Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05BRUSSELS1685 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05BRUSSELS1685 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Brussels |
| Created: | 2005-04-28 15:13:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PREF PHUM SMIG LY USEU BRUSSELS |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 BRUSSELS 001685 SIPDIS DEPARTMENT FOR PRM/AFR -- PLEASE ALSO FORWARD TO USLO TRIPOLI; CAIRO FOR REFCOORD, GENEVA FOR RMA E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/28/2015 TAGS: PREF, PHUM, SMIG, LY, USEU BRUSSELS SUBJECT: DEMARCHE RESPONSE: UNHCR STATUS AND ACCESS TO REFUGEES IN LIBYA REF: STATE 72108 Classified By: PRMOFF MARC J. MEZNAR. REASONS 1.4 (B) AND (D). 1. (C) Summary. On April 21, PRMOff delivered reftel message to Nicola Annecchino, European Commission (EC) Head of Unit for Asylum and Migration Issues at Directorate General Justice Freedom and Security (JFS), regarding the status of UNHCR and the plight of asylum seekers in Libya. During a follow-up meeting with Annecchino and his staff on April 26, he said the EC fully agreed with the Department,s analysis of the situation and shared USG concerns, but is unlikely to deliver a demarche to the Libyan government on this specific issue. The EU stresses that international protection is one part of a comprehensive dialogue it seeks to establish with Libya and will not "cherry pick" an issue. End Summary. ------------------------ Trying to Chart an EU-Libya relationship ------------------------ 2. (C) Annecchino said that efforts to improve Libya,s structure and practices with regard to international protection are part of a comprehensive framework discussion between the European Union (EU) and Libya. Currently, relations between the EU and Libya are in a state of limbo; Libya is not a partner of the EU,s Barcelona process that unites the Mediterranean rim countries. Concerns over the treatment of refugees and asylum seekers are part of a broader migration agenda that also covers illegal immigration and trafficking in persons. Given the unabated flow of clandestine migrants through Libya, and the ensuing pressure put on the EU,s southern flank in Italy and Malta, the EU is keenly aware of and interested in reaching a comprehensive agreement with Libya on migration and asylum issues. 3. (C) In November 2004, the EC led an assessment mission to Libya that included fourteen experts from Member States, as well as EUROPOL, to analyze conditions at ports of entry, land and sea borders and camps for asylum seekers and other migrants. The GoL was cooperative and seemed willing to work with the EU on what might be done collectively to improve conditions. Following the assessment mission, JFS Commissioner Frattini sent a report to the European Council. Currently, the EC is awaiting a response from the Council to authorize technical cooperation with Libya in the area of asylum and migration. One complication, which may delay a green light, is the fate of the Bulgarian medical personnel facing the death sentence in Libya. 4. (C) Annecchino said the EC is not quite certain how to approach Libya if the green light should come from the Council. He characterized Libya as a very strange place where one mercurial person calls the shots. He also noted that Libyan government concerns and social tension caused by the influx of sub-Saharans may prevent genuine action on the part of Libyans even if an agreement is reached. Demographic trends indicate that within five years Arabs in Libya may be outnumbered by sub-Saharans. Furthermore, as a resource-rich country, Libya is not in need of funding for activities (as other problematic neighbors, such as Albania and Morocco, have been). The EU,s only significant carrot is international acceptance. Annecchino said the EU would consider enhancing its bilateral and regional relationships (such as the current 5 plus 5 group in the trans-Mediterranean region) to gain Libyan cooperation in the area of asylum and migration. ------------------------ Managing migration and enhancing protection ------------------------ 5. (C) The EC has met with UNHCR regarding an effective way to approach Libya. Both share the concern that convincing the GoL to sign the Geneva Refugee Convention may simply provide them with a "fig leaf" to gain international approval without any true commitment to manage migration in a humane manner and/or offer genuine international protection. (Note. UNHCR regional representative Judith Kumin confirmed this to PRMOff in a separate meeting on April 26. End Note.) For this reason, the EC currently feels that it would be best to convince Libya to act on commitments that it already has subscribed to, like the OAU convention on refugees and the Palermo convention on trafficking. 6. (C) When asked about Libya,s actual ability to control its borders, Annecchino said that despite its lengthy land border, there were actually very few trans-Saharan routes used by migrants, smugglers and traffickers. He felt Libya could easily stop migration if it decided to, although reinstating a visa regime with African countries would be difficult politically. With regard to the clandestine maritime crossings, Annecchino also felt that Libyan authorities could open and close the tap at will. ------------------------ The EU-Italy dimension ------------------------ 7. (C) The whole situation in Libya with regard to asylum and migration is seriously complicated within the EU because of the actions undertaken in southern Italy, particularly on the island of Lampedusa, as well as by bilateral initiatives between Italy and Libya. Annecchino noted that the European Parliament had issued a statement on April 14 calling on Italy to stop the collective expulsions of asylum seekers and irregular migrants to Libya, highlighting the ill treatment there and possibility of refoulment for true refugees. The statement argued that "the Italian authorities failed in their international obligations by not making sure that the lives of the people they expelled were not threatened in their countries of origin." 8. (C) Annecchino said that UNHCR had raised these same concerns with the EC. However, Italy has assured the EU that it conducts individual assessments of arrivals and does not engage in collective deportations. Annecchino said the EC stands ready to provide technical support to Italy in handling the migration crisis should they request it. 9. (C) Annecchino said that the EC wished to continue sharing information with the U.S. regarding the situation within Libya, particularly as it related to asylum and migration issues. He noted the particular interest of Commissioner Frattini (an Italian citizen) with regard to this sensitive issue and highlighted the public statements Frattini has made urging Libya to extend international protection to those in need. ------------------------ Comment ------------------------ The fact that many of the EC officials working on the Libyan dimension of migration and asylum, from the JFS Commissioner on down, are Italian citizens underscores the critical importance of the Italian dimension as the EC handles Libya. That migration and asylum in Italy, as in most other EU countries, carries a political punch also increases the sensitivity. USEU recommends taking the EC up on its suggestion to share information about conditions for asylum seekers and other migrants in Libya, perhaps at an upcoming meeting of the EURASIL group. MCKINLEY .
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04