Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05PRETORIA2103 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05PRETORIA2103 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Pretoria |
| Created: | 2005-05-27 14:13:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | ETRD KIPR EFIN ECON SF |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS PRETORIA 002103 SIPDIS DEPT FOR AF/EPS; AF/S TCRAIG USDOC FOR 4510/ITA/IEP/ANESA/OA/J DIEMOND TREASURY FOR OWHYCHE-SHAW AND BRESNICK DEPT PASS USPTO FOR MADLIN DEPT PASS USTR FOR PCOLEMAN AND VESPINEL E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: ETRD, KIPR, EFIN, ECON, SF SUBJECT: REMISSION OF ROYALTIES OUTSIDE OF SOUTH AFRICA 1. Summary. The South African exchange control regulations require that any remittance of money offshore that derives from the payment of royalties must receive exchange control approval from the South African Reserve Bank (SARB). The Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) is responsible for administering royalty payments connected with license agreements. DTI generally approves royalties in the 4-6 percent range. End summary. 2. This cable provides information on the issue of the remission of royalty payments outside of South Africa gleaned from contacts with South African intellectual property lawyers. The South African exchange control regulations require that any remittance of money offshore that derives from the payment of royalties must receive exchange control approval from the South African Reserve Bank (SARB). The Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) is responsible for administering royalty payments connected with license agreements. The local licensee is required to complete a Form DTP001 and submit it to DTI with a copy of the draft royalty agreement. The application for foreign exchange approval is also made to SARB before the contract is finalized and prior to remitting any funds offshore. DTI applies certain norms and guidelines regarding royalties. DTI may provide SARB with some indication of what the level should be. A court case last year held an entire transaction to be invalid because exchange control approval had not been obtained. 3. One lawyer thought the amount of the royalty approved for musical works, pharmaceuticals, and clothing was usually in the range of 4-7 percent, unless the company can prove with substantial evidence that a higher royalty payment is warranted for specific types of goods, for example, by citing the normal royalty rates approved in other countries. Her experience was that the final percentage approved was usually settled in the middle of the 4-7 percent range. According to other lawyers, however, DTI has a range only up to 6 percent, but the amount will depend on the agreement and the usefulness of the technology licensed. 4. One attorney indicated that while there are no specific regulatory constraints regarding the maximum royalty payable, DTI, as part of its policy, identifies two categories of products for the purposes of determining an acceptable royalty rate. He indicated DTI currently allows a maximum of 6 percent for intermediate capital goods to be remitted and a maximum of 4 percent for consumer goods. While the allowable amount is not cast in stone, it is possible but not probable that DTI could be persuaded to increase the royalty amount allowed. At the end of the day, SARB would make the decision. The general view in DTI appears to be that the total payment of any royalties remitted offshore not exceed 6 percent on net ex-works sales less the factory landed costs of any raw material/components imported directly or indirectly from the licensor and value added tax. One lawyer was pleased that his law firm was able recently to persuade DTI to allow a royalty payment of 5 percent concerning a client's distribution of sport and leisure footwear as well as authorization for a license to transfer know-how from the licensor to the local licensee for 5 percent of the ex-factory selling price. 5. In explaining the policy considerations driving DTI's policy, one lawyer said that DTI, in its capacity as administrator, tries to prevent people from paying exorbitant royalties offshore and tries to make sure people are not overpaying for intellectual property rights. In practice, the lawyers have found DTI to apply these general principles on royalties across the board without any distinction between royalties remitted offshore to the United States, the EU, Asia, or Africa. FRAZER
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04