Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05NEWDELHI3932 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05NEWDELHI3932 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy New Delhi |
| Created: | 2005-05-27 05:06:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | ELAB PGOV IN Indian Domestic Politics |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 NEW DELHI 003932 SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/26/2015 TAGS: ELAB, PGOV, IN, Indian Domestic Politics SUBJECT: NDA CALLS FOR STRIKES TO PROTEST DISSOLUTION OF BIHAR ASSEMBLY REF: CALCUTTA 206 Classified By: PolCouns Geoff R. Pyatt for Reasons 1.4 (B, D) 1. (C) Summary: A strike called by the opposition NDA for May 24-25 to protest the government's dissolution of the Bihar Assembly and to demand the removal of Bihar Governor Buta Singh drew a limited response. Clearly not impressed with the strike, the UPA reiterated its support for the Governor and claimed that dissolution was necessary in light of NDA attempts to "buy legislators." State elections will likely be held in October/November, with Laloo Prasad Yadav's RJD in a good position to win. End Summary. Background ---------- 2. (U) The NDA called for state-wide strikes in Bihar on May 24-25 to protest the UPA government's dissolution of the Bihar Assembly (reftel) and to demand the recall of Bihar Governor Buta Singh. The NDA claimed that the UPA dissolved the Legislative Assembly to prevent it from taking power, on the grounds that Congress has a history of manipulating state governments when it fails to win a majority. The NDA accused Singh of acting as a "UPA agent" rather than an "objective arbiter." In Bihar, the strikes received support from some Independent, LJP, and RJD MLAs. In Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, the BJP also held demonstrations outside its Party headquarters. 3. (U) Press reports suggested a weak response to the strike call in Bihar. With the state currently under President's Rule, the UPA deployed heavy security to head off the strikes, and arrested over 1,500 people, including senior NDA leaders. Despite train service disruption in a few areas, railway and vehicular traffic was close to normal, although many shops and businesses closed their doors. In contrast to previous strikes in Bihar, violence was minimal and surprisingly less than expected. Congress Remains Adamant ------------------------ 4. (U) The strikes were intended to demonstrate anti-UPA and anti-Laloo sentiment, but they were not widely observed. The UPA shows no sign of giving in to pressure to remove the Governor. The PM stated that dissolution of the assembly was a necessity because of "horse-trading." National Rural Development Minister Raghuvansh Prasad Singh alleged that the NDA was offering bribes of up to 30 million Rupees (USD 700,000) to LJP legislators willing to defect. 5. (U) Despite low observance, the NDA insisted that the strikes were successful and that they demonstrated that the people of Bihar are angry and frustrated with Governor Singh and the UPA. A senior BJP state leader told ConGen Calcutta of his belief that the UPA will do badly in the upcoming election, as there is a growing divide between the state's two major politicians, Paswan and Laloo. 6. (U) The NDA also announced its intention to stage a large rally in Patna on June 5 to demand the recall of Governor Singh. State BJP President Gopal Narayan Singh went so far as to compare the current situation in Bihar to the infamous Emergency of the 1970s. He later announced that NDA consitutents BJP and JD(U) would hold a massive rally in Patna on June 25 as a day of protest against the UPA's "conspiracy" to dissolve the Bihar Assembly. The state NDA chose this date for the rally because it coincides with the 30th anniversary of the imposition of the Emergency by then PM Indira Gandhi in 1975. Comment ------- 7. (C) NDA claims to the contrary, the Bihar strikes were not effective. Congress knows it must unify the UPA in Bihar before the new election because disunity cost them the race in February. This will take some time, however, and Congress is intent on delaying the election until it has laid the necessary groundwork. The NDA, sensing an opportunity, wants to move the election up to July, and make Laloo's poor reputation and performance the main issue, although revelations of NDA attempts to bribe legislators will not convince voters that it is providing a strong alternative to UPA corruption. Our sources predict that Laloo --with Congress support-- will likely win the elections if they are held in October/November, as expected, although Bihar politics are notoriously difficult to predict. Bihar is currently looking like an NDA v. Laloo race. We may see a more individualistic (rather than party) approach to the state elections this time around. 8. (U) This message was coordinated with Amconsul Calcutta. BLAKE
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04