Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05ANKARA1231 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05ANKARA1231 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Ankara |
| Created: | 2005-03-08 17:10:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PGOV PREL PHUM TU |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 ANKARA 001231 SIPDIS DEPARTMENT FOR EUR/SE E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/08/2015 TAGS: PGOV, PREL, PHUM, TU SUBJECT: TURKISH MINISTRY OF JUSTICE OFFICIAL SAYS MOST COLLEAGUES OPPOSE EU ACCESSION REF: ANKARA 1074 Classified By: Classified by Polcounselor John Kunstadter; reasons E.O. 12958 1.4 (b and d). 1. (C) Summary: A close Embassy contact in the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) retired early in frustration after being unable to overcome resistance within the ministry to EU reform; she returned at the insistence of the Justice Minister. The official, an expert on EU law, told us the MOJ Undersecretary has consistently blocked her efforts to enact regulatory reform required by the EU. She said the majority of MOJ bureaucrats openly oppose EU membership. GOT has thus failed to enact many reforms required for EU accession, including changes to the GOT's High Council of Judges and Prosecutors, which the EU has criticized for restricting judicial independence. Moreover, the GOT failed to hold an interministerial meeting after the October EU progress report and December EU Summit to coordinate response to issues raised by the EU, leaving each ministry to develop its own approach. Her observations indicate that Turkey will be off to a slow start when accession negotiations begin in October. End Summary. --------------------------------- MOJ Contact Retires, Then Returns --------------------------------- 2. (C) We met with Ayse Saadet Arikan, director general of the MOJ's General Directorate for EU Affairs, on March 4, shortly after Justice Minister Cicek persuaded her to reverse her decision to take an early retirement. Arikan (please protect), a close Embassy contact, is a key figure within the GOT bureaucracy working on the nuts and bolts of EU harmonization. She is one of Turkey's top experts on EU law -- she studied EU law in Amsterdam and London and wrote her Ph.D. thesis on Turkey-EU relations -- and a strong advocate of EU-related reform. Over the past two years, she has expressed to us her increasing concerns about what she views as the sluggish, unprofessional approach of the GOT and ruling AK Party (AKP) to EU harmonization. Her experience serves as a gauge of Turkey's capacity to meet the long-term demands of the EU accession process. ------------------------ Minister Pledges Support ------------------------ 3. (C) Arikan told us she opted for early retirement in late February out of frustration largely caused by MOJ Undersecretary Fahri Kasirga's constant efforts to undermine the work of her department. She discussed her problems twice with Minister Cicek, whom she respects. Though Cicek tried to leave the impression of being supportive, the situation never improved. Arikan said she completed the paperwork for early retirement and began holding the traditional farewell meetings. When it came time to say goodbye to Cicek, the minister said he was shocked to learn of her decision. Cicek told her she must stay on board, and called the deputy who signed her retirement papers to warn him against taking such action without informing him. He said he had assumed Arikan's problems had been resolved, and promised to address the issue forcefully. 4. (C) Though Arikan returned to work, she told us she will stay only if she is truly able to enact the regulatory reforms required by the EU. She has reason for doubt -- Kasirga challenged Cicek's authority to reverse her retirement, and raised the issue with the Council of State, a high administrative court. Arikan said a contact of hers at the court has assured her that Cicek's decision cannot be challenged. Nevertheless, there is clearly something wrong when an undersecretary so casually rejects the authority of a minister. Arikan said it appears that Cicek, as a transfer to AKP from the Motherland Party (ANAP), is not close enough to the AKP leadership to control the staffing in his ministry. Kasirga -- who enjoys asserting that PM Erdogan directly appointed him -- is clearly not Cicek's man. Moreover, the AKP leadership has appointed a number of unqualified people to the MOJ since coming to power in 2002. Arikan has in the past raised concerns with Cicek about questionable appointments; the minister responded by saying he cannot remove the new appointees, but instead created new positions and filled them with more appropriate applicants to offset the problem. ---------------------------- Most MOJ Officials Oppose EU ---------------------------- 5. (C) Arikan said the problem extends far beyond the Undersecretary's insubordination. Despite the GOT's public commitment to Turkey's domestically popular EU membership, and despite the raft of EU-related legislative reforms adopted by Parliament over the past three years, the majority of MOJ civil servants openly oppose EU membership. "They don't even try to hide it anymore. It's unbelievable," she said. She recalls once confronting Kasirga over his obstructionist approach to EU reforms, only to have him reply mockingly, "You know what I think of the EU." Arikan said her staff at the EU General Directorate is knowledgeable and committed. But officials in other MOJ departments routinely complain about her office, griping that they have excessive work because the EU General Directorate "agreed to EU demands." Sema Kilicer, political officer at the European Commission Representation to Turkey, told us separately that she has noticed a similar attitude among bureaucrats at MOJ and other GOT ministries. Kilicer opined that the GOT will ultimately not be able to meet the demands of adopting the 80,000-page EU aquis unless there is a change of attitude in the bureaucracy. ------------------ EU Reforms Blocked ------------------ 6. (C) The lack of support for EU reform has prevented the MOJ from amending numerous regulations to meet EU standards. Technically, these reforms can be done quickly because they do not require parliamentary approval. But they are being blocked. For example, the EU (and other international observers) has repeatedly maintained that the GOT's High Council of Judges and Prosecutors restricts judicial independence. The EU has noted that the Justice Minister chairs the Council, which controls the career paths of justices, and that the Council is located in the Justice Ministry and does not have a separate budget. 7. (C) The GOT has in theory accepted the need for Council reform, but Kasirga has refused to forward memos from Arikan's office proposing amendments to the Council regulation. This, Arikan said, is the ministry's typically duplicitous approach. The ministry has frequently invited European Commission experts from Brussels to come to Ankara to advise MOJ on regulatory reform. MOJ officials almost always appear to accept the experts' recommendations during meetings. When the visitors depart, however, they proceed in a different direction, either doing nothing or making amendments that contradict EU requirements. When Arikan asks colleagues why they drafted amendments contrary to EU advice, they typically reply, "that's how the director wanted it." Arikat averred that this approach is unprofessional, and ultimately doomed to failure. The GOT can on occasion insist on diverging from EU norms, but it has to explain itself. "You can refuse to do some things -- not many, but some," she said. "But you have to give reasons. You have to communicate." --------------------------------------- "Shocked" By FM's Reply to EU Criticism --------------------------------------- 8. (C) As reported reftel, the EU has criticized the GOT for failure to advance its candidacy since the December Summit. Some are quietly questioning the GOT's, and AKP's, commitment to EU accession. Arikan said she wants to believe that the AKP leadership is sincere in its EU mission, but she is concerned about recent developments. In the past, the GOT has held an interministerial meeting after each EU Summit and progress report to coordinate efforts to address the issues raised by the EU. However, the GOT failed to hold such a meeting after the October progress report and December Summit. As a result, each ministry is deciding for itself how to proceed. Arikan also acknowledges she was "shocked" by FM Gul's blunt reply to recent comments by Ambassador Kretschmer, head of the European Commission Representation to Turkey, on the lack of GOT post-Summit progress. A clearly irritated Gul snapped, "Who the hell does that guy (Kretschmer) think he is to criticize the Government?" when asked about Kretschmer's remarks, using a Turkish expression that is exceptionally rude. "That comment was really confrontational, not diplomatic at all," Arikan said. Kilicer said officials from the MFA contacted the European Commission office and the Dutch Embassy (representing the Luxembourg presidency in Ankara) to say that Gul had been "provoked" by reporters and had spoken "emotionally." ----------------------- EU Needed As "Catalyst" ----------------------- 9. (C) Many Turks, including GOT officials and members of the general public, doubt whether the EU would ever accept Turkey as a member, regardless of whatever reforms are adopted. Arikan shares these doubts -- like many of our contacts she points to the recent French constitutional amendment requiring a national referendum on future EU members as a bad omen. But more important than accession is the reform process itself. As she sees it, Turkey needs to bring its laws, regulations, and practices up to EU standards. Whether or not that leads to EU accession is a concern to be addressed in the future. "The EU is an important catalyst for reform. If you remove that catalyst, we will not progress," she said. ------- Comment ------- 10. (C) Arikan is watching the EU accession process from the inside, far removed from the political hyperbole that has surrounded Turkey's candidacy. Her experience reveals a bureaucracy unprepared for the next, longer and more technical phase of the accession process. We have heard reports of similar skepticism in other ministries, including the MFA: Danish DCM relayed to us March 8 the statement of Turkish MFA Deputy U/S Bozkir to a Dutch colleague that only 30% of the MFA supports the EU candidacy. The GOT will have time to adapt, and it is too early to predict how the process will end. But Turkey appears headed for a slow start when accession negotiations begin in October. EDELMAN
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04