNUC PARM PREL WMD |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L ALMATY 002231 SIPDIS DEPT FOR EUR/CACEN (J. MUDGE), NP/MNA (D. RUST) E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/15/2015 TAGS: KNNP, KZ, MNUC, PARM, PREL, WMD/Non-proliferation, POLITICAL SUBJECT: KAZAKHSTAN: CANWFZ TREATY REF: STATE 109258 Classified By: Ambassador John Ordway, reasons 1.4 (B) and (D). 1 . (C) U.S., UK and French Ambassadors called on FM Tokayev June 14 in Almaty to present reftel demarche. UK Ambassador James Sharp spoke for the group. He introduced the discussion by reiterating the support of the P-3 in principle for nuclear weapon free zones, and our belief that establishment of such a zone in Central Asia would support our common non-proliferation goals. He then read the agreed points and provided them as an aide-memoire. 2. (C) Tokayev, who was joined by Kazakhstani Ambassador to the UN Yerzhan Kazykhanov, said that Kazakhstan's position was that the CANWFZ agreement should be signed at the level of foreign ministers, and only in October. Uzbekistan was insisting that it be signed at the presidential level, and in Astana July 5 during the Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit. Ambassador Sharp noted in particular our objection to Article 12 of the Treaty, which he understood was designed to accommodate the Tashkent Treaty. Ambassadors Sharp and Ordway pointed out that this provision would undermine the very purposes of the Treaty. Sharp emphasized that without P-5 support the Treaty would have little if any meaning, and would not be regarded as a serious document. Tokayev did not disagree, but said that Kazakhstan's Central Asian partners nonetheless were insisting on going forward with the Treaty as currently drafted. 3. (C) Ambassador Sharp asked if Kazakhstan would commit to consultations with the P-3. Tokayev said that Kazakhstan was prepared to commit to the P-3 to engage in consultations during this period before October, and to take the P-3's objections "seriously." ORDWAY NNNN
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04