Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05BRATISLAVA428 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05BRATISLAVA428 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Bratislava |
| Created: | 2005-06-06 05:38:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | ECON EFIN ETRD LO |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS BRATISLAVA 000428 SIPDIS TREASURY FOR CHRISTOPHER GREWE USDOC FOR MROGERS AND STIMMINS E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: ECON, EFIN, ETRD, LO SUBJECT: KEY TO SUCCESS FOR SLOVAKIA'S FLAT RATE TAX SYSTEM 1. Summary. Slovakia's adoption of a 19-percent flat rate tax for corporations and individuals has generated much attention internationally, but the Slovak general public has been quite mute. Contending international policy camps have cited statistics to support their claims that the system is either a success or a failure. In fact, the success of the system rests in complimentary legislation that promotes a policy of consumption taxes to offset the lowering of tax rates for businesses and most individuals. After the first year, most Slovaks have been left better off or neutral by the flat tax rate, the country's fiscal condition has improved, foreign direct investment (FDI) is soaring -- that should qualify it as a success. End summary. ------- RESULTS ------- 2. The preliminary statistical results of Slovakia's initial year under a 19-percent flat tax regime show that GOS tax revenues increased 4.2 percent from 2003, which is 4.5 percent higher than budget estimates. Clearly this shows that, so far, the new system is a success. However, the results are easy to manipulate to bolster either side of the taxation debate. The reason is that not only did Slovakia adopt a (generally lower) flat tax rate for corporate and individual taxes, but it simultaneously, and largely unrecognized, also moved towards a policy of consumption taxes by unifying and raising its value added tax (VAT) to 19 percent and raising excise taxes on mineral fuels, tobacco and beer. 3. The GOS budgeted that the flat tax rate would reduce tax revenue from individuals and corporations by about 40 and 20 percent respectively during the first year, and that the difference would be made up by increases in VAT and excise taxes. This is essentially what happened, but the results were better than forecasted. Revenue from individual taxes only dropped by about 20 percent and that from corporate taxes actually increased by 2 percent. In addition, VAT and excise taxes showed even stronger gains than forecasted by rising 19 and 14 percent respectively, or about 35 percent higher than targeted. ---------- BACKGROUND ---------- 4. Prior to 2004, Slovakia had a 25 percent corporate tax rate and five different individual income tax rates ranging from 10 to 38 percent with a large majority paying more than 19 percent. In addition, VAT was set at 20 percent for most items and 14 percent for food and other staple products that account for a large portion of expenditures. Unifying the VAT was not necessary for Slovakia to qualify as a flat tax country, but increasing VAT receipts was definitely an important part of the plan. Slovakia is the seventh central/eastern European country to adopt a flat tax rate and it has one of the highest VAT rates of the group. In the end, flat tax regimes are usually more complicated than just leveling the tax burden for each unit of income earned, and they often depend on raising other taxes. -------- REACTION -------- 5. OPPONENTS OF FLAT TAX REGIMES TEND TO OVERLOOK THESE CONSUMPTION TAXES AND INSTEAD CONCENTRATE ON THE FACT THAT SLOVAKIA'S COMBINED CORPORATE AND INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX REVENUES DROPPED OVER 10 PERCENT IN 2004. THEY ALSO POINT OUT THAT LOWER-INCOME-EARNERS WHO ONCE PAID A TAX RATE OF 10 PERCENT NOW FACED A TAX BURDEN ALMOST TWICE AS HIGH. IN ADDITION, THESE SAME PEOPLE NOW HAD TO PAY SUBSTANTIALLY HIGHER TAXES FOR FOOD AND OTHER BASIC NECESSITIES. 6. THE GOS COUNTERS THESE ARGUMENTS BY EXPLAINING THAT AS PART OF THE NEW SYSTEM, STANDARD DEDUCTIONS FOR LOWER INCOME LEVELS WERE INCREASED SIGNIFICANTLY IN ORDER TO LEAVE VIRTUALLY ALL LEVELS OF INCOME EARNERS NO WORSE OFF THAN BEFORE THE INTRODUCTION OF THE FLAT TAX RATE. ALTHOUGH CERTAIN CATEGORIES OF TAX RECEIPTS HAVE DROPPED, THE MORE IMPORTANT MEASURE OF OVERALL GOS TAX REVENUES (INCLUDING VAT AND EXCISE TAXES) ROSE BY 4.2 PERCENT. IN CUTTING THE TAX RATE IN HALF FOR THE HIGHEST INCOME EARNERS, THE GOS HOPED TO SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE THEIR LEVEL OF TAX EVASION. WHILE THIS HAS NOT BEEN AS EFFECTIVE AS ORIGINALLY HOPED FOR, THERE HAS BEEN IMPROVEMENT AND THIS TREND SHOULD CONTINUE INTO THE FUTURE TO MORE CLOSELY MATCH THE RESULTS ACHIEVED BY OTHER FLAT TAX COUNTRIES. ------------ POLL RESULTS ------------ 7. SLOVAK OPPOSITION POLITICIANS HAVE LARGELY BACKED OFF THEIR EARLY CRITICISM OF THE FLAT TAX REGIME, BUT MAINTAIN THAT THEY WOULD REDUCE THE VAT ON FOOD AND OTHER STAPLES. POST HAS NOT HEARD MANY COMPLAINTS ABOUT THE FLAT TAX REGIME AND THE INTERNATIONAL PRESS HAS OFFERED CONSIDERABLE PRAISE FOR IT. SURPRISINGLY, WE HAD NOT SEEN ANY SLOVAK OPINION POLLS ON THE NEW SYSTEM UNTIL LATE MAY. IN A SURVEY BY SME NEWSPAPER, 7.3 PERCENT OF RESPONDENTS SAID THEY WERE BETTER OFF WITH THE FLAT TAX SYSTEM, 40.8 PERCENT SAID THEY SAW NO CHANGE, 21.7 PERCENT HAD NO OPINION, AND 30.2 PERCENT SAID THEY WERE WORSE OFF. LIKE ALL POLLS, THIS ONE USED A SMALL SAMPLE OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC, BUT IT WAS STILL LARGE ENOUGH TO BE STATISTICALLY MEANINGFUL 8. WHILE THE RESULTS OF THIS POLL ARE NOT A STRONG ENDORSEMENT OF THE NEW SYSTEM, THEY SHOULD BE CONSIDERED WITH CULTURAL BIASES IN MIND. SLOVAKS ARE WIDELY RECOGNIZED TO BE AMONG THE MOST PESSIMISTIC PEOPLE IN EUROPE. PAST OPINION POLLS HAVE SHOWN THAT THEY PERCEIVED THE INFLATION RATE TO BE 300 PERCENT HIGHER THAN IT ACTUALLY WAS, THAT REAL WAGE RATES WERE DROPPING (WHEN IN FACT THEY WERE STRONGLY RISING), AND THAT PRICE LEVELS WERE CONSIDERABLY HIGHER THAN THEY ACTUALLY WERE. THE FACT THAT 62.5 PERCENT OF THOSE SURVEYED SAW NO DIFFERENCE OR HAD NO OPINION CAN BE INTERPRETED THAT MOST RESPONDENTS FELT GENERALLY NEUTRAL ABOUT THE NEW SYSTEM. FURTHER RESEARCH INTO THOSE WHO FELT WORSE OFF SHOWED THAT THE LARGE MAJORITY OF THEM IDENTIFIED THEMSELVES WITH THE SLOVAK COMMUNIST PARTY, WHICH IS IN OPPOSITION TO THE GOS. 9. Ministry of Finance (MOF) statistics also support its claim that for nearly all income levels, people paid less in taxes, and for most of those who paid more the increase was insignificant (USD 1-2 per month). During 2004, Slovaks had to contend with rising costs of health care and cuts in social benefits. It is likely that some of the pain of these changes was erroneously blamed on the flat tax regime. ------- COMMENT ------- 10. IN THE BROADEST SENSE, THE NUMBERS POINT TO SLOVAKIA'S FLAT TAX AND CONSUMPTION TAX REGIMES AS BEING SUCCESSFUL. BESIDES INCREASING TAX REVENUES, WHICH HELPED TRIM THE BUDGET DEFICIT AS SLOVAKIA PURSUES ADOPTING THE EURO, THEY ALSO HELPED ATTRACT LARGE AMOUNTS OF FDI THAT WILL IN TURN CREATE JOBS, BOOST EXPORTS, AND HELP DEVELOP THE ECONOMY. ALL OF THESE ATTRIBUTES WILL AID THE COUNTRY'S FISCAL CONDITION FOR YEARS TO COME. AS THE MORE DEVELOPED WELFARE STATES OF THE EU-15, AND THE U.S. FOR THAT MATTER, WATCH AND CONSIDER TAX REFORMS OF THEIR OWN, SLOVAKIA AND OTHER INNOVATORS ARE SCORING POINTS IN THE EARLY ROUNDS OF THE TAX DEBATE. THAYER NNNN
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04