US embassy cable - 05NEWDELHI3430

Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.

GOI "STEAMROLLERED" INTO VOTING FOR UNCHR WORKING GROUP, WILL RECONSIDER THE ISSUE

Identifier: 05NEWDELHI3430
Wikileaks: View 05NEWDELHI3430 at Wikileaks.org
Origin: Embassy New Delhi
Created: 2005-05-06 11:28:00
Classification: CONFIDENTIAL
Tags: PHUM IN Human Rights
Redacted: This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks.
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

061128Z May 05
C O N F I D E N T I A L NEW DELHI 003430 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPARTMENT FOR IO/SHA - SMEHRA,S/UNR - JGERAN AND USUN FOR 
MZACK 
 
E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/05/2015 
TAGS: PHUM, IN, Human Rights 
SUBJECT: GOI "STEAMROLLERED" INTO VOTING FOR UNCHR WORKING 
GROUP, WILL RECONSIDER THE ISSUE 
 
REF: STATE 82967 
 
Classified By: PolCouns Geoff Pyatt, for Reasons 1.4 (B, D) 
 
1.  (C) Responding to Reftel demarche, MEA Joint Secretary 
(UN Economic and Social) Manjeev Puri told PolCouns on May 5 
that India was "steamrollered" into voting for the resolution 
to create a UNCHR Working Group to consider reform proposals. 
 The resolution sponsors forced a vote on the last day, when 
the delegates wanted to finish all business and depart, and 
India went along.  India would like to exercise a moderating 
influence on the debate, Puri said, noting that the GOI 
should be able to "take a better approach" when the issue 
arises in the ECOSOC "now that there is time" to consider it 
more fully. 
 
2.  (C) On May 6, MEA Deputy Secretary (UN Economic and 
Social) Gopal Baglay clarified to Poloff that the Indian 
delegation saw the text of the resolution only the day before 
the vote, and agreed that there was little consideration 
given to the Indian vote. 
 
3.  (U) We will need to remain engaged with New Delhi as this 
issue comes to a head again, but the GOI is now on notice 
regarding our views. 
BLAKE 

Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04