Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05NEWDELHI1141 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05NEWDELHI1141 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy New Delhi |
| Created: | 2005-02-14 11:01:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | KNNP PREL IN PK KN |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L NEW DELHI 001141 SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/13/2015 TAGS: KNNP, PREL, IN, PK, KN SUBJECT: LOOKING AT DPRK, GOI COMPLAINS OF LACK OF TRANSPARENCY RE AQ KHAN Classified By: DCM Robert O. Blake, Jr. for Reasons 1.4 (B, D) 1. (C) For the Indian government, North Korea's explicit reaffirmation of its nuclear status has revived concern about the nexus with Pakistan. MEA Director of Disarmament and International Security Affairs Venu Rajamony complained to PolCouns on February 9 that neither Pakistan nor the U.S. have been "at all transparent" about the status of the A.Q. Khan investigation. In response to PolCouns' query about India's approach to the North Korean nuclear proliferation issue at the upcoming IAEA Board of Governors meeting, Rajamony underlined the GOI's firm line on the issue. He also reminded us of India's position that it is necessary for the international community to focus more on the supply side of nuclear proliferation. He reiterated New Delhi's frustration over the A.Q. Khan issue, highlighting that, as far as the GOI is concerned, all nuclear proliferation roads lead back to him. MULFORD
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04