Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05BOGOTA1929 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05BOGOTA1929 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Bogota |
| Created: | 2005-03-01 20:07:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | ECON ETRD KIPR CO FTA |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS BOGOTA 001929 SIPDIS SENSITIVE STATE PASS TO USTR - BRIAN PECK, BENNETT HARMAN E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: ECON, ETRD, KIPR, CO, FTA SUBJECT: GOC FIRES LEAD IPR NEGOTIATOR FOR THE FTA Sensitive but Unclassified --please protect accordingly. 1. (SBU) On February 24 Commerce Minister Botero and FTA chief negotiator Gomez announced that the GOC removed Colombia's lead intellectual property negotiator, Luis Angel Madrid. Javier Gamboa, Madrid's deputy, will now lead the Colombian IP team. Botero and Gomez fired Madrid after finding out late Wednesday, February 23 that the intellectual property negotiating team had inserted unapproved language in a joint Ecuadoran-Colombian data protection proposal during the seventh round of the FTA in Cartagena. Madrid, without the knowledge and approval of the GOC and the Colombian private sector, inserted text in the proposal that would allow Colombia to retain its current data protection regime, contained in decree 2085, during the proposed transition period (through 2014). Ecuador agreed to Madrid's proposal as Ecuador has no data protection in place and would not be affected by the addition. Madrid also failed to brief the Colombian government on his actions, and they only became clear during a presentation to private sector advisors on the actions taken at the Cartagena round on February 23. 2. (SBU) The local Colombian pharmaceutical sector, whose leaders have long claimed that the GOC was negotiating behind the back of the private sector, took this action as proof of their worst suspicions. The president of ASINFAR (Association of Colombian Pharmaceutical Industries), Alberto Bravo, was particularly upset by Madrid,s unilateral action and publicly called for the Minister's and Gomez's resignations. The rest of the private sector also saw Madrid's action as a negative precedent and one that undermined the GOC's credibility in the negotiations. Hoping to stem this erosion of confidence, Minister Botero immediately called for Madrid's removal. The move seems to have worked and the private sector has accepted the GOC's explanation and praised the Minister's rapid resolution of the problem. Colombia and Ecuador are now working on a new proposal, which will reportedly contain no provision for Colombia to retain its current level of protection through the proposed transition period. 3. (SBU) According to FTA chief negotiator Gomez, the real problem with the proposal was in form not substance. The GOC wanted to insert language that would allow it to maintain current protections, but could not gain the private sector's support at this time. The GOC was lobbying the local companies and hoped to obtain their approval by the next full round of negotiations in April in Lima. Gomez now fears that it will be much more difficult to obtain the local industry's approval for such a proposal. Moreover, the episode has strengthened the hand of those in the GOC, particularly in the Ministry of Social Protection, who wish to weaken current data protection standards. Gomez now feels that he faces an even more difficult fight on IP, one of the most sensitive areas of the FTA negotiations. Gomez also highlighted that this episode underscores how closely the private sector is watching developments during the FTA negotiations and the need for full transparency in the process. WOOD
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04