Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05TAIPEI2510 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05TAIPEI2510 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | American Institute Taiwan, Taipei |
| Created: | 2005-06-08 10:16:00 |
| Classification: | SECRET |
| Tags: | PREL PGOV MARR CH TW Cross Strait Politics |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available. 081016Z Jun 05
S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 02 TAIPEI 002510 SIPDIS STATE PASS AIT/W E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/01/2015 TAGS: PREL, PGOV, MARR, CH, TW, Cross Strait Politics SUBJECT: SPECIAL DEFENSE BUDGET UNDER THREAT FROM PFP BOYCOTT Classified By: AIT Director Douglas Paal, Reason: 1.4 (B/D) 1. (C) Summary: The People First Party (PFP) is threatening to derail all Legislative Yuan (LY) deliberations, including action on the Special Defense Procurement Budget, until President Chen Shui-bian formally apologizes for accusing PFP Chairman James Soong of meeting with a PRC official in the United States. LY President Wang Jin-pyng and National Security Council (NSC) Deputy Secretary General Henry Ko separately expressed strong concern to AIT that the PFP's obstructionism could delay LY deliberations on the budget until 2006. While the PFP maintains that a Chen apology will break the logjam, officials in both the KMT and NSC believe that Soong's recent actions reflect desperation following the party's March 14 National Assembly (NA) electoral defeat. The NSC also claims to have information that Beijing had pressured Soong to stop cooperating with the Chen administration, an allegation the PFP admits has some validity. The NA's June 7 passage of legislative reforms and the July 16 KMT elections are likely to further increase pressure on PFP members to return to the KMT fold, and thus make Soong even less likely to cooperate with either the KMT or the Chen administration. Both the KMT and DPP appear to have no plan to address PFP obstructionism, other than to simply wait for the party to collapse under its own weight. End Summary. Soong Holds Special Budget Hostage ---------------------------------- 2. (C) In recent days, KMT LY President Wang Jin-pyng and NSC Deputy Secretary General Henry Ko have privately expressed deep misgivings to AIT over the potential for James Soong and his PFP to derail the Special Defense Procurement Budget in the LY. Soong has publicly stated that the PFP will boycott (effectively vetoing action) on all legislation until President Chen issues a public apology for his early May charge that Soong met secretly with PRC State Council Taiwan Affair Office (TAO) Director Chen Yunlin in the United States in January. Wang told AIT on June 4 that the PFP could effectively kill prospects for a summer special LY session to pass the Special Defense Procurement Budget package by vetoing consultations on the session's agenda (Note: while a special session can be called by a petition by one quarter of the LY membership, all four party caucuses must agree on the agenda in order for the session to operate). Wang warned that if the budget is not addressed in a summer special session, action will be difficult in the Autumn regular session due to political friction surrounding the December 3 local magistrate/mayor election campaign. 3. (C) PFP Policy Chief, and Soong lieutenant, Vincent Chang (Hsien-yao) confirmed to AIT that Soong has ordered a total boycott of all legislation pending a formal apology from the President. Chang asserted that Chen's allegations have provoked a serious outcry within the PFP and left Soong feeling personally betrayed. Chang said the PFP is prepared to derail the proposed summer special session and use its veto power over legislation to block the government's agenda in the Autumn regular session. "Chen may think Soong's anger will pass with time," Chang asserted, "he is mistaken." Chang said the longer Chen delays in responding to Soong's concerns, the more obstructionist the PFP will become. Hell Hath No Fury Like a Party Scorned -------------------------------------- 4. (C) Officials from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT say that Soong's recent actions are driven by desperation over his party's plummeting morale following the May 14 NA election fiasco. The NSC's Ko said that even if Chen patches up his personal relationship with Soong, the PFP Chairman would be unable to convince his party's independent minded LY Caucus to drop its boycott of the Special Defense Budget bill. Veteran KMT legislator Wu Ten-yi said that Soong realizes the upcoming leadership transition within the KMT and the passage of legislative reforms by the NA mean that pressure will only grow on PFP legislators to abandon the party for the KMT. The PFP's Chang told AIT that this sort of "KMT arrogance" is why the PFP, in addition to boycotting DPP legislation, is also planning to undermine the KMT by running nuisance PFP candidates in six counties and cities in the December 3 local election. Soong's Political Death Throes ------------------------------ 5. (C) DPP officials say they empathize with Soong's situation, but do not see any easy way out for him. "President Chen has treated Soong pretty poorly these past few weeks," commented DPP Secretary General Lee Ying-yang, "maybe it's time to throw a few favors his way." The NSC's Ko said the Chen administration will maintain staff-level communications with the PFP in an attempt to bring Soong around, but he was pessimistic over the possibility that Chen would offer a full public apology over his TAO accusations. Ko said that the government's hope is that the 32 member PFP Caucus will quickly collapse, leaving Soong greater flexibility to deliver the votes of the rump 11-12 PFP legislators who remain loyal to Soong. KMT Speaker Wang told AIT he will continue to try to engage Soong on the Special Defense Budget, but noted that Soong remains unwilling to talk to Wang on the subject. Wang resisted AIT's suggestion that he communicate directly with the PFP's LY Caucus leadership on the budget, asserting that he is reluctant to get involved in internal PFP politics. A PRC Angle? ------------ 6. (S) The NSC's Ko said that while the Chen administration will try to repair its relationship with Soong, the government remains concerned that Soong may have promised Beijing that the PFP will block the Special Budget. Ko claimed that during their briefing to the Chen administration following Soong's return from Beijing, PFP officials stated that in a small pull-aside meeting in Beijing, Hu asked Soong to block the Special Defense Procurement Budget in order to create conditions that would allow Beijing to announce the withdrawal of missiles from coastal regions opposite Taiwan. The PFP's Chang confirmed that Hu and Soong did have a pull-aside meeting to discuss cross-Strait and foreign policy issues, but denied that missiles or the Special Defense Budget came up in the meeting. However, Chang said that a Politburo-level PRC leader (Note: Soong reportedly met with Politburo members Zeng Qinghong and Jia Qingling) warned Soong that "we consider Chen Shui-bian a traitor to the (Chinese) nation and anyone who cooperates with Chen will be considered 'subject to attack' (douzheng de duishou)." Comment: Waiting for the End ---------------------------- 7. (C) While President Chen's overzealous NA election rhetoric has complicated the current political atmosphere, we doubt that Soong would have been able to deliver his party's LY Caucus on the budget regardless of external factors. Faced with the PFP's internal disarray and Soong's desperation, Chen administration officials are belatedly coming to the realization that it may be necessary to reach out to the KMT to get the budget through. Both Wang and advisors to KMT rival Ma Ying-jeou tell AIT that the next KMT Chairman is likely to seek a quick conclusion to the deadlock over the Special Defense Budget. However, neither KMT nor DPP officials have offered any workable solutions for breaking down a threatened PFP veto over the bill. Given the need for PFP politicians to secure a place for themselves post-James Soong, both the KMT and DPP could offer incentives to accelerate the dissolution of the PFP. Unfortunately, both the KMT and DPP believe that it will be easier (and cheaper) to simply wait for the PFP to collapse on its own accord. PAAL
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04