Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05MUSCAT802 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05MUSCAT802 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Muscat |
| Created: | 2005-05-17 11:50:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | KPAO PREL KMDR SOCI OIIP KISL MU Public Affairs |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS MUSCAT 000802
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR NEA/ARPI, NEA/PPD, NEA/P, P, PA, SA/PPD
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: KPAO, PREL, KMDR, SOCI, OIIP, KISL, MU, Public Affairs
SUBJECT: OUTREACH FOLLOWING NEWSWEEK'S RETRACTION
REF: A. STATE 090992
B. MUSCAT 777
---------------
Embassy Actions
---------------
1. The Embassy e-mailed copies of the May 16 Washington File to
all six major daily newspapers in the Sultanate, and hand-
delivered the article entitled "Newsweek Report of Quran's
Desecration Called Erroneous (Pentagon says report is wrong,
magazine expresses regret)" to the editors of each newspaper.
The article also appears prominently on the front page of the
Embassy's website under the "Middle East and North Africa"
breaking news section.
---------------------
Little Local Traction
---------------------
2. An article appeared below the fold on the front page of the
government-owned Arabic-language daily "Oman" on May 17,
announcing Newsweek's apology but also reporting that British
Muslim detainees confirmed the desecration by U.S. military
interrogators. The privately -owned Arabic-language daily "al-
Watan" carried a much shorter story on page 37 of its May 17
edition about the Pentagon finding no evidence to substantiate
the allegations. The English-language daily "Times of Oman" ran
a front-page article on May 17 under the headline "Skepticism As
Newsweek Backtracks," reporting on the reluctance of Muslims in
Afghanistan and Pakistan to believe the retraction was due to
anything other than USG pressure.
3. Discussions of the original allegations have lost steam on the
Internet message board "Al Sablah," with fewer than ten responses
over the past twenty-four hours.
BALTIMORE
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04