Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05PARIS1611 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05PARIS1611 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Paris |
| Created: | 2005-03-10 17:04:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PREL PGOV PBTS RS GG MD FR OSCE |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L PARIS 001611 SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/09/2015 TAGS: PREL, PGOV, PBTS, RS, GG, MD, FR, OSCE SUBJECT: FRANCE "CAUTIOUS" ON EU-LED BMO MISSION, RECEIVE RUSSIAN PROPOSAL ON TRANSNISTRIA REF: PARIS 1178 Classified By: POLITICAL MINISTER-COUNSELOR JOSIAH ROSENBLATT, FOR REAS ONS 1.4 B/D 1. (C) Pierre Cochard, DAS-equivalent for Russia and the former Soviet states, told Poloff March 10 that France was not firmly opposed to a EU-led BMO in Georgia, but that it was being "cautious" based on the swirl of other options available and ESDP funding constraints. Cochard bemoaned the lack of a unified front with the Russians regarding the BMO; he thought it still possible that Russia could be convinced to acquiesce to an OSCE monitoring and training mission along the Georgian border with Russia. He said the EU was discussing three options: 1) a modest reinforcement of the EU Mission in Georgia; 2) a full-fledged EU monitoring mission; and 3) a combined EU monitoring and training mission. The EU, said Cochard, would probably decide on the first option as an interim measure, and later, if necessary, it would consider the second and third options. He reiterated that France, despite reports to the contrary, was not categorically opposed to the second option if circumstances warranted such a decision. 2. (C) Cochard raised reftel demarche on a Russian proposal for bilateral dialogue on Transnistria, saying that the MFA had recently received the expected Russian demarche. The Russians cited the Kozak Plan, said Cochard, which he did not believe they had raised when delivering a similar demarche in Washington. As reported in reftel, Cochard said the MFA would accept the Russian offer, believing it would be difficult to reject such a proposal for dialogue. French goals for these bilateral consultations would be to convince the Russians to accept an expanded seven-party dialogue, to include the EU and the U.S, said Cochard. Leach
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04