Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 02AMMAN3518 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 02AMMAN3518 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Amman |
| Created: | 2002-06-27 16:24:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PREL KPAL IS JO |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L AMMAN 003518 SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/27/2012 TAGS: PREL, KPAL, IS, JO SUBJECT: UPON REFLECTION...JORDANIAN ESTABLISHMENT INCREASINGLY CRITICAL OF PRESIDENT'S MIDEAST SPEECH REF: A. AMMAN 03461 B. AMMAN 03495 Classified By: AMBASSADOR EDWARD W. GNEHM FOR REASONS 1.5 (B) AND (D) ------- SUMMARY ------- 1. (C) Mainstream Jordanians, who were initially inclined to stress what they considered positives in the President's July 24 speech, are voicing increased criticism after two days of reflection and questioning. The practical effect of calling for Arafat's removal has been a particular point of contention. Jordanians have also taken exception to America's "dictating the outcomes of democracy" and inviting Arab States in need of reform themselves to help democratize the Palestinians. End Summary. ---------------------------------------- ON SECOND THOUGHT...LOTS OF RESERVATIONS ---------------------------------------- 2. (C) Jordanians in the days after the speech have zeroed in on the call for Arafat's removal. Many complain that the U.S. now has virtually ensured Arafat's re-election. One East Bank Law professor, who welcomed some elements in the U.S. position, opined that any Palestinian who is elected before the end of the Israeli occupation will be thought of as "agent leadership" and will be assumed to be working for the Americans and Israelis. East Banker and Speaker of the Upper House Zeid Rifai cautioned that Americans should not interpret the widespread Palestinian disaffection from Arafat's rule as a willingness to remove him, least of all at the urging of outsiders. Rifai and other Establishment figures told the Ambassador that Palestinian anger towards the U.S. has not lessened as a result of the speech. 3. (C) At the same time, Rifai also praised the official positive GOJ reaction, which left room for maneuvering. The GOJ continues to press the positive elements of the speech. The Jordan Times--Jordan's English daily--ran a large headline the day after welcoming the President's speech and official editorials in the semi-official Al-Rai paper have applauded the speech as being consistent with Jordan's vision. (See Refs for media reaction). 4. (C) While many Palestinian Jordanians are still voicing appreciation for the call for a Palestinian state and an end to the occupation, most still criticized the "humiliating" and "patronizing" tone of the speech. Many frankly view the speech as the fulfillment of Sharon's wishes (no doubt partly because of the triumphant tone in some Israeli reactions cited in the press). Almost all Palestinians here favor reform, but view it as a matter for Palestinians themselves. --------------------------------------------- ------- HELP FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORM FROM UNDEMOCRATIC STATES? --------------------------------------------- ------- 5. (C) Another message that is also under review here is the call for Arab States to help reform the PA. Some contacts pointed out the irony of asking Saudi Arabia, which has never held national elections, to assist the PA in doing so. One Palestinian contact, who supports Bush's call for reform, accused the PA of being a carbon copy of the Arab States and asked hypothetically how you could ask the PA to reform without demanding the same of other regional states. ------- COMMENT ------- 6. (C) Most Jordanians still agree with the endgame as described in the President's June 24 speech and welcome his expression of it. However, most are doubtful that the Palestinians can or will move ahead without Arafat. More broadly, many believe that the U.S. has set the bar impossibly high by asking the Palestinians to create a new constitutional system under the guns of an "aggressive" occupying power intent (in their view) on extending the occupation indefinitely. Gnehm
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04