Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05MONTREAL323 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05MONTREAL323 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Consulate Montreal |
| Created: | 2005-03-15 12:22:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | ODIP AORC EAIR CA ICAO |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 MONTREAL 000323 SIPDIS FROM USMISSION ICAO STATE FOR DS/OFM, L/DL, and IO E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: ODIP, AORC, EAIR, CA, ICAO SUBJECT: CANADA DOWNGRADES ACCEPTANCE OF REPRESENTATIVES TO ICAO FROM DIPLOMATIC TO INTERNATIONAL 1. Summary and action request. The Government of Canada has instituted an "administrative change" in its "acceptance" of diplomats representing their governments to ICAO. The category of acceptance (permission to remain in Canada) stamped in diplomatic passports has been downgraded from "diplomatic" to "international." The unilateral change, for which no reason has been given, has angered Permanent Representatives to ICAO and has already resulted in at least one dispute involving a diplomat who was turned away from the diplomatic line at Dorval Airport. The GOC has written to ICAO assuring that diplomatic privileges and immunities (Ps and Is) remain unchanged. The Secretary General will be meeting with a GOC protocol officer on this matter the week of March 28th. US Mission requests a Department reaction as soon as possible so it may feed US input to the Secretary General and to the Canadian Representative (in his host country capacity) in time for the meeting. Department may also wish to consider a demarche to the GOC in Ottawa and in Washington. End summary and action request. 2. At the March 9 meeting of the ICAO Council, the Ethiopian Permanent Representative announced that he had recently applied for a new diplomatic visa. As required by ICAO's host country agreement, he submitted his application through ICAO's Office of External Relations (OER). When his passport came back, instead of having "diplomatic" stamped as his category of acceptance by the GOC, it was marked "International." He wanted to know if there had been an amendment to the host country agreement and if so, what this meant for his diplomatic status and privileges. If there had been no amendment, he asked how the GOC had the right to unilaterally change the status notified by the Government of Ethiopia from "diplomatic" to "international." A number of other delegates complained about the recent use of the "international" acceptance for their passports. 3. The Secretariat responded that ICAO had been advised by the GOC last Fall that an administrative change had taken place affecting the category of acceptance, but this would not affect the Ps and Is enjoyed by Representatives assigned to ICAO. Delegates demanded to know why the OER had never informed member states. The Secretary General promised to get back to the Council with more information. 4. On March 11, the SyG explained the following: On October 27, 2004, the GOC had sent a letter to ICAO stating that as of that date, all diplomats accredited to ICAO would be categorized as "international." In December, ICAO requested clarification of the term "international," and was told that there was no difference between the diplomatic and international categories. The Ps and Is enjoyed by the diplomats would not change. On February 9, 2005, the SyG wrote to Canada's Chief of Protocol expressing concern and asking for a return of the diplomatic stamp for Representatives to ICAO. The GOC refused the request in writing. On March 10 the Canadian Office of Protocol sent ICAO another letter reaffirming that there would be no change in privileges under the headquarters agreement, and informing that all airports and agencies had been instructed that Representatives to ICAO should be treated as diplomats when they enter the country. The letter also said that if representatives encountered problems at the border, the Canadian Office of Protocol might be willing to re-examine the matter. 5. Quoting from the host country agreement, which grants diplomats to ICAO the same Ps and Is as those accorded to bilateral missions under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, Spain informed the Council that one of his colleagues had already been stopped from going through the diplomatic line at Dorval airport and was permitted access only after a lengthy debate with the Canadian official. 6. India, Chile, Australia, Peru, South Africa, Russia, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Argentina, Colombia, Honduras, Pakistan and Ethiopia also intervened to complain about the change. They argued: Their governments had notified them as diplomats but the GOC had relegated them to a lesser status; it was inaccurate and confusing to categorize representatives to ICAO as international civil servants; the diplomats would now have to carry a letter from Protocol in addition to their passports to prove that they receive diplomatic Ps and Is and there was no guarantee that a border bureaucrat would accept the letter; since the GOC had not negotiated a change in the host country agreement, the GOC was not in a position to change the categorization of diplomats to ICAO. They all wanted to know why ICAO hadn't advised the Council of the change that had been made five months earlier. Egypt demanded a legal analysis of whether the GOC was within its rights absent renegotiation of the host country agreement. The Director of the Legal Bureau, quoting Article 12 of the host country agreement, said that as long as ICAO representatives receive the same Ps and Is as diplomats under the VCDR, there was no violation. He added, however, that ICAO would have to monitor the practical consequences of this change. When the OER acknowledged that bilateral diplomats continued to receive a diplomatic stamp in their passports, while representatives to ICAO were now getting the same stamp as ICAO secretariat officials at the P-4 level and above, some delegations said this proved that, contrary to GOC assurances, there really were two different classes of diplomats serving in Canada. 7. Action Request. The Secretary General reported that Canada's Office of Protocol would be sending a representative to Montreal the week of May 28th to discuss this issue. Mission requests the Department's opinion on this matter before then so that we may provide the Secretary General with additional input for his meeting. Depending upon the Department's analysis, it may also wish to consider a demarche to Ottawa and to the Canadian Embassy in Washington prior to the ICAO-GOC meeting. SERWER ALLEN
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04