Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05BOGOTA4467 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05BOGOTA4467 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Bogota |
| Created: | 2005-05-12 22:47:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | PGOV KJUS CO |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 BOGOTA 004467 SIPDIS SENSITIVE E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: PGOV, KJUS, CO SUBJECT: OVERVIEW OF COLOMBIAN FEDERAL ELECTORAL ISSUES 1. (U) Summary: This is the first in a series of cables on elections for Congress and President that will take place in March and May, 2006, respectively. The President is elected by nationwide vote. Much like the U.S., House seats are allocated to each department based on population, but the voting method is notably different. Senators are elected nationwide, rather than by district. The number of political parties (currently 60) will reduce sharply in 2006, as 2003 legislation mandates a minimal nationwide vote threshold in House and Senate elections for parties to maintain their official status. Preferential voting (voter selection of individual candidates from party-approved lists) and the D'Hondt method will also come into play for the first time in Congressional elections. Several proposals to allow some pre-election public financing are under consideration in the Congress. Under current law, all campaign spending is from private sources. Candidates are, however, reimbursed from government coffers after the election based on the number of votes received. While spending caps exist for each electoral contest, individual donations are not restricted in monetary terms (unless a donation were to exceed the spending cap). End Summary. The Stakes ---------- 2. (U) Colombians elect the entire House and Senate in March 2006. There are no term limits. The House and Senate are made up of 166 and 102 members, respectively. House seats are allocated to each department (plus Bogota) based on population, much like the U.S. system. However, at the polls, residents of a particular department select only one House candidate from various lists, each containing a number of candidates less than or equal to the number of House seats for that department. (For example, Antioquia Department has 17 House seats; citizens in that department vote for one person for the House, from one of various party lists, each of which contains up to 17 names.) Senate races are decided on a national basis. Each citizen may vote for one person for Senate. 3. (U) Presidential elections will take place in May 2006. If no one candidate receives a majority of the votes in the first round, a runoff election pits the two highest first-round finishers. In late 2004, Congress passed Constitutional reform to permit the President to be re-elected one time. The Constitutional amendment is under review by the Constitutional Court. A decision is expected in September, according to GOC contacts. First Law of 2003 ----------------- 4. (U) In July 2003, Congress passed the First Law, which took effect beginning with departmental assembly and city council elections in October of that year. The law contains three principal elements: --Application of a minimum nationwide vote threshold in Congressional elections for a political party to maintain its official status; --Preferential voting to allow citizens to express preference for one candidate within a party's overall list of candidates for a particular office, regardless of that candidate's original ranking on the list (previously a voter merely selected the party, and could not assign his/her vote to a particular individual on the party's list); and --Use of the D'Hondt method, a highest average system named after Belgian mathematician Victor D'Hondt (see para 8). 5. (U) In mid-March, the Constitutional Court ruled that preferential voting was constitutional, ending legal challenges against it. Preferential voting and D'Hondt divisor do not apply to Presidential, gubernatorial, and mayoral elections, which are direct in nature (i.e., no lists). Vote Threshold -------------- 6. (U) Beginning in 2006, in order for an existing political party (60 at present) to maintain its official status, it will need to meet a minimum nationwide vote threshold (umbral in Spanish) of 2 percent in either/either the House or Senate elections. Two thresholds will be calculated based on the total number of votes cast nationwide for House and Senate, respectively. While projections vary, most estimates hold that only 7-10 parties will maintain their official status after the March elections. Preferential Voting ------------------- 7. (U) Preferential voting, which first came into effect with departmental assembly and city council elections in October 2003, will apply in upcoming Congressional contests. Political parties craft rank-ordered lists of candidates for each office. The party must decide, prior to the election, whether to employ the preferential or non- preferential method. The party's decision will be clearly stated on the ballot. Under the preferential method, the voter may cast a direct vote for any individual within the party's list, regardless of the candidate's ranking on said list. The vote counts toward threshold and D'Hondt (see below) calculations for the party in question. Under the non-preferential method (the only method in use prior to 2003), the voter merely selects the particular party. The vote is then awarded to the candidate the party placed at the top of its list. D'Hondt Method -------------- 8. (U) According to statistical reference materials, the D'Hondt method allocates seats in proportion to the number of votes a list received. After the vote count, successive quotients are calculated for each list. The quotient is calculated using the formula V/(s+1), with V being the total number of votes that list received, and s the number of seats that party has been allocated so far (initially zero for all parties). The list with the highest quotient gets the next seat allocated, and its quotient is recalculated given its new seat total. The process is repeated until all seats have been allocated. While a party receiving relatively few votes may still qualify for a seat under this method, it is considered to favor the parties receiving the most votes per successful candidate. These parties will have a larger quotient, thereby giving them more seats. Generally, these will be the larger parties. Campaign Finance ---------------- 9. (U) While political parties receive small amounts of public funding for ongoing operations (physical plant, salaries, and the like), pre-election campaign finance comes from private sources. Candidates are, however, partially reimbursed from public coffers after the election based on number of votes received. The National Electoral Council (CNE) sets a spending limit for each race. Donations are limited only in the sense that any single gift cannot exceed the spending cap for the race in question. Corporate gifts have traditionally dominated. The Congress is currently considering three proposals for campaign finance reform (in the context of implementing legislation for the recent Constitutional reform to permit Presidential reelection), each of which would provide for additional public financing. Comment ------- 10. (SBU) The impact of the pre-2003 electoral system had been to fragment parties since small parties could still qualify for seats in Congress. The "reforms" may undo that and return Colombia to a system of a few strong parties with highly centralized leadership. It is not clear, however, that this will actually lead to a change in the members of Congress, since current members will generally fall back into the major parties from which they came. If that happens, the party leadership will be strengthened and the responsiveness to constituents may be correspondingly weakened - a reversion to Colombia's political tradition. WOOD
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04