Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05DARESSALAAM702 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05DARESSALAAM702 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Dar Es Salaam |
| Created: | 2005-04-11 04:53:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | KHIV EAID SOCI TBIO KSCA TZ |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS DAR ES SALAAM 000702 SIPDIS FOR AF/E, AF/RSA, AND S/GAC PLEASE PASS USAID FOR GH/OHA SENSITIVE E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: KHIV, EAID, SOCI, TBIO, KSCA, TZ SUBJECT: CHIEFS OF MISSION DISCUSS PEPFAR, DONOR COORDINATION, HIV/AIDS STRATEGIC PLANNING 1. Charge on March 23 hosted a lunch for Chiefs of Mission of donor countries resident in Dar es Salaam with substantial HIV/AIDS programs. Present were Chiefs of Mission from Canada, UK, Germany, Norway, Japan, Ireland, and Denmark. Chiefs of Mission from The Netherlands and Sweden were invited but were unable to attend. 2. Charge began the working lunch with a description of our PEPFAR program, and a brief summary of our Five Year Strategy. Charge outlined our programs in prevention, care, and treatment, provided details on our level of cooperation with the GOT, and described our work with various partner organizations and civil society. Charge shared a copy of our draft Five Year Strategy with each COM, and made a strong pitch for close cooperation and coordination of our activities in combating HIV/AIDS, to avoid duplication of effort and to optimize overall use of donor funding. 3. COMs reacted very positively to this initiative, and expressed appreciation for the level of detailed information provided. All indicated a strong interest in closer coordination of our activities, particularly in strategic planning over the next five years. We agreed to meet on a regular basis, perhaps every 4-6 months, to review program details. 4. Several donors (UK, Denmark, Norway, and Ireland) noted that they provide primarily budget support to the Ministry of Health, Tanzanian AIDS Commission, or other GOT entities in support of Tanzania?s National Care and Treatment Plan. They cautioned against creation of ?parallel systems? through PEPFAR, and urged that PEPFAR focus on supporting existing systems and building capacity. Interestingly, the Danish Ambassador said that even though his Government provides budget support, he felt the absorptive capacity of the GOT is reaching its limits, and that working with other organizations was important. The Japanese Ambassador reiterated this view. 5. The Canadian High Commissioner voiced concerns that with all the donor assistance in HIV/AIDS, other components of the Tanzanian health care delivery system may be ignored, or could start to deteriorate. The German Ambassador seconded this view, and urged building the capacity of institutions such as the Medical Stores Department, which would have important consequences for the entire system. 6. All COMs agreed to study our Five Year Strategy in light of their own HIV/AIDS programs, and to look for areas of duplication that can be eliminated. We agreed to meet again to compare notes, and try to identify those program or geographic areas where there are significant gaps, and to discuss jointly how we might address these gaps. We all agreed to continue coordination of our long-term strategies and to consult on a regular basis. OWEN
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04