Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05TAIPEI1851 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05TAIPEI1851 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | American Institute Taiwan, Taipei |
| Created: | 2005-04-20 08:36:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | ECON PGOV PREL TW |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 TAIPEI 001851 SIPDIS USDA FAS FOR OA; CMP/DLP STATE PASS AIT/W E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/20/2015 TAGS: ECON, PGOV, PREL, TW SUBJECT: LOBBYING FOR BEEF: TECHNICAL EXPERTISE AND DIPLOMATIC INTERVENTION Classified By: AIT Director Douglas H. Paal, Reason 1.4 (b/d) 1. (C) Summary. The fifteen-month odyssey to end the Taiwan ban on U.S. beef imports concluded April 16, with the formal announcement that the ban was lifted. The first beef shipments are expected to arrive in Taiwan by the end of April. Even at the last moment, when the battle appeared won, new bureaucratic and political obstacles rose to obstruct lifting the ban. These complex negotiations required the tandem effort of technical agricultural/economic consultations and political/ diplomatic intervention. At critical junctures in the negotiation end game, the AIT Director had to weigh in at the highest levels in Taipei to maintain forward momentum. With legislative opposition to Taipei's decision to lift the ban continuing, AIT will work with both government and legislators to ensure accurate information on the U.S. beef inspection system. End Summary. 2. (U) On Christmas Eve, 2003, Taiwan imposed a temporary suspension on U.S. beef and beef product imports, which had totaled U.S. $325 million that year. Over the next fifteen months, USDA officials in Washington and at AIT worked with Taiwan health and agricultural authorities to convey detailed technical information and respond to numerous questions in an effort to lift the temporary beef import suspension. Undersecretary Penn and other USDA officials and scientists corresponded with and traveled to Taiwan to press the scientific case for lifting the ban. The strongest reservoir of resistance came from the Council of Agriculture (COA). 3. (C) In his introductory call on the new Premier, Frank Hsieh (Chang-ting), on February 14, the AIT Director urged the Taiwan government to lift the ban on U.S. beef, calling the Premier,s attention to the abundance of scientific data USDA had provided to Taiwan authorities. On March 18 and 19, the Minister of Foreign Affairs and the Premier separately informed the Director that the decision had been made to re-open the market. At a dinner with President Chen Shui-bian and Premier Hsieh on March 21, the Director again raised the beef import ban, urging that U.S. beef imports be resumed as soon as possible. Both men voiced their strong support for lifting the ban. 4. (U) In mid-March, however, several Legislative Yuan (LY) members began publicly voicing objections to lifting the ban. Taipei Solidarity Union (TSU) legislator Lai Hsin-yuan challenged the government's plans to reopen the Taiwan market to American beef, charging the government deliberately ignored questions raised by the COA about the risks of BSE contamination from imported American beef. The Director telephoned Lai on March 16, using points prepared by the AIT Agriculture Section to describe the U.S. safeguards in place. He explained how, contrary to her allegations, which may have been fed her by COA, this is properly a Health Ministry issue and how the ministry,s actions in preparing to reopen the market are all fully in accord with the guidelines of the World Animal Health Organization. AIT Agriculture Section followed up by providing Lai with supporting documentation. The COA, however, continued its opposition to lifting the ban and sought to devise administrative procedures to effectively continue the ban. 5. (C) The AIT Director telephoned National Security Council (NSC) Secretary General Chiou I-Jen -- who had been present at the March 21 dinner during which both President and Premier voiced their strong support for rescinding the ban -- calling Chiou,s attention to COA maneuvering to block rescission of the ban and requesting his assistance. On March 24, SecGen Chiou called the Director to inform him that DOH had just published a notice on its website lifting the ban on U.S. beef imports. NSC Senior Advisor Connie Yang, he explained, had convinced the COA to back off its demands. The DOH notice, however, listed several conditions, including the seemingly innocuous requirement that the beef must come from animals &born, raised, and slaughtered in the U.S.8 The "born in" provision reflected the concern of Taiwan health authorities over USDA plans to resume imports of live cattle from Canada, since this raised the possibility that banned Canadian beef might be exported to Taiwan via the U.S. The "born in" requirement would be impossible for USDA to meet, however, because of the ongoing and well-established U.S. animal trade with Mexico. 6. (C) Taiwan authorities proved receptive to USDA explanations on the nature of the U.S. cattle industry. Given the highly partisan nature of Taiwan politics, however, it would have been politically difficult for DOH to make a high-profile public correction of the March 24 announcement. AIT, moreover, wanted to maintain a low public profile on this discussion to avoid politicizing the issue and encouraging possible negative public reaction. Additional meetings between the AIT Agricultural Section and DOH, and an exchange of letters between USDA and DOH, resolved the "born in" issue. DOH agreed that U.S. beef export documents stating that beef &derived from cattle under the age of thirty months slaughtered in the United States" satisfied their intention that beef be produced in the U.S. The letters were also sufficient for USDA to begin writing Wholesomeness and Export Certificates on April 16, with the first beef shipments expected to arrive in coming days. There will not, however, be an immediate DOH public announcement modifying the "born in" phrase. 7. (U) While public reaction since the March 24 announcement has been largely positive, Legislative Yuan (LY) member Lai Hsin-yuan called a press conference on April 16 to challenge the decision and to threaten the DOH with legal action. On April 19, Lai filed an appeal with the Executive Yuan Appeal Committee seeking to overturn the DOH decision to resume U.S. beef imports. Legislator Winston Dang has requested AIT to provide information on the U.S. beef inspection process in regard to Lai,s appeal. 8. (C) Comment. The heavy comprehensive series of technical discussions and documentary evidence marshalled by USDA was essential at every step of the way in the rescission fight. At the same time, facts and scientific data could go only so far before running into hard political walls in Taiwan. In such a highly politicized environment, AIT lobbying helped the government find the political will to lift the U.S. beef import ban. AIT will continue closely following -- and countering with information and data -- Lai,s appeal and any other legislative opposition that develops. PAAL
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04