Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05TAIPEI1225 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05TAIPEI1225 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | American Institute Taiwan, Taipei |
| Created: | 2005-03-22 08:54:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PREL PGOV TW Cross Strait Politics |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L TAIPEI 001225
SIPDIS
STATE PASS AIT/W
E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/01/2015
TAGS: PREL, PGOV, TW, Cross Strait Politics
SUBJECT: TAIPEI WELCOMES SECRETARY'S PUBLIC REMARKS IN
BEIJING
REF: A. 2004 TAIPEI 3353
B. TAIPEI 1188
Classified By: AIT Director Douglas Paal, Reason: 1.4 (B/D)
1. (C) Taiwan officials have expressed appreciation for
Secretary Rice's public remarks on the Anti-Secession Law and
SIPDIS
Taiwan Relations Act during her March 20-21 visit to Beijing.
Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) Chairman Joseph Wu told AIT
the Secretary's statements were "wonderful" and would help
refute Taiwan media and opposition claims that the USG had
"accepted" the PRC's new law. Wu added that the Secretary's
Tokyo call for democratization on the Mainland was also
warmly welcomed in Taipei. MOFA North American Affairs
Section Chief Vincent Yao told AIT that Foreign Minister Mark
Chen is drafting a letter to thank the Secretary personally
for her public statements on the Anti-Secession Law before
and during her Beijing visit. Yao added that Taipei also
appreciated the Secretary's request that Beijing take steps
to reduce cross-Strait tensions in the wake of the
Anti-Secession Law's enactment.
2. (SBU) The Taiwan media's coverage of the Secretary's visit
was less sensational than is usually the case with high-level
U.S.-China meetings. Reports focused on the Secretary's
characterization of the PRC law as "unwelcome," the absence
of any reference to U.S. "non-support" or "opposition" to
Taiwan independence, and public inclusion of the Taiwan
Relations Act in her statement on U.S. China policy. While
one analysis in the pro-opposition United Daily News
contrasted the Secretary's "mild" rebuke to Beijing over the
Anti-Secession Law to President Bush's strong 2003 warning to
"Taiwan's leaders" over changing the status quo, most media
reports credited the USG with striking an effective balance
in the relationship.
3. (C) Both MAC and the Foreign Ministry issued press
releases on March 21 thanking the Secretary for her firm
statements on the Anti-Secession Law. Executive Yuan
Spokesman Cho Jung-tai told reporters that the Secretary's
comments "clearly articulated" U.S. opposition to the
Anti-Secession Law. National Security Council (NSC) Senior
Advisor Lin Jin-chang told AIT that the NSC instructed
government agencies in advance not to "over-interpret" the
Secretary's public remarks in Beijing. Lin said that as long
SIPDIS
as the visit was not portrayed in the Taiwan media as a major
setback to Taiwan, the government's efforts to prevent
pro-independence fundamentalists from hijacking the March 26
Taipei mass rally will remain on track.
Comment: A Welcome Message
--------------------------
4. (C) The public messages coming out of the Secretary's
visit have clearly come as a relief to officials in Taipei.
In the lead-up to the visit, many AIT interlocutors recalled
with trepidation the media and political fallout that
resulted from former Secretary Powell's media interviews
during and after his October 2004 visit to Beijing (Ref A).
Taipei received exactly what it asked for from the
Secretary's visit (Ref B), at least in public diplomacy
SIPDIS
terms. Officials say that the Secretary's public remarks
will boost the government's efforts to block demands from
pro-independence fundamentalists for a more destabilizing
reaction to the PRC's Anti-Secession Law.
PAAL
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04