Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05BANGKOK3852 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05BANGKOK3852 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Bangkok |
| Created: | 2005-06-10 09:53:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | PGOV TH |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 BANGKOK 003852 SIPDIS SENSITIVE E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: PGOV, TH SUBJECT: THAILAND: RTG SUBMITS CORRUPTION COMMISSION SELECTION AMENDMENT TO PARLIAMENT; TRT FACTION LEADER SANOH AIRS HIS GRIEVANCES REF: BANGKOK 3635 1. (SBU) Summary: The Government's draft constitutional amendment to revise the selection process for the National Counter Corruption Commission (NCCC) easily passed its first reading in Parliament on June 8. The opposition Democrat Party (DP) proposed a different version of constitutional amendment bill governing the selection committees of the Election Commission and the Constitutional Court in addition to the NCCC. The government's proposal will be examined by a 45-member Senate committee before being returned for a second reading on June 15. The session was highlighted by an emotional speech by powerful but disgruntled ruling Thai Rak Thai (TRT) party faction leader Sanoh Thienthong, who characterized being under Prime Minister Thaksin's control in TRT as akin to being "enslaved." Sanoh's outburst -- though in itself unlikely to immediately seriously fracture the TRT -- does publicly put paid to the party's until now seemingly immutable discipline. Sanoh's bold dissent could signal further trouble ahead for Thaksin. End Summary. GOVERNMENT AMENDMENT PROPOSAL EASILY CLEARS FIRST READING 2. (U) The Government's draft constitutional amendment to revise the selection process for members of the National Counter Corruption Commission (NCCC) passed its first reading in Parliament (aka National Assembly) on June 8. The joint session of the National Assembly in its first reading voted 509 to 134 (with 13 abstentions) in favor of a government-proposed constitutional amendment and agreed to set up a 45-member committee to scrutinize the draft for three days (June 9-10, and June 13) before a second reading on June 15. The government ,s constitutional amendment draft -- presented to the National Assembly by PM Thaksin himself -- was confined only to the proposed change in the composition of the selection committee of the National Counter Corruption Commission (NCCC), as specified in Article 297 of the Constitution. Under the proposed new structure, the panel will consist of 15 committee members, dropping the stipulation for representation from 5 political parties (there are only 4 parties in Parliament - the sticking point that made this amendment necessary). The proposal is for the Chairpersons of the Election Commission, the State Audit Commission, and the National Human Rights Commission, as well as the Ombudsman, the Opposition Party Leader, the House Majority Leader, and representatives from the courts and universities to be on the panel. OPPOSITION PROPOSES ITS OWN AMENDMENT 3. (U) The same day, the opposition Democrat Party (DP) proposed a different version of a constitutional amendment bill with greater scope. The DP wants new rules to govern the selection committees of three key independent organizations, namely the NCCC (Article 297), the Election Commission (Article 138), and the Constitutional Court (Article 257). The Opposition's amendment version calls for the removal of any representatives of political parties from the selection committee for these three independent "watchdog" bodies. It proposes, however, the addition inclusion of 5 members from the National Economic and Social Advisory Council (NESAC) and 2 members from the National Human Rights Commission on the selection panel. (Note: see reftel for complete breakdown of the government and opposition selection committee proposals. End Note.) FACTION LEADER SANOH BURNING HIS BRIDGES? 4. (U) TRT faction leader and nominally Chief Advisor Sanoh Thienthong capitalized on the parliamentary debate to vent his frustrations and harshly criticize his own party and the rules imposed on members of Parliament (MP) by the 1997 Constitution. That document requires a minimum 90-day membership in a specific political party in order to be eligible for candidacy in an election (Article 107). (Note: Because the Constitution allows the Prime Minister to dissolve Parliament and hold elections earlier -- 60 days per article 116 -- than the 90 days required for MPs to be in a party before running, MPs are effectively held in check from switching parties. End Note.) Sanoh also slammed the constitutionally-mandated limitation of one six-year term for Senators. In his emotional outburst, Sanoh declared that the 90-day requirement had put MPs in a position no better than "slaves or prisoners." Referring to his estrangement from TRT Party PM Thaksin, Sanoh challenged the TRT executive committee to oust him. 5. (SBU) Comment: The government's amendment proposal is virtually certain to pass given Thaksin and the TRT Party's powerful majority in Parliament. Less certain is the longer term fallout from Sanoh's defiant speech. If Sanoh walks, or is kicked out, it is unlikely that his complete faction of TRT MPs will initially follow him willingly -- probably only his son, nephew, niece and a few other die-hard loyalists. However, Sanoh has already talked of "longing to return to the embrace of his big brother Banharn Silpa-archa (Leader of the Chart Thai party)," which could result in a strengthening of the old-style traditional Thai politicians. The immediate significance is that Sanoh's action sharply and publicly brings to the surface a long-fermenting tension between Thaksin and his former ally, which changes the tone of Thai public political debate, just when Thaksin seems to be more beleaguered and even weaker than at any time since 2001. Sanoh has been chafing under what he considers shabby treatment of him and his faction by Thaksin at the onset of the Prime Minister's second term. Long restrained under the Constitution rules from threatening a walkout without jeopardizing his political career, Sanoh finally vented his frustration over the 90-day party rule, giving very public voice to opinions shared more quietly by many other MPs who seethe at Thaksin's skillful use of the Constitution to cut down their ability to bargain for political advantage. This Sanoh dissent has publicly put paid to the TRT's facade of immutable discipline and could, in the longer term, provoke further disaffection and strains within Thaksin's party. BOYCE
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04