Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05KINSHASA283 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05KINSHASA283 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Kinshasa |
| Created: | 2005-02-17 14:00:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | KFRD CVIS CMGT CG |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 07 KINSHASA 000283 SIPDIS FOR CA/FPP/ENAF, CA/VO E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: KFRD, CVIS, CMGT, CG SUBJECT: CONGO-KINSHASA NIV FRAUD OVERVIEW ------- SUMMARY ------- 1. Nonimmigrant visa (NIV) fraud in Congo-Kinshasa is commonplace, but on the whole not highly sophisticated. Fake or falsified documents from private and government applicants are its main sources. The ease with which passports and other state-issued documents such as birth certificates and diplomas can be obtained or forged demands careful examination of all papers. Bank statements and attestations of employment from businesses and NGOs also are easily fabricated or falsified rendering untrustworthy much of the support documentation submitted by Congolese visa applicants. Furthermore, post has not been immune to internal fraud. All these factors call for vigilance to detect NIV malfeasance and facilitate the travel of bona fide applicants. The challenges that fraud presents for the NIV process in Congo-Kinshasa will carry over to the immigrant visa (IV) process when post this year resumes issuing IVs after a seven-year suspension. End summary. ---------- BACKGROUND ---------- 2. Post currently processes only NIV applications. The IV function was suspended in 1998 in response to repeated Embassy evacuations due to civil war and resulting instability. IV issuance, however, is scheduled to resume in April 2005. Post NIV workload is relatively small for a nation the size of Congo -- the third largest country in Africa. Approximately 4,500 NIV applications were received in FY 2004, a 33 percent increase compared to FY 2003. Post attributes the rise in applications to several factors, including an increase in demand for official GDRC travel following the installation in 2003 of a large government of transition, increased stability in the country brought on by the peace process, and the overall worldwide increase in visa applications following the decline witnessed after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. The NIV refusal rate averages about 54 percent. Post believes this relatively low rate of refusal for a developing country reflects the high proportion of official travelers from the GDRC and the local United Nations peacekeeping operation (MONUC) as well as decreased numbers of frivolous applications deterred by the $100 non-reimbursable application fee and post's reputation for stringent adjudication. There has been significant progress in advancing the peace process in Congo following the installation of the transitional government and plans for national elections in 2005. Nevertheless, the security situation remains tenuous. Armed military activity by rebel militia continues sporadically in the east. In 2004 rioting and looting occurred in several cities throughout the country. Likewise, while the DRC economy has registered moderate growth in recent years, Congo remains one of the poorest nations in the world. Personal income is extremely low, public institutions are weak and much of the country's infrastructure either does not function or has been destroyed. The general population copes with inadequate basic education, substandard health care and few job opportunities. These factors cause many Congolese to seek better conditions elsewhere, including the United States. These compelling incentives to emigrate lead to pervasive fraud in nonimmigrant visa applications. -------------- DOCUMENT FRAUD -------------- 3. False documentation is the principal form of fraud among Congolese NIV applicants. From passports to birth certificates, all documents can be forged or falsified whether by corrupt officials, professional forgers or clever visa applicants. This necessitates scrupulous inspection of all credentials and, where possible, cross checking with local authorities to confirm authenticity. In 2000, the DRC introduced a newly designed passport and pronounced all previous versions invalid. The new passport has a security laminate feature, but is not machine readable, rendering it relatively unreliable. Cases of photo substitution have been detected. Usually this entails imposters placing their photos into legitimate passports that show a documented history of prior travel to the United States or Europe. The donor passport can be from a friend or relative. However, there are confirmed instances where male fide applicants have paid as much as several thousand dollars on the street for photo-substituted travel documents. Suspicious passports are usually evaluated using three tactics: (a) the document is rigorously examined by the naked eye and under UV light for signs of alteration; (b) the supposed traveler is asked to provide details about their prior trips; and (c) the applicant is asked to reproduce the bearer's signature in the passport. Another persistent concern is that Congolese birth certificates and other forms of identity can be easily obtained with fake names and biographic information, thereby facilitating the issuance of genuine passports containing the same false biodata. The extent to which Congolese applicants submit valid passports containing false identities cannot easily be discerned, though several such cases have been detected. Post has relied on reviewing the CLASS name-check results for similar name variations and close dates of birth. Often an applicant will apply under the name of a sibling. For possible matches, the photos and handwriting from the two application forms can be compared to determine if the person has previously applied under another identity. The launching last year of biodata collection for all applicants will go a long way toward detecting imposters. Already, post has identified two applicants whose fingerprint results showed that they had previously applied under different identities. Another concern is that Congolese civil certificates, including birth, death, marriage and divorce documents, rather than being centralized, are issued at the local level. This decentralized system poses serious difficulties when verifying authenticity. Because of the impracticality of collecting vast numbers of specimens of authorizing signatures and stamps from town officials (except perhaps for the most common issuing authorities in the capital Kinshasa), most civil documents must be individually checked at the local level. However, the huge size of Congo (approximately the same area as the United States east of the Mississippi River) and the lack of road and communication infrastructure, make verification nearly always impossible. Moreover, civil authorities issue two types of certificates, an "acte" (of birth, marriage or death), or an "attestation" of the same. An "acte de naissance," or certificate of birth, for example, is issued at the time and place of the actual birth. However, an "attestation de naissance," or attestation of birth, could be recorded and issued years later at any location. Thus, a birth that occurred in a remote area of the country 25 years ago could be "registered" in the capital Kinshasa based simply on testimony, and an accompanying "attestation" of birth would then be issued by Kinshasa officials. Additionally, Congolese civil documents are not necessarily uniform in design, nor do they contain the simplest anti- forgery elements. Birth certificates, for example, are typed on plain common paper. The town hall insignia or seal can be easily printed on any home or office printer, and wet seals can be made or altered to appear genuine. This ease of forgery combined with the decentralized system of archiving and the wide use of "attestations" calls into question the legitimacy of nearly all Congolese civil records. Private-sector documents are also highly susceptible to forgery in Congo. A good example is pay stubs, which NIV applicants could submit in order to demonstrate income. Because there are no payroll companies in Congo, most pay stubs are issued by the organization using a home or office computer. Often they will be stamped with a corporate seal and signed by a supervisor or financial officer. Because they are so easily produced in any variation, post is forced to give them little weight as convincing proof of income. The same can be said for attestations of employment. Any letterhead and rubber seal can be fabricated to issue a letter from any company attesting to employment and salary. Congolese NIV applicants have the best chance of proving income and financial assets by submitting bank records. Unfortunately, however, Congo has a history of an unreliable banking system. Under the Mobutu regime many people regularly lost funds deposited in banks. As a result, and despite reform in recent years, most Congolese do not trust the banking system and have no bank accounts. High fees are a further deterrent to their widespread use. But even those banking statements that are submitted must be scrupulously examined for authenticity. The statements issued by local banks are not sophisticated and are regularly forged with quality color laser printers. Post has made efforts to visit the most popular local banks to learn how best to determine the genuineness of statements. This usually entails observing the statement for clarity and conformity while paying particular attention to the letterhead color to ensure that it matches exactly the sample provided by the bank. Nonetheless, periodic checking for accounts and balances remains a necessity. --------- NGO FRAUD --------- 4. Post sees occasional fraud stemming from real or fictitious Congolese NGOs. Development, health and human rights NGOs are the most frequently cited in this type of fraud, which usually takes one of two forms - forged documents from legitimate organizations, or documents from phantom groups. The purpose of travel is usually to attend a conference or to receive training. For legitimate NGOs, genuine letterhead can be used to produce documents alleging employment and travel orders. The letterhead may have been obtained and used either with or without the knowledge of organization officials. With the availability of high- quality printers, official-looking letterhead can be easily reproduced or forged. Likewise, documents from imaginary NGOs can easily be created and are frequently submitted in support of visa applications. The conference destinations themselves can be either real or fictitious. Male fide travelers search the Internet for conferences, workshops or trade shows for which anyone can register on line, often for a nominal fee. Legitimate NGO conferences in the U.S. also attract male fide applicants as "tag ons" with legitimate attendees. This can often be the case with large well known yearly conferences, such as the Lions Club or Rotary Club. Verification is key to determining the legitimacy of the purported conference. The venue and theme must be verified as must the employment of the applicant. In addition, post must rigorously question applicants to verify their expertise in the field of NGO work and the value that would come to the organization out of the proposed travel. ------------------ STUDENT VISA FRAUD ------------------ 5. Student visa fraud in Kinshasa is not generally of the type that is organized or systemic. There was, however, one such instance in 2004 that stemmed from the Brazzaville side of the house. [Note: Post shares office space with Embassy Brazzaville, which processes visas for Republic of Congo (ROC) applicants every Monday in Kinshasa]. The case involved a pastor in Brazzaville who was helping prospective students prepare their visa applications for a particular college in Nebraska. Approximately eight applications for the same school were submitted within one month -- two of them from Congo-Kinshasa and six from Congo-Brazzaville. After remarking the similarities of the applicants' supporting documents, a fraud investigation revealed that while the students' admission letters and I-20s were legitimate, the financial support documents, including bank statements, were forged. Additionally, all the students produced letters from various government ministries promising employment after finishing their education in the United States. The unlikely possibility of a government ministry promising employment four or five years down the road further raised suspicion of an organized scheme. The pastor who organized the fraud was never found, but interviews of the student applicants as well as admissions officials at the college in the United States revealed that he apparently took payment for helping young Congolese procure student visas to this particular college. Other student visa fraud concerns individual cases of applicants submitting fraudulent supporting documentation. These include financial papers such as bank statements and employment letters, as well as state-issued baccalaureate (high school) diplomas. Like other Congolese documents, the "diplome d'etat" can be easily forged or falsified. In addition, grade reports, though fairly standardized, are not sophisticated and are easily susceptible to forgery or alteration. Many Congolese student applicants have sponsors who reside in the United States. Oftentimes they are family members who pledge financial support. Other times, the relationship of the prospective student and the U.S. sponsor is less clear. There are instances where students have applied with letters from sponsors whom they have never met in person, but with whom they had corresponded over the Internet. Sometimes students produce financial support documents of colleagues of close or extended family whom they have never met. As with all applications, rigorous questioning and document verification is necessary to determine the prospective student's seriousness, academic ability and financial resources. -------------- OFFICIAL FRAUD -------------- 6. Visa fraud at the official level occurs in three general categories: passport fraud, travel order fraud, and imposters. GDRC ministries and agencies have in the past issued passports and travel orders to male fide applicants and presented imposters as legitimate government workers. The establishment in 2003 of a large interim government of transition poses further concern. With four vice presidents, dozens of ministers and vice ministers, a sizable parliament and accompanying staff, the prospects for fraud at the official level have increased concomitantly. Official GDRC passports have only marginally better issuance criteria and control that do regular passports. Congolese service passports are issued to anyone connected to the government, from ministry and presidential staff members to professors at state universities and employees of parastatals. Moreover, for a fee official passports can be obtained by just about anyone with a connection to the government. Diplomatic passports have a stricter issuance criteria. However, there have been instances from the past where diplomatic passports were issued to unqualified bearers such as extended family of Congolese diplomats or other high-level government officials. Again for the right price or with the right connection it is possible to gain access to these more prestigious travel documents. For these reasons, post rarely waives the personal appearance requirement for Class A or Class G visas for Congolese officials. Only for cases where the applicant has a history of documented prior travel and/or is known to the consular officer or other Embassy personnel might the interview requirement be waived. For official government travel, applicants must submit two documents with their applications: an "ordre de mission" and a "note verbale." The "ordre de mission," or travel order, is issued by the relevant ministry or department and outlines information about the mission, including who is traveling, their position, the dates of travel and the purpose of travel. The "note verbale" is a pro forma note from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs requesting that the Embassy issue the visa. Here again, fraud takes two tracks - forged documents or legitimate documents issued to male fide applicants. Usually, it is the latter, particularly the "ordres de missions" as few forged ones have been detected. Post has little faith that the GDRC authorities issuing the documents go to any great lengths to verify the validity of the proposed mission. Again, for a price authentic travel orders can probably be easily obtained. The "note verbale" issued by the MFA is usually of poor quality, the original having been photocopied many times over. Mistakes are often corrected with liquid paper and retyped. The "ordres de missions" vary from each ministry and can be either of high quality with a raised or embossed ministry seal and clearly typed, or they too can be faded photocopies with liquid paper corrections. More often than not, conoff must take the time to verify that the meeting or conference stated in the travel order is in fact taking place. For example, the applicant will be asked to provide the name and telephone number of the person at the World Bank in Washington, D.C., with whom they are to have "consultations" as stated in the "ordre de mission." Those that never call back to submit the information -- which happens -- were most likely male fide travelers. Finally, because official passports can be obtained with ease, government staff has in the past presented questionable applicants as legitimate government works with bona fide travel orders. Additionally, there have been instances where diplomats have claimed extended family or others as children or dependents entitled to derivative status. In another instance of fraud at the official level, the permanent representative to the United Nations of a west African nation supported the G1 application of a Congolese citizen to work as the receptionist at that country's mission in New York. Inquiries revealed that the applicant, who had no office work experience, was the relative of a close Congolese friend of the permanent representative. Large official delegations to UN conferences and workshops must be thoroughly screened to determine that applicants are legitimate employees, have worked at the relevant ministry for a reasonable length of time, and that each applicant has a clear purpose for attending the conference. --------------------- POST VALIDATION STUDY --------------------- 7. Post uses a validation callback procedure to ascertain levels of nonreturn to Congo of NIV travelers. Selected participants are asked to choose a convenient day shortly after their projected return to country in order to present in person at the Consular Section and verify their return. At the time their visas are issued, participants are given a dated ticket, which permits access to the Consular Section on that day. Criteria for selecting participants vary. Some are selected completely at random. Others are chosen due to particular circumstances, such as a first-time traveler to the United States. Post periodically places GDRC delegations on callback to ascertain the legitimacy of official travel. Callback results are tabulated quarterly. The total number of participants due to report for a given quarter are reviewed to determine the percentage that reported back as required. Attempts are then made to contact "no-shows" to either encourage them to present at the Consular Section, or to at least verify by other means their return. "No-shows" that cannot be contacted are assumed to be overstays. "No- show" rates have varied from as low as 4 percent to as high as 14 percent. Post reviews the DS-156 of each "no-show" to discern any patterns or commonalities that could be useful for future adjudication. For the most part, they are individuals traveling for business or pleasure. Recent studies have revealed no notable group patterns of intending immigrants. -------------- INTERNAL FRAUD -------------- 8. Another area that must be continually monitored is internal fraud. Last year two incidents at Embassy Kinshasa underscored the vulnerability of any Consular Section to fraud from the inside. In the spring, post discovered that one of the local guards was coaching applicants on how to answer certain questions posed by the consular officer. In one instance he had instructed an applicant not to reveal a prior visa refusal on the application form. The guard was dismissed, and as a result conoff redrew guard duties and organized a staff meeting, which included the guards, to review their duties and to emphasize the expectation that staff must report any and all suspicious activity, even among fellow staff members. Post recognizes the importance of officers monitoring the activities of FSNs, including the local guard force. However, the current physical design of the Consular Section makes this difficult, a problem that will be improved with a planned renovation of the Consular Section this year. More disquieting was the discovery this past summer that a Kinshasa FSN consular clerk had been accepting money as part of a broader scheme by others outside the Embassy to procure NIVs from Congo-Brazzaville by introducing false documents. The scheme was discovered when the employee was arrested following an investigation by local police. Police were tipped off by a Congolese who paid to benefit from the scheme, but who apparently became concerned when he was given a photo-substituted Congo-Brazzaville passport in order to make his application. Following an investigation by the RSO and Congolese authorities, the FSN was terminated. Post could not ascertain the exact number of visas that might have been secured under the scheme. However, it was determined that the extent of collusion by the FSN was limited to providing advice on what types of fake mission orders and other supporting documents were likely be accepted by the Congo-Brazzaville consular officer. As a result, that officer now routinely verifies all government travel orders from the Republic of Congo. These two examples of internal malfeasance underscore the need for vigilance and spot checks of consular functions. The Consular Section works closely with the RSO and reports any unusual activity. ------------------------- IMPLICATIONS FOR IV FRAUD ------------------------- 9. Post has not processed IVs since 1998, but clearly understands that the fraud patterns that make NIV work so challenging in Congo-Kinshasa will carry over to this process when post resumes issuing IVs visas in April 2005. Post already has a feel for some of the specific areas of IVs that will require scrutiny. Where possible, Embassy Kinshasa has helped neighboring posts that are processing IVs for Congolese applicants to verify the authenticity of local Congolese documents. (Note: Embassy Yaounde has been processing the largest number of Congo IV cases during the past seven years). This assistance usually takes the form of verifying birth and marriage certificates for applicants as well as diplomas and other academic credentials for DV winners and dependents. Relationship verification and the authentication of academic records will be the foundation of IV fraud work and investigation in Congo-Kinshasa. The recent hiring of an EFM Consular Associate will allow post to conduct more investigations and to establish better contacts with local issuing officials. In addition, post plans to build an extensive library of document samples, including, where possible, exemplars of authorized signatures and seals of principal issuing authorities. Post's fraud FSN has attended a fraud workshop at FSI, but post would welcome a regional fraud seminar that would bring together FSN investigators from eastern, central and southern Africa to share information and experiences. ------- COMMENT ------- 10. In general, NIV applicant fraud in Congo-Kinshasa is both prevalent and, to a large extent, ineffective. The bulk of fraud consists of the submission of bogus documents purporting employment, salary and assets, or travel orders. Post sees examples daily of applicants submitting what are presumed to be fabricated, or least suspicious, support documents. Because false credentials are so pervasive in Congo-Kinshasa, they usually carry little weight when adjudicating a visa applicant's ties to Congo. In general, only bona fide prior travelers with convincing documentation of employment and financial assets from an established bank -- sometimes verified by the consular officer -- are issued nonimmigrant visas. Against this background, the visa interview is key to the adjudication process. Even applicants that appear well qualified on paper must talk convincingly to the officer of their employment, purpose of travel and other ties to Congo in order to be issued an NIV. For detecting NIV fraud, there is no substitute for meticulous adjudication in conjunction with document verification. The same vigilance will be required with the resumption of the IV process this year. End Comment. 11. Bujumbura minimize considered. Meece
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04