Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05YEREVAN420 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05YEREVAN420 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Yerevan |
| Created: | 2005-03-09 11:44:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | KPAO AM KMDR OPRC PREL |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available. 091144Z Mar 05
UNCLAS YEREVAN 000420 SIPDIS DEPT FOR INR/R/MR-STHIBEAULT, EUR/PPD-JQUINTUS AND JBASEDOW, EUR/CACEN-ESIDEREAS, EUR, EUR/ACE, EUR/SNEC, EUR/SE E.O. 12958; N/A TAGS: KPAO, AM, KMDR, OPRC, PREL SUBJECT: ARMENIA PRESS REACTION: RELEASE OF HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT 2004 ------- SUMMARY ------- 1. Public reaction to the release of the 2004 Human Rights Report was muted. According to most Armenian press, the report was "as expected," which explains the limited editorial response. Oppositionist press anticipated a Human Rights Report that would let the GOAM off easy, and characterized the 2004 version as doing just that. The pro-government media expected criticism, found it, complained, and then tried to downplay the report's findings. The following is a summary of press commentary. End Summary. --------------------------- "UNCLE SAM HOLDS THE LEASH" --------------------------- 2. HAYOTS ASHKAR, a pro-government daily newspaper often critical of the U.S., remarked March 2, "Uncle Sam holds the leash of the whole world.and has political and vital interests across the universe. (This report) is in fact a means to pressure those countries where the U.S. has vital interests." The article goes on to say, "as expected, the 2004 report is very critical of Armenia." --------------------------------------------- -- OPPOSITIONIST PRESS - U.S. EXPECTATIONS TOO LOW --------------------------------------------- -- 3. ARAVOT, an oppositionist daily, on March 2, took the opposite tact, saying that the Human Rights Report failed to cover the true scope of human rights violations in Armenia. "Of course the report is not the high truth. It is more a policy. But, when one is being criticized for minor things it means there are no high expectations. In fact we have more dissatisfaction regarding human rights in Armenia (than is in this report), but the Americans just keep silent about it." --------------------------------------------- ------ PRO-GOVT PRESS - "STATE OF HUMAN RIGHTS SUFFICIENT" --------------------------------------------- ------ 4. On March 3, in a full-page feature article, HAYOTS ASHKAR dismissed criticism in the Human Rights Report, characterizing the incidents of human rights abuse mentioned as, "carelessness" and due to "a lack of seriousness typical of Armenians." The article went on to warn, "the authorities must be more reserved.because even minor incidents of political and civil rights abuse can be used to put pressure on Armenia." 5. In the same article, HAYOTS ASHKAR went on to say, "Based on a study of the Human Rights report, it can be stated that no serious political and civil violations were noticed.In general the state of human rights in our country in 2004 can be considered as sufficient." EVANS
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04