Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05VATICAN443 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05VATICAN443 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Vatican |
| Created: | 2005-02-23 09:54:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | KIRF PHUM PREL SU VT |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L VATICAN 000443 SIPDIS DEPT FOR EUR/WE LEVIN; AF/SPG SMALL; AF/E; AF/RSA E.O. 12958: DECL: (####) TAGS: KIRF, PHUM, PREL, SU, VT SUBJECT: SUDAN: VATICAN HESITANT ON AU-UN TRIBUNAL REF: STATE 21439 -------------- Summary -------------- 1. (C) Holy See Country Director for Sudan Monsignor Lucio Sembrano told us February 10 that the Holy See was optimistic regarding Darfur, but hesitant about the proposed African Union (AU) - UN Sudan Tribunal. He maintained that the International Criminal Court (ICC) would be the most effective means to bring war criminals to justice and increase stability in the region. End summary. -------------------------------------------- Sudan Tribunal not the Answer -------------------------------------------- 2. (SBU) Holy See Country Director for Sudan Monsignor Lucio Sembrano told PolChief February 10 that, in light of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement and other recent developments, the Holy See was optimistic regarding Darfur, but cautioned that the international community needed to step up its engagement to bring about an effective solution to the current crisis. 3. (C) Regarding the U.S proposal for an African Union (AU) - UN Tribunal for Sudan (reftel), Sembrano was hesitant. He cited what he regards as the "100 percent negative results" of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda as an example of the shortcomings of "special courts." Thus, the idea that an AU-UN court would share existing infrastructure with the Rwanda Tribunal did not sooth his worries. The international community should "learn from experience" on Rwanda, Sembrano concluded. ---------------------------- ICC a Better Option ---------------------------- 4. (C) Sembrano acknowledged the U.S. opposition to using the ICC in this case, but said he nevertheless regards it as the better option for war criminals in Darfur. He hoped the U.S. would reconsider its position on the ICC in an instance such as this, where it could be effective, even while it maintained its broader opposition to the court. To the extent that any court would need to rely on cooperation from the Sudanese government, Sembrano foresaw challenges. "The day they start handing over Muslims for war crimes, I'll embrace Islam," the Catholic priest quipped. The government, he continued, "closes both eyes and allows [the offenders] impunity." The most important thing at this point, Sembrano concluded, is for the international community to be united in confronting the violence and bringing about justice. 5. (SBU) We passed Sembrano reftel points on the Tribunal and the proposed peacekeeping operation for Darfur, emphasizing the benefits of the USG proposal. He thanked the U.S. for its "tireless" efforts for peace in Sudan. HARDT NNNN 2005VATICA00443 - Classification: CONFIDENTIAL
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04