Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05BRUSSELS2202 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05BRUSSELS2202 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Brussels |
| Created: | 2005-06-08 16:01:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PREL PHUM ETRD XB EUN USEU BRUSSELS |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 BRUSSELS 002202 SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/21/2015 TAGS: PREL, PHUM, ETRD, XB, EUN, USEU BRUSSELS SUBJECT: MAY 22 COASI WORKING DINNER ON SOUTHEAST ASIA Classified By: USEU Pol M/C Kyle Scott for reasons 1.4 (b) & (d) 1. (C) Summary: On May 22, EAP A/S Chris Hill participated in a COASI working dinner on Southeast Asia with EU representatives from the Luxembourg European Presidency, the European Commission, the European Council, and the incoming UK EU Presidency. The participants discussed North Korea, in addition to agenda items on Indonesia, the Philippines, Burma and the EAS. On North Korea, Ambassador Lorenz and others asked what the EU could do to help, and A/S Hill said that they could continue to bring up human rights concerns with the North Koreans. On Indonesia, the EU is becoming increasingly engaged on Aceh and is considering contributing a monitoring mission, but no decision has been made yet. On Burma, the EU is changing its emphasis somewhat toward a policy of engagement, stating that sanctions have become irrelevant, given China and India's support for the regime. Regarding the EAS, the EU recently asked for observership in the organization, which ASEAN foreign ministers will discuss when they meet at the end of July. End Summary. 2. (C) On May 22, EAP A/S Chris Hill participated in a COASI working dinner on Southeast Asia with EU representatives from the Luxembourg European Presidency, the European Commission, the European Council, and the incoming UK EU Presidency. The EU delegation was led by Ambassador Pierre-Louis Lorenz, Luxembourg's Ambassador for Asia and Oceania. Accompanying A/S Hill to the dinner were EAP RSP Director Patricia Scroggs, USEU Political Minister Counselor Kyle Scott, EAP Special Assistant Marc Koehler, USEU Political Officer Van Reidhead, and Embassy Luxembourg Political Officer Julie Breitfeld. The participants discussed North Korea, Indonesia, the Philippines, Burma and the EAS. NORTH KOREA: EU WANTS TO BE SUPPORTIVE 3. (C) A/S Hill began with an overview of the current status of the six-party talks, noting that June 23 will mark the one-year anniversary of no talks. In the meantime, the North Koreans have harvested further plutonium. The US is considering its next steps, but there are no good options. We believe in dialogue, but we can't talk to an empty chair. Key to this attempt will be more effort from the Chinese to use their leverage with North Korea; however the Chinese also are clearly exasperated with the North Koreans. 4. (C) Lorenz reiterated the EU's support for the talks. He wondered whether North Korea was unwilling or incapable of moving itself out of the corner and mentioned that China and Korea often ask the EU to tell the US to be more flexible. A/S Hill responded that he had been conciliatory at the ARF and wanted to know if the Chinese and Koreans were still thinking this since the recent meetings with the North Koreans in New York. Antonio Tanca from the EU Council inquired how long the current situation could go on. A/S Hill responded that it could continue for a few more weeks, but then the US will either have to pursue five-party talks or report the issue to the UN 5. (C) Richard Wright, EC Director for the US, Japan and Korea expressed the EU's desire to be supportive and asked what the EU could do to help. A/S Hill suggested the EU continue talking about human rights in North Korea so that they realize this is not just an "American" issue. Lorenz noted that the EU had pushed for a resolution in Geneva and did not abandon the Geneva process as the North Koreans had asked. Denis Keefe, Head of the Far Eastern Group, FCO, London, noted that their options were limited on other ways to raise the issue and asked whether it was worth getting a discussion in UNGA on HR. A/S Hill responded that the more human rights values are internalized, the better. INDONESIA: EU BECOMING MORE ACTIVE ON ACEH 6. (C) A/S Hill presented his "glass half-full" view of Indonesia: the US is encouraged by President Yudhoyono, who has a keen understanding of governance, capacity building, and the war on terrorism. He stressed that if we get it right in Indonesia, the world's third largest democracy and a moderate Islamic nation, then it will yield enormous dividends throughout the region. He discussed U.S. priorities and initiatives in Indonesia. A/S Hill praised the EU's support for the Center for Law Enforcement Cooperation in Jakarta and encouraged the EU to keep it up. He also emphasized that it was important for EU leaders to go to Jakarta to show their support. 7. (C) Lorenz agreed with A/S Hill on the key significance of Indonesia and highlighted that it had held a recent EU-ASEAN meeting in March, and will institute a bilateral Troika with Indonesia in the near future. The EU fully supports the Ahtisaari negotiations and has given 200,000 Euro in financing. Lorenz reported that the EU also is making progress in crisis management and that it is discussing sending a monitoring mission to Aceh, but no decision has been made yet. The EU was very far from having monitors organized but would be happy to assist on the civilian side of a 200-person team. EC Director for Asia Fokion Fotiadis underscored that a monitoring mission would be a unique opportunity for the EU to develop its cooperation with ASEAN; however, he acknowledged that it is competing for resources with other EU missions. The EU emphasized that it is important not to give the impression that it would be a peacekeeping mission, but rather strictly for monitoring purposes. Fotiadis also mentioned that Jakarta's message was less optimistic and acknowledged that bringing in foreign monitors would be difficult because of public opinion. 8. (C) Fotiadis recognized the US's strong commitment to Indonesia through assistance funds, and highlighted the importance the EU places on channeling assistance through the World Bank Multi-Donor Trust Fund (MDTF). Fotiadis mentioned that he raised this issue with A/S Tony Wayne and wanted to encourage the US get on board with the MDTF, even if the US only puts a small amount in. PHILIPPINES: EU SHARES US ASSESSMENT 9. (C) A/S Hill presented his glass "half-empty" view of the Philippines, highlighting the government's serious governance and capacity building problems. Corruption has weakened courts and prison systems and Mindanao has become a real time nesting ground for terrorists throughout the region. He acknowledged the EU's programs to step up the rule of law, reform the police-judicial system, and prevent money laundering. 10. (C) Lorenz stated that the EU shares our assessment of the Philippines and the JI. EC Head of Unit for Southeast Asia Pierre Amilhat said the EU was considering supporting another regional CT center, but was waiting for ASEAN to decide where they want to set it up. BURMA: EU EMPHASIZING ENGAGEMENT WITH REGIME 11. (C) Lorenz highlighted the EU's strategy of increasing its engagement towards Burma. Lorenz underscored that the EU wanted to have a dialogue with Burma after Geneva and that an EU delegation met with Foreign Minister Nyan Win on the sidelines of the ASEM in Kyoto. The EU handed over a list of 19 political prisoners that it wanted released, including opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi, and raised the democratic process, but had not received feedback. Amilhat felt that it was politically wise to confront the regime directly rather than not talking to them. Also, by passing on a list of prisoners that the EU wants released, the EU is establishing a yardstick by which to measure the regime. 12. (C) Amilhat remarked that the EU always had a policy of "targeted sanctions" in Burma, and this targeting had been reinforced in October 2004. Amilhat expressed frustration, however, that sanctions were nearly irrelevant given China and India's support for the regime. Also, Amilhat highlighted that the problem with sanctions is that it conveys the message that "we want you out", and the EU believes that there is value in engaging the regime to deliver the message that "it is part of the problem, but also part of the solution". 13. (C) In response to a question about whether the US might pursue greater engagement, A/S Hill stated that Burma had shown no willingness to engage. He cited a recent conversation with a Burmese who had graduated from SAIS and had seemed relatively educated, who had remarked to him that Aung San Suu Kyi was a "very stubborn woman and if A/S Hill knew her he would realize why they can't just let her out on the street". A/S Hill asked how can you engage with that? 14. (C) EC Director for Asia Fokion Fotiadis asked what would happen if Burma ratifies the constitution by a 99% referendum (like his home country of Greece)? What is really the difference between this constitution and those of Vietnam or Laos? Fotiadis stressed that the real issue is human rights abuse. We should focus on that rather than the exact form of the constitution, and not get too involved in the constitution process. Lorenz further emphasized that we have to be tolerant of an imperfect democratic process. EAST ASIA SUMMIT: EU REQUEST OBSERVERSHIP 15. (C) Lorenz noted that the EAS was addressed at the ASEM in Kyoto and the Malaysia Summit in December and that the EU delivered its key message that the membership architecture needs to be inclusive and that Asia should not give the impression that it is ganging up on the US and the EU. Along these lines, the EU requested that it should be invited as an observer. The point was taken and will be discussed at the meeting of ASEAN foreign ministers at the end of July. 16. (C) A/S Hill responded that he thought the Chinese had overplayed their hand on EAS and as a result Indonesia, Singapore and Vietnam have all come out in support of keeping the US presence in SE Asia. A/S Hill mentioned that he liked ARF; he realized it wasn't perfect, but it had a pretty good membership and we wanted to see it work over ASEAN 3. We just have to be patient since we are dealing with huge disparities in countries that are much larger than they are in the OSCE. CHINA: EU WORRIED ABOUT CHINA'S MERCANTILIST TRADE POLICIES 17. (C) In a separate meeting on May 22 with the European Commission, Deputy DG for Asia Herve Jouanjean expressed concern regarding China's economic policies in Latin America, citing China buying mines in Cuba, steel factories and land in Brazil, and Columbian President Uribe's April visit to China. Jouanjean questioned whether these activities were being conducted within the proper functioning of the market economy. He noted that the Chinese protect this information very carefully and proposed that the EU and US work together to pull and exchange information on China's investments around the world. NSC Director for Asia Dennis Wilder responded that the US was also looking into China's activities in Latin America and would welcome a dialogue with the EU on this issue. (U) Cable drafted by Embassy Luxembourg Poloff Julie Breitfeld; cleared by EAP Front Office. Schnabel .
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04