Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05TAIPEI1343 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05TAIPEI1343 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | American Institute Taiwan, Taipei |
| Created: | 2005-03-23 09:18:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | EINV EFIN ECON PINR TW |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available. 230918Z Mar 05
C O N F I D E N T I A L TAIPEI 001343 SIPDIS STATE PLEASE PASS AIT/W AND USTR STATE FOR EAP/RSP/TC, EAP/EP AND EB/IFD/OIA USTR FOR SCOTT KI USDOC FOR 4420/USFCS/OCEA/EAP/LDROKER USDOC FOR 3132/USFCS/OIO/EAP/ADAVENPORT TREASUREY FOR OASIA/LAILEE MOGHTADER TREASURY PLEASE PASS TO OCC/AMCMAHON TREASURY ALSO PASS TO FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD OF GOVERNORS, AND SAN FRANCISCO FRB/TERESA CURRAN E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/21/2025 TAGS: EINV, EFIN, ECON, PINR, TW SUBJECT: TAIWAN POLITICS AND EXPORT CONTROL REF: TAIPEI 709 Classified By: AIT DIRECTOR DOUGLAS PAAL, REASON 1.5 B/D 1. (SBU) The State NP EXBS (Export Control and Border Security) training on Export Control Laws and Regulations began on March 22 with 38 participants representing 16 different Taiwan Executive Branch agencies, one Legislative Yuan (LY) Member, and one LY staffer. After official opening remarks from Bureau of Foreign Trade (BOFT) Director General Franco Huang, the EXBS Team Leader Peter Klason and AIT, LY Member, Chen Yin-Ho (TSU/Taoyuan) gave unscheduled opening remarks in which he stressed his support for stricter export controls in Taiwan. 2. (C) Legislator Chen Yin-ho, a member of the LY Science and Technology Committee, later told AIT that the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) is the only political party pushing for a detailed investigation of the technology transfer case involving United Microelectronic Company's (UMC, the world's second largest foundry producer of integrated circuit chips) investment in the He Jian Company of China. Chen said that UMC had never registered the He Jian investment project with the Ministry of Economic Affairs and never reported what technologies were transferred by UMC to He Jian although law requires these. Chen said this was a very serious violation from a technology protection point of view. Chen thought He Jian's recent offer of 15% equity to compensate UMC for its technology was proof of the violation of law, but not sufficient to make up for the losses suffered by UMC shareholders and Taiwan as a whole. Chen believed that aggressively pursuing cases of illegal transfers of high technology was in the common interest of Taiwan and the United States. TSMC in Contrast with UMC SIPDIS -------------------------------------- 3. (C) Legislator Chen told AIT that prior to its investment in China, the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation (TSMC) held meetings with the Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) in which it provided a detailed list of technologies that it intended to transfer to its subsidiary in China. MOEA withheld approval until the list had been cleared by U.S. government agencies. Chen said there will be a public hearing on the draft &Technology Protection Law8 on March 29 and invited AIT ECON to attend. Politics a Factor ---------------------- 4. (C) Huang Wen-jur, a senior consultant at one of Taiwan's large securities companies told AIT that politics was a factor behind the TSU attacks on UMC. According to Huang, the UMC Chairman Robert Tsao, and He Jian Chairman Shu Jian-hua were both close friends and supporters of People's First Party (PFP) Chairman Soong Chu-yu. Huang believed that the TSU was angered by the new cooperation between President Chen Shui-bian and angered by the anti-secession law and looking for a way strike back. The UMC case presented an opportunity for the TSU to 1) voice solidarity with the United States on a Taiwan security issue, 2) make high-tech investors think twice about investing in China and make Taiwan people think about the consequences for Taiwan of such investment, and 3) punish the PFP and make it difficult for the President to reconcile with the PFP. TSU has long tried to use the export control issue to advance its own political agenda of restricting trade and investment in China. PAAL
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04