Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05WARSAW1282 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05WARSAW1282 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Warsaw |
| Created: | 2005-03-08 11:17:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | EPET ENRG EINV PREL PL |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 04 WARSAW 001282 SIPDIS STATE FOR EUR/NCE TARA ERATH AND MICHAEL SESSUMS STATE FOR EB/CBED AMB. MANN AND ERIC JONES STATE FOR EB/ESC STEVE GALLOGLY AND MATT MCMANUS USDOC FOR 4232/ITA/MAC/EUR/JBURGESS AND MWILSON TREASURY FOR OASIA MATTHEW GAERTNER DOE FOR IA-42 ROBERT PRICE E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/15/2016 TAGS: EPET, ENRG, EINV, PREL, PL SUBJECT: POLISH PIPELINE COMPANY FINALIZING A BUSINESS PLAN FOR ODESSA-BRODY-GDANSK, STILL LOOKING FOR CHEVRON SUPPORT REF: (A) WARSAW 1080 (B) KIEV 381 Classified By: Economic Counselor Richard Rorvig, reasons 1.5 (b and d) . ------- Summary ------- 1. (C) As promised, PM Belka met with his Ukrainian counterpart PM Tymoshenko early in her tenure to discuss practical steps the two sides could take to deepen their bilateral ties. The two Prime Ministers agreed to form a bilateral committee to accelerate work on linking the Odessa-Brody oil pipeline to the Polish oil grid in Plock. The Polish pipeline company and its Ukrainian counterpart UTN will prepare a financial and business plan for the pipeline, and hope to secure the interest of Chevron or another Kazakh oil shipper. Chevron reports it does not rule out becoming involved "eventually," but wants to avoid angering Russia, a goal Poland and Ukraine share. The two delegations also discussed the potential for Poland to develop gas storage in Ukraine, Ukraine's interest in investing in a Polish steel mill and electricity exports. End Summary. ------------------------------------ Initial Poland-Ukraine Consultations ------------------------------------ 2. (U) On March 3-4, Polish PM Marek Belka paid an official visit to Kiev to discuss a wide range of economic cooperation topics, including the Odessa-Brody oil pipeline, Ukrainian electricity exports to Poland, and Kiev's interest in investing in the state-owned Czestochowa steel mill. Polish papers report the two sides agreed to set up a special working group to extend the Odessa-Brody (OBG) oil pipeline to Plock in central Poland and on to the port of Gdansk. According to the Polish press, Ukrainian PM Tymoshenko stressed the importance of using the pipeline to ship Caspian and other oil to West European markets as a means of diversifying Europe's sources of oil. An MFA official told a Polish paper that it will be essential to attract investors from Kazakhstan particularly Chevron. ---------------------------------- Reversal in Principle, but Not Now: ---------------------------------- 3. (C) Halina Trymucha, Director of the Ministry of Economy's Energy Security Department, who participated in the meetings, and said the most important achievement was an agreement to form a committee to accelerate inter-governmental efforts to extend Odessa-Brody to Plock and Gdansk. The Polish delegation was very pleased that Ukrainian PM Tymoshenko provided such strong statements endorsing the western orientation of Odessa-Brody. It is also very happy that she did not announce the GOU would reverse the pipeline immediately. Trymucha reported both sides agreed they would work to build the necessary link to the Polish system, after which the pipeline would be reversed. Trymucha said the minutes of the meeting agreed by the two heads of delegation suggested that the outer limit to complete the OBG pipeline would be three years, i.e., 2008. ----------------- Kazakhstan is Key: ----------------- 4. (C) While the Polish Government is pleased with the renewed Ukrainian commitment to the project, Trymucha believes the participation of a Kazakh oil producer like Chevron or ConocoPhillips will be key to making the project work. Cezary Filipowicz, the president of Sarmatia, the PERN-UTN joint venture formed to realize Odessa-Brody-Gdansk, explained that the companies had looked at shipping lighter Azeri crudes, but these have too many other good alternatives to use OBG on a cost-effective basis. Chevron and Kazakhstan, on the other hand, are looking for a new outlet for a large quantity of oil from Chevron's Caspian Pipeline Consortium (CPC) pipeline, which Chevron hopes will be expanded by 2007. The Director for International Agreements at the Polish Pipeline Company (PERN), Cezary Lewandowski, said Chevron is still the best fit for the project, in part because Chevron has done far more analysis than other shippers on the details of OBG. He said Chevron also has the greatest potential interest in increasing returns for its CPC-blend by gaining direct pipeline access to European markets. ---------------------- Chevron Still Watching: ---------------------- 5. (C) Luis Coimbra, Director of Chevron's Marketing Transportation Department, said his company is still watching Odessa-Brody carefully, and thinks Chevron may get involved "eventually," but needs to wait for the right time. Coimbra thinks it could be useful for PERN and UTN to develop Odessa-Brody in such a way that it could facilitate oil exports through both the northern and southern Druzhba systems into Europe. He suggested it would be useful for the new GOU to declare publicly that Odessa Brody can be used to export Russian Urals blend through the southern Druzhba (through Croatia) and CPC blend through the northern Druzhba through Poland. Coimbra also reported that Kazakhstan may be willing to finance the construction of a 52 kilometer pipeline to connect CPC to OBG without having to tanker oil between Novorossysk (the current terminus of the CPC pipeline) and Odessa. Coimbra cautioned, however, that a number of steps have to be taken for Chevron to be comfortable getting involved in OBG. One of the most important steps is to persuade Russia (particularly pipeline operator Transneft) to agree to the project. Coimbra also noted that Chevron is considering other options, which may be more commercially attractive. He concluded by stating "OBG is not that important for us to be throwing mud in Russia's face at this time. We are working with TNK-BP on the Burgas-Alexandropolous bypass and the Russians on CPC expansion." -------------------------- Opening the Door to Russia: -------------------------- 6. (C) The Polish Government would like to find a way to involve Russia in the project in a constructive way. Lewandowski said that PERN is planning to leave 10 percent of the project open to Russian companies. Trymucha noted the difficulty of getting the sequencing right, however, in approaching Russia. Poland does not want to exclude Russia, but also wants to avoid giving Russia an effective veto over its development. ------------------------------- Financial Model by End of March: ------------------------------- 7. (SBU) PERN's Lewandowski reports that PERN has been working closely with its Ukrainian counterpart, Uktransnafta (UTN), and expects to have completed work on a financial model by the end of March. PERN has already prepared a basic business plan, which it will augment once the financial model is complete. To enhance the plan's credibility, PERN hopes to attract a serious partner (preferably Chevron) to the project and release the plan as a joint product. 8. (C) Tariffs will be an important part of the financial model, but will ultimately depend on the volumes of oil shipped. Filipowicz said initial calculations suggest that, for smaller volumes of 9-12 million tons per year (MTA), OBG would have very high tariffs, of up to $15 per ton, compared to $3-5 for competing Bosphorus bypass pipelines like Burgas-Alexandropolous. One of the key goals of the joint PERN-UTN working group will be settling questions related to the tariffs Ukraine will expect on the pipeline. The two companies will also continue to look at ways to shave costs, including potential changes in routes. In examining potential route changes, PERN's management is reluctant to endanger ongoing operational links with Transneft in the management of the Druzhba system, which is likely to minimize the potential for building a link to Adamowo instead of Plock. ------------- Finding Money: ------------- 9. (C) Lewandowski said that the Polish Government will have to make a strategic decision in the second half of 2005r whether it wants private companies to develop this project, or whether the government will want to spend the money necessary to build the pipeline (at an estimated cost of $500 million to extend the pipeline from Brody to Plock). He confirmed that the European Investment Bank has volunteered that it would be willing to finance up to 500 million Euro ($650 million) for the project, depending on the scope of the project. This loan, however, comes with a number of conditions which Lewandowski said may make commercial financing easier. Commercial banks will want to see that a significant oil shipper is committed to the project, however. While he still expects the GOP to look to commercial companies to finance the project, Lewandowski said that it is possible that the GOP could decide that it is too important a project to let it languish should no clear sponsor step forward. Lewandowski expected that this decision will have to wait for a government to be formed after this year's general elections (expected June 16), as, currently, the project lacks a committed senior sponsor in the GOP. ------------------- Gas and Electricity: ------------------- 10. (C) Economy's Trymucha said Poland and Ukraine agreed to explore opportunities to develop gas storage for the Polish Gas Company (PGNiG) in Ukraine. Poland is still smarting from Gazprom's cutoff of Belarus (which cut gas for a day to Poland) in February 2004, and has been looking to develop short-term storage options. Western Ukraine has several natural formations which may fit the bill, and provide an early sign of tangible cooperation between Poland and the new GOU. Trymucha noted that the Polish papers had widely reported a statement Belka made that the two sides would examine prospects for Ukrainian electricity exports to Poland. Trymucha said that Belka is trying to play up the meeting's achievements. The reality is that Poland looked a year ago at the prospect of buying electricity from western Ukraine, but decided it was simply too costly. Poland is working first with the EU to ensure it joins the European electricity grid (UCT), which it is most likely to do through a connection through Silesia to the Czech Republic. Poland will probably wait for UCT plans to link the EU's system to Ukraine by 2008 before investing in any projects to link systems over the border. Trymucha said Poland could decide over time to import electricity from Ukraine if it developed problems meeting its Kyoto emissions targets in coming years. -------------------------- Other Areas of Cooperation: -------------------------- 11. (SBU) Polish papers report that Ukraine expressed considerable interest in bidding on the privatization sale of the Huta Czestochowa steel mill. A Ukrainian firm, Donbas, is reported to have submitted a lower bid than the Indian steel company, LNM, although the latter has until April 13 to better Donbas' offer. At the end of February, Treasury Minister Socha told Econoff that Donbas had submitted a good offer, and had a good chance of winning the tender, although he noted price would be the most important factor in making the final decision. 12. (U) Polish papers also reported that the two prime ministers agreed to develop a project with Russia to link their rail systems. In cooperation with a consortium of investors, including the American firm DEC, Polish Railways (PKP) developed new technology in 2004 which allows rail cars to move from European track to Russian gauge track without offloading their cargo. PKP hopes that this will allow greater traffic flows with Russia and Ukraine, starting with passenger service and eventually expanding to freight. Comment: ------- 13. (C) The GOU's declaration of support for the westward orientation of the project is very important in reassuring potential shippers like Chevron. Even more important, Ukraine and Poland refrained from "re-reversing" the pipeline until an alternative has been developed. Finalizing the much-delayed business plan will be the next step, which should help illuminate the key questions both Poland and Ukraine need to address if this project is to be realized (e.g., tariffs and taxes). Completing the business plan will make the project look both more commercial, encouraging potential shippers to take one more look, and less political, potentially opening the door for a face-saving end to Russian opposition. Unfortunately, as history has shown, the remaining steps may not be easy for the parties to complete. Upcoming Polish elections may also slow the process of GOP decision-making, although the opposition parties generally support OBG as a means of increasing Poland's energy security. ASHE
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04